Archive | March, 2011
26 Mar
GOP frontrunners recruit pastors for front lines
Bachmann, Gingrich,Huckabee, urge preachers to renew their presence in politics

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa – Over 600 pastors, ministry leaders and their spouses in the key election state of Iowa this week were challenged by high-profile political leaders to renew their influence on American government and once again make the USA “one nation under God.”
Photobucket


The church leaders met for the Iowa Renewal Project’s Pastor’s Policy Briefing, headlined on its opening night by potential presidential candidates including Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., with Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour and Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich scheduled for the next day.

Historian David Barton, head of Wallbuilders, an organization dedicated to presenting America’s moral, religious and constitutional foundations, opened the event by recalling the influence of the “Black Robed Regiment” – preachers from the American Colonies who not only stirred the people toward revolution, but also took up arms with them in the War for Independence:

“The Black Robed Regiment was the name that the British placed on the courageous and patriotic American clergy during the Founding Era (a backhanded reference to the black robes they wore),” Barton documents on a website dedicated to the 18th-century pastors. “Significantly, the British blamed the Black Regiment for American Independence, and rightfully so, for modern historians have documented that: ‘There is not a right asserted in the Declaration of Independence which had not been discussed by the New England clergy before 1763.'”

He continues, “It is strange to today’s generation to think that the rights listed in the Declaration of Independence were nothing more than a listing of sermon topics that had been preached from the pulpit in the two decades leading up to the American Revolution, but such was the case.”

At the Pastor’s Policy Briefing, Barton challenged the church leaders in Iowa to use the power of the pulpit to similarly stir the American people toward moral, religious and even political renewal.

The Pastor’s Policy Briefing was closed to the press, but several attendees took time to speak with WND on the event’s opening evening – which included speeches from Barton, Huckabee and Bachmann:

* “One of the things I found encouraging was that we do still have some godly leaders in this country,” said Tim Batterson, a deacon of Ottumwa Baptist Temple, in Ottumwa, Iowa. “We have people that are willing to step up in the public eye and proclaim the gospel, and they’re using that as the foundation for what they’re doing to lead our country.”

* David Welch, pastor of Arapahoe Christian Church, crossed the river from Arapahoe, Neb., to hear Bachmann speak for the first time: “Her speech as a politician I figured would be political, but she hit strongly on the biblical perspectives of what we’re supposed to be doing. It was awesome. And Mike Huckabee spoke with compassion that we [pastors] have got to start the renewal, and we have to be the ones to reach out.”

* Pastor Alfred Kajer of Allerton Christian Church, in Allerton, Iowa, told WND, “When Barton talked about how active ministers were in the founding of our country, and how 29 of them signed the Declaration of Independence, it encourages me as a minister to know that I’m to be active in more than just my pulpit, but in my community and my state.”

* Joanne Berentson, a deacon’s wife from Siloam Lutheran Church in Paullina, Iowa, took away a sentiment similar to Kajer, saying she was convinced “the answer is in our home communities, and the answers can come from the pulpit.”

* Pastor Kevin Hollinger of First Baptist Church in Algona, Iowa, related, “I think Michele Bachmann’s speech was really encouraging, to ‘pour our lives fully out for Christ’ and every aspect of our lives for His glory.”

* J. Albert Calaway, pastor of First Assembly of God in Indianola, Iowa, summed it up this way: “Every speaker was God-centered, and that’s very encouraging.”

With Gingrich and Barbour on deck for the next day, Bachmann closed the opening night with a challenge to preachers to once again – a la the Black Robes Regiment – be the “voice of freedom” in the U.S.

VISIT GETTIN AFTER LEFTY DOT COM JUST CLICK ON THE GOLD BUTTON

Photobucket

26 Mar

Photobucket

THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW PLAYER
((JUST CLICK ON PLAYER TO LISTEN TO SHOW))


Illegals

Muslims

Democrats

Socialist

Marxist

Communist

what do they all have in common–THEY ALL SHARE THE SAME GOAL

DESTROY AMERICA

26 Mar
Why Did Sen. James Inhofe Propose an End-Run Around the Constitutional Eligibility Requirement for President?
Sen. James Inhofe
453 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3603

Dear Sen. Inhofe,

I am aware of the position you and many members of the legislature have taken on Obama’s ‘question of eligibility’ in that Gov. Lingle said he was born in Hawaii and that’s good enough for you. Well, its not good enough for me. Whether he was born on US soil or not is irrelevant. Basic civics teaches that the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement means born on American soil to two US citizen parents. That both parents be citizens mostly ensures there would be loyalty and allegiance to America alone. Natural born is not “native” born.

