Archive | February, 2012
26 Feb

THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW 
MR AND MRS MARXIST

TRADE MARTIN SPOOFS ON OBAMA

24 Feb

PELOSI-FULL TIME-PART TIME-NO TIME CATHOLIC
JUDGEMENT DAY WILL MAKE THE FINAL CALL ON HER LIFE

Vatican Demonstration Calls for Nancy Pelosi´s Excommunication

WASHINGTON, DC (Catholic Online) – On Monday afternoon ten members of a group led by Randall Terry, called The Vanguard of St. Catherine of Siena,called for the ex-communication of Nancy Pelosi in a demonstration just outside the Vatican.

They are also asking Archbishop Wuerl of the Archdiocese of Washington, DC to enforce the Pope´s position on the distribution of Communion to pro-abortion politicians which was communicated in a 2004 letter, “Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion,” which he wrote when he was Cardinal Ratzinger.

Terry stated, “Nancy Pelosi has betrayed the Catholic faith, fought to shed innocent blood, and repeatedly voted to take money from Americans to pay for the murder of innocent babies.

“Meanwhile, Washington DC Archbishop Donald Wuerl, has refused to rebuke her for this evil, and also continues to serve her Holy Communion.

“This bill is the most horrific treachery against life since Roe versus Wade. I would hate to be in Nancy Pelosi’s shoes on the Day of Judgment.

“President Obama’s executive order – should it come to that – will not be worth the paper it is written on.”

The Vanguard of St. Catherine of Siena is in Rome calling on various Catholic officials asking for intervention concerning the distribution of Communion to politicians who support abortion. They are requesting more action by the various Apostolic discasteries in requiring American bishops to conform to Canon 915.

Canon 915 refers to the article on “Participation in the Blessed Eucharist” and states, “Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to holy communion.”

pro-life demonstrators will be standing at the Vatican fence in front of St. Peter´s Basilica.
Based on her embrace of a pro-abortion position and her activities in support of the killing of the unborn, the group is calling for the Catholic Church to officially excommunicate Nancy Pelosi.

Based on her embrace of a pro-abortion position and her activities in support of the killing of the unborn, the group is calling for the Catholic Church to officially excommunicate Nancy Pelosi.

WHAT WILL BECOME OF NANCY THE INSANE ONE

THIS WAS THE HEADLINE JUST TWO SHORT YEARS AGO-YET THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONTINUES TO TURN THE OTHER WAY WITH REGARDS TO PELOSI AND HER PUBLICLY REBUKING CATHOLIC CHURCH DOCTRINE THAT IS 100 PERCENT AGAINST ABORTION.

QUESTION MUST BE ASKED -HAS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND IT’S LEADERSHIP BECOME JUST ANOTHER RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION THAT HAS FALLEN TO THE SOCIAL DISEASE  OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS?

TIME WILL TELL EITHER HERE ON EARTH OR IN GOD’S KINGDOM COME JUDGEMENT DAY!!!

22 Feb
KOMRADES
You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how. 
Socialist Democrat Party translation
it’s not the votes that count-it’s who counts the votes  



WE MUST PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO VOTER FRAUD  A MAINSTAY OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY


21 Feb

Duped- you Progressives/socialist/liberals/Marxist whatever you are going by today-make me laugh. According to you and your Liberal friends are the only ones that have any sense any education,and everyone else are just toothless hillbillies.


Your way or the highway right? You know it all right? You attended some left wing College and received  your four year dose of Socialism right?  You absorb your news via Pravda West (ABC-CBS-NBC-CNN-PBS) right?

THE LEFT-WHAT THEY REALLY STAND FOR

Let’s see
1. ABORTION-
2. HATE AMERICA
3. TAX THE HELL OUT OF MOST WHO ACTUALLY EARN A LIVING
4. SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND-TO ALL THE LAY A BOUTS
5. GIVE THE COUNTRY AWAY TO ILLEGALS-AFTER ALL CAN YOU IMAGINE THE MILLIONS OF VOTES THIS 3RD WORLD TRASH WILL PROVIDE SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY-WOW

THE LEFT

whiners
name calling
race card
abortionist
liars
cheats
those who do nothing but want it all -at the expense of those who do actually work
Pseudo intellectuals (who really could not find the back side with both hands)
Feminist
Blame America crowd

WE CONSERVATIVES MUST REMEMBER
LIBERALISM equals SOCIALISM equals COMMUNISM 

THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW

17 Feb
THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW FEB 17TH-2012

A DICTATOR IN AMERICA ?

Photobucket

Obama is on the threshold of establishing himself as a my way or the highway,controlling,manipulating,lying,trashing the constitution dictator.
Photobucket

Who has no problem stomping on the throats of Christians their beliefs, the rights of all Americans. He has shown his true colors time after time and yet over 50 percent of ignorant Americans still march with him and his Marxist ideology.