I’m convinced that you know the difference, but for the life of me I cannot understand why you along with Mary Landrieu and former OK Senator Don Nickles would presume to interpret the Constitution (which is a violation of the constitution itself) and proffer a bill (108th Congress, 2nd Session S.2128.IS) reducing to a minimum the qualifications for eligibility for the Office of President as any person born in or out of the United States as long as one parent is a citizen.

Thank God and the profound wisdom of our founding fathers your bill was not passed. It does compel me to question why two Oklahoma senators and one Louisiana senator would attempt to pass such a bill that invites and allows foreigners in the very sense of the word with loyalty and allegiance to another country, culture or ideology to attain the highest office in our great nation.

I was shocked, saddened and outraged when I learned about this bill. Ten days earlier I sent you a letter thanking you and telling you how very proud I was of you for refusing to ride your horse in the Tulsa Christmas parade because they dropped the word “Christmas” from the event.  I thought you were a champion of christian America and the values and principles that make us the greatest nation the world has ever known. Now I feel betrayed.

As your constituent in Oklahoma I’m going to insist on an explanation as to why you did this. The number of Americans now questioning Obama’s eligibility is in the millions and I dare say his continuation as putative president has become a constitutional crisis and cries out for attention. What conversations did you have with Nickles and Landrieu in the time frame leading up to February, 2004? 

Was Bobby Jindal discussed? Was Obama discussed? It seems to me this bill was tailor-made to clear the way for Obama, and Jindal too, for that matter, to run for president. 
Had your bill passed, Obama would have met the criteria he is being challenged on today. That it didn’t, proves he did not and never did meet the ‘natural born Citizen’ status as required in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States.

Anxiously awaiting your response I remain, sincerely,

Miki Booth

PATRIOTS :WHAT IS CONGRESS UP TOO? ARE THEY TRYING THEIR BEST TO COVER UP FOR BRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR?  JUST IMAGINE IF OBAMA IS INDEED PROVEN TO BE INELBIGLE TO BE PRESIDENT, JUST IMAGINE THE IMPACT ON OUR LAWS, OUR CONSTITUTION, ON CONGRESS, AND THE DEMOCRAT SOCIALIST PARTY.
QUESTION, IF THIS IN FACT PROVES OUT TO BE TRUE AND OBAMA IS FOUND TO BE A FRUAD –WILL PELOSI-REID-AND THE DNC HEADS ROLL?  WILL THEY END UP IN PRISION ? THIS WOULD BE THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION EVERY PERPERTRADED ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY

22 Mar
Hey liberals: Race card has expired!

We have a crisis of crises in this country and some people continue to make the false claim that the tea-party movement is racist, simply because many of us disagree with the policies of the Obama administration. They also play the race card to try to dismiss President Obama’s leadership deficiencies.

Last week, a reporter asked about some homemade signs at early tea-party rallies, which were offensive toward Obama and which quickly disappeared from subsequent rallies. But the reporter never mentioned the barrage of Bush-bashing by the liberals in the media who made it a sport when Bush was president.

When a black listener to my radio show finally figured out that I am an American black conservative, or ABC, who disagrees with the failed policies of the Obama administration, he did not call me a racist but resorted to calling me “shameless” since I dared to disagree with our black president.

I pointed out to him that some black people can think for themselves and that we all have a right to criticize our elected officeholders. You will notice that I did not refer to them as leaders. That would have been inaccurate.

Recently, Herman Cain won the presidential straw poll at the Tea Party National Policy Summit in Phoenix, Ariz. During an interview last week, a reporter asked if he won because the tea-party people are trying to dispel the accusations of racism. Never mind that this is the third unscientific presidential straw poll he has  won in the last couple of months, along with Red State.com and WHO Radio in Des Moines, Iowa.

And then last week in the WorldNetDaily straw poll, he finished in a statistical tie for first place with Sarah Palin, Ron Paul and Allen West. Since Rep. West is also an ABC, it is highly unlikely that so many people in different straw polls are voting for us to show that they are not racist.

Such a ridiculous conclusion would be an insult to both Rep West and Herman Cain. If people would look at their respective histories, they just might notice a long list of “red meat” accomplishments.

Another reporter asked me last week, “Why do tea-party people like you so much?”

Could it be they liked Herman Cains’s message of less government, free markets, upholding the Constitution and individual responsibility? Can the liberal mind possibly consider that people like Mr Cain because they see some leadership in him? Could the people who are part of this massive citizens’ movement be looking past the color of his skin?

Maybe people like Herman Cain’s common sense ideas about how we get this country back on the right track – because it is clear from the dozens of speeches and town hall meetings he has done across the country that most people feel we are definitely on the wrong track with this administration. That is, everybody feels that way except the liberals and the so-called progressives.

So get over it! The race card has expired! Intelligent thinkers are not buying it.

The expired race card is not going to dismiss the lack of leadership by this president. He has not focused on the right problems. His priorities are politically motivated. He has not surrounded himself with the right people, and he has not put the interest of the American people first.

Most people have gotten past race. They are looking for results.

Excerpts from piece WRITTEN BY”Herman Cain

21 Mar

Video exposes ‘all whites are racist’ teachings
Critics say they’ve never found a more systematic assault on liberty

Think What We Think…Or Else: Thought Control on the American Campus

The “Orwellian program of ideological re-education aimed at coercing students to change their thoughts, habits, and values to conform to a highly specific ideological agenda” was established.

More than 7,000 undergraduates in the Delaware dorms were required to attend training sessions, floor meetings and one-on-one sessions with resident assistants who followed the rules described in internal documents as a “treatment.”

OUR WAY OR THE HIGHWAY (COMMUNISM)

“‘Think What We Think… Or Else’ serves as a reminder to college and university administrators that programs like that established at the University of Delaware are flagrant violations of students’ right to freedom of conscience – and that colleges with programs that emulate UD’s failed effort just might end up as the subject of FIRE’s next documentary,” the organization said.

Foundation officials said they never had encountered a more systematic assault upon the individual liberty, dignity, privacy and autonomy of university students.”

Even Delaware professors Jan Blits and Linda Gottfredson described the program as a type of thuggery.

The mandatory “reprogramming sessions” even had the trappings of a cult
Among the teachings from the Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents was:

“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system.

The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination. …'”

The education program also asserted that “reverse racism” is “a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege.” And “a non-racist” is called “a non-term,” because, the program explains, “The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called ‘blaming the victim’).”

YOU WANT TO SEND YOUR CHILDREN TO COLLEGE –COMMUNIST INDOCTRINATION CLINICS

ALL YOU PARENTS OUT THERE THAT HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED INTO THINKING COLLEGE IS THE ONLY ANSWER FOR YOUR CHILDREN. ALL YOU PARENTS WHO THINK COLLEGE IS GREAT AND YOUR CHILDREN WILL RECEIVE A EXCELLENT EDUCATION. THINK AGAIN,WATCH THE FOLLOWING VIDEO–SENDING YOUR KIDS TO COLLEGE IS A THREAT TO YOUR MORALS,TO YOUR CHILDREN.

COMMUNIST AGENDAS DISGUISED AS COLLEGE EDUCATION

NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION HAS IT’S SOCIALSIT/COMMUNIST CLAWS EMBEDDED DEEP INTO ACADEMIA

Only 9% believe Obama has documented eligibility

21 Mar

Only 9% believe Obama has documented eligibility
Scientific tally shows 2 of 3 like state legislation to require proof

ATTENTION YOU WILL HEAR MUSIC IN THE BACKGROUND

Not even one person in 10 believes Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president of the United States, according to a stunning new scientific poll that also reveals political Independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue.

“The shocking result in this survey is that just 9 percent said they believe Obama has met the requirements to prove he was born in the United States and is therefore qualified to be president,” said Fritz Wenzel, chief of Wenzel Strategies, which conducted the assessment.

“Even when you combine those who say such questions are not valid with those who believe he has satisfied the requirements, it still falls short of equaling the percentage who said he should step forward and prove his birth origin once and for all,” he said.

Wenzel Strategies, an independent public opinion research firm based in Ohio, conducted a nationwide telephone poll using a randomly selected sample of all adults. Thesurvey , including 1,095 respondents, was conducted March 15-17, 2011, and carries a confidence interval of 95 percent and a margin of error of +/- 2.93 percentage points.

“The question of whether Barack Obama is eligible to hold the office of president is remarkable in that so many people are aware of the questions that remain unanswered. The survey shows that 77 percent are aware of the issue, and another 12 percent said they are unsure, which likely means they know a little but not enough to articulate details,” Wenzel said in his analysis of the results.

“Given the level of interest that the American public now devotes to politics, especially in an off-election year, this finding is remarkable. It speaks volumes about Obama’s unwillingness or inability to satisfy this question once and for all,” he said.

It was back in June 2009 when Wenzel asked the simple question, “Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office of president?” and 51.3 percent responded yes.

This month, 77 percent of the Democrats who responded said they are. Nearly 82 percent of the Republicans are, and almost 69 percent of the Independents. Overall, 76.8 percent said yes, and another 11.7 percent said they were unsure. Only 11.5 percent said there were not aware of the questions.

“Half of those surveyed said they believe these questions about Obama’s legitimacy as president are either troubling or should be satisfied by Obama. In fact, more people want Obama to prove his legitimacy – 42 percent – than believe that the lingering questions are not valid – 32 percent,” Wenzel said.

That division is 41.9 percent who say Obama should prove his birth story, including 60.9 percent of Independents, 58.6 percent of Republicans and 13.2 percent of Democrats.

Another 7.9 percent the questions are troubling

“What is most interesting is the response on this question of Independent voters: Fully 61 percent of Independents said they want Obama to prove once and for all his birth origin, which is a higher percentage than even among Republicans. Men are also somewhat more skeptical than women,” Wenzel said.

“At a time when this country faces dramatic problems both here at home and around the world, it does harm to Obama’s credibility and undermines the confidence of the American people to have this question hanging out there,” Wenzel explained. “One can only imagine the storm of controversy that might ensue if we discover definitively after his presidency is over that he was not qualified to hold office. The resignation of Richard Nixon would pale by comparison in terms of undermining public confidence in government.”

“A corollary issue to the Obama birth certificate is the question about Obama’s refusal to release educational records, which could hold some clue as to his birth origin and early citizenship,” Wenzel said. “Two-thirds of all respondents want those records released, while the other third of respondents oppose the release of those records. It remains unclear why Obama will not comply with any requests to show those records to the public.”

Only 26 percent strongly opposed the release of the records. Nearly 50 percent strongly favored release and another 17 percent said the president should release the records.

“The bottom line on these early-life records of Obama is that this issue lives on, regardless of how derisive some have been toward the so-called ‘birther’ movement,” Wenzel said. “Obama supporters, particularly those in the national news media who have protected the president on this issue, have tried to ostracize those who still have doubts about Obama’s birth, but try as they might, they have done little to quell the questions in the minds of the American public. This issue is far from over.”

“Evidence of that springs from the strong support that the national telephone survey found among Americans for state laws that require candidates for president to prove they are constitutionally qualified to hold the office – before they will be allowed to appear on that state’s presidential ballot,” Wenzel said.

“Fully 65 percent said they support such state bills, while just 24 percent said they oppose such state measures. Huge majorities of both men and women agree with these state proposals and it is popular in every region of the nation,” he said.

“The clear implication from this polling data is that Americans like the idea that, in the absence of full disclosure by presidential candidates and a press corps interested enough to ask and pursue tough questions, state governments will do their own vetting of presidential candidates,” he said.

WND has reported that such proposals already have been made in 13 states, although several of the initiatives have been detoured by politics inside of committee meeting rooms.

Another recent poll, of only members of the GOP, said only about 30 percent believe Obama was born in the U.S.

The Public Policy Polling found that only 28 percent of the Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S. while 51 percent do not. Another 21 percent say they are not sure.

“Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window,” Dean Debnam, the president of the Democratic-leaning polling firm, told Politico at the time.

“That view is still widely held in Republican circles,” he said.

Other polls in recent months have shown Americans to be increasingly skeptical of Obama’s official narrative:

* A survey by Angus Reid Global Monitor, a division of Vision Critical Group, in October 2009 found three in 10 people in the U.S. believed Obama to be a foreigner.

“While only 13 percent of Democratic Party supporters believe Obama was not born in the U.S., the proportion rises to 25 percent among independents and 51 percent among Republican Party backers,” the report said.

* Then in January 2010, another WND/Wenzel Poll revealed on the one-year anniversary of Obama’s tenure in office that fully one-third of Americans refused to believe Obama was a “legitimate president,” with another 15.8 percent saying they were not sure.

Barely half the voters, 51.5 percent, said they believed the president legitimate even though he had not yet produced the documentation proving his constitutional eligibility. Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they did not consider him legitimate.

* In May 2010, a WND/Wenzel Poll revealed that 55 percent of Americans wanted Obama to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including “college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation.”

“Asked what should be done should it be found that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be president, 59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed,” the poll’s analysis revealed.

* By last June, other media were beginning to put their toes in the waters of the controversy. A 60 Minutes-Vanity Fair poll revealed only 39 percent of respondents believe Obama was born in Hawaii as he claimed in his book.

“A shocking 63 percent – very nearly two-thirds of us – went out on a limb and stated for the record that we believe in the United States. It’s enough to make you proud to be an American – or 63 percent proud, at any rate.”

But that figure included those who said they believe he was born in Kansas or some other unknown state, which still would conflict with Obama’s story.

* Last August, a poll by CNN said 6 of 10 people were uncertain Obama was born in the U.S. The poll said only 42 percent believe Obama “definitely” was born in the U.S.

The CNN report said that, “Hawaii has released a copy of the president’s birth certificate – officially called a ‘certificate of live birth.’ And in 1961 the hospital where the president was born placed announcements in two Hawaiian newspapers regarding Obama’s birth.”

However, the online image released by the Obama campaign during his presidential race actually is called a “Certification of Live Birth,” and those documents under the rules in the state of Hawaii were available for children not born in the state.

The Constitution requires a president to be a “natural-born citizen,” which is not the same as a “citizen.”

Other Wenzel Poll questions revealed a large majority of Americans – nearly 66 percent, including 86 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of Independents – believe the country is on the wrong track.

They also give Obama a “poor” grade for his job performance, by about the same margin.

And they believe many of the drilling and energy production restrictions in the U.S. now should be lifted and are split on the idea of more nuclear plans.

written by By Bob Unruh WND


Gary Gatehouse Comments

You know folks, if this poll reflects the true mood of the country (birth certificate issue) then why are we not hearing from American people? Why are we not hearing  from congress?  A national call your congressmen campaign should start immediately.  Tell your congressmen and Senators, WE WANT TO SEE OBAMA’S “”REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE”  We do not believe he is an AMERICAN CITIZEN.

Enough is a enough, the usurper has got us into another war font in Libya and he runs off to South America with his family on a vacation (disguised as official business ) all the usurper has done since taking office is campaign ,and vacation!!

Patriots, we are leaderless, we have no representation from either side of the isle when it comes to national policy,Obama’s illegitimate occupation of the White House, taxation YOU NAME IT-we Americans are on our own!.

CALL YOU CONGRESSMEN AND YOUR SENATORS TODAY AND TELL THEM WE WANT TO SEE OBAMA’S VALID,LEGITIMATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE,AND WE WANT TO SEE IT NOW!!

20 Mar

Top shrink: Leftists are mentally ill-The liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population

Just when liberal-leftists thought it was finally “their time” to lead center-right America, kicking and screaming, into a stifling socialist “utopia,” a veteran psychiatrist is making a powerful case that the “hope-and-change” ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

For more than 40 years, Rossiter has diagnosed and treated over 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases, both state and federal, as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist retained by numerous public offices, courts and private attorneys. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter explains with great clarity why the kind of liberalism being displayed by Barack Obama can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says Rossiter. “Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

“A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do,” he says. “A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do.

And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over regulates and overtaxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do.”

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

* creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
* satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

“The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says.

“When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

Patriots-this diagnosis comes from  a man that has for over 40 years, diagnosed and treated over 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist he has examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases, both state and federal, he is  a board-certified forensic psychiatrist that has been retained by numerous public offices, courts and private attorneys.

Dr Rossiter received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

What is really sad-LIBERALISM is DEAD LIBERALS have fallen into a even more mental disorder-SOCIALISM- as apparent from the scenes in past weeks from Madison Wisconsin-these SOCIALIST have but one step left to take–the jump into full blown COMMUNISM ie;

LIBERALISM=SOCIALISM=COMMUNISM

We sane people all know that the final step COMMUNISM is complete and adulterated INSANITY