Photobucket

AMERICA IS IT DOOMED TO REPEAT THE FAILURES OF ALL PAST SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST COUNTRIES?
16 Feb

PayPal, American Express implicated in bank fraud

A former employee of one of the world’s largest international banks who has provided WND with more than 1,000 pages of evidence alleges the Internet giant PayPal and American Express are implicated in an international money-laundering scheme involving hundreds of billions of dollars.


The whistle blower, John Cruz, was a relationship manager in the southern New York region for the London-based global bank HSBC.


“I found many accounts where PayPal and American Express were used as conduits through which hundreds of thousands of dollars were deposited or withdrawn from HSBC customer accounts in a pattern of suspicious transactions that should have been reported to legal authorities under various banking statutes, including the Patriot Act,” Cruz told WND.


Neither PayPal nor American Express responded to WND email and telephone requests for comment.


As WND reported, Cruz has a raft of customer account records he claims are evidence of an international money-laundering scheme by HSBC, which reportedly is under investigation by a U.S. Senate committee.


To illustrate his point, WND and Cruz selected the bank checking account for a particular HSBC commercial account, called “Company XYZ” for the sake of this article, for the time period July 21 through Aug. 20, 2009.


Company XYZ was identified in HSBC records with the following information:


It operated out of a private residence in West Hempstead, New York.

The account owner was identified as being 100 percent owned by a person from Malaysia who had non-resident status in the United States and a permanent address in Malaysia.

The president of the company was identified being a U.S. citizen, born in Malaysian.

The account registration was deficient in any meaningful “Know Your Customer” information except to list for the president of the company the numbers of his national identity card, his New York drivers’ license and his U.S. Passport.

The file described the business as: “WELL KEPT HOME OFFICE, COMPUTER, PHONES, FAX, FILES.”

The file noted that the business was last paid a site visit on 12/17/2008 by the HSBC branch manager in E. Northport, Long Island.

The file listed the annual revenue of the company as $1 million.


“When I went to see this business, the address was a two-story house in Wwst Hempstead,” Cruz said. “I knocked on the door, and an Asian gentleman answered the door. In the house there was a wood coffee table in the living room, a red couch and a metal folding chair – nothing else. In the dining room there was a desk, a chair and a phone.”


Cruz said it was difficult to learn anything about the business, because the Asian gentleman did not speak much English.

“My immediate impression was that this was a fake business,” he said.



“I thought there was something really wrong here. For the amount of transactions I saw going through the account, there no evidence of any business taking place here – no packages, no envelopes, no files, no nothing – just an empty desk with nothing on it. There should have been something going on, and all I found was an Asian gentleman who didn’t speak English.”


For the month from July 21 through Aug. 20, 2009, Company XYZ’s revenue was $1,338,151.21, with withdrawals totaling $1,244,632.35, and an ending balance of $261,170.63.


“These figures made no sense to me,” Cruz said, “unless Company XYZ was a shell company set up fraudulently with the only goal of passing money through the account, with the money received from unspecified sources and dispersed from the account to unspecified sources.”

((REST OF STORY CLICK HERE))

LISTEN TO THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW

14 Feb
President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution.

Roberto CandiaI have recently been asked by a number of different people if I think that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, has committed any offenses that subject him to being impeached by the Congress of the United States. The answer is without a doubt yes because he is repeatedly breached his oath of office. The oath of office of the President of the United States the simple and concise. It reads:

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Instead of living up to that oath, President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution. I believe the President of the United States is well aware of what he is doing, and it is completely intentional. Listed below are what I believe are impeachable offenses and the list continues to grow.

1. President Obama has appointed numerous people to cabinet level positions without the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, as is required by the Constitution. These individuals are given extraordinary power and independent funding, and are not under the scrutiny of Congress. The fact that Obama calls them Czars does not make them legal.

2. The push by President. Obama to pass health care legislation in the Congress of the United States that he was fully aware was unconstitutional. He has continued to use his powers and executive branch of government to implement this legislation despite the fact that a federal judge has declared the entire law unconstitutional, and ordered that it not be implemented.

3. Despite the fact that the United States Senate refused to pass the Cap and Trade bill, the President has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to use regulations to implement key portions of the bill, including those regulating so-called greenhouse gases. Obama himself has acknowledged that this will force energy prices in this country to skyrocket. He is taking these actions in direct defiance of the will of the people of the United States, the will of Congress, and the Constitution.

4. Through the Department of the Interior Obama has placed a moratorium on offshore oil drilling or exploration off both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States and in parts of the Gulf of Mexico. He is also prohibited new drilling exploration in any states in the United States. These actions by the Department of Interior have continued in direct defiance of several court orders issued by a federal judge in New Orleans, Louisiana the declared that the department had no authority to issue such a moratorium. In fact the Secretary of the Department of the Interior has been held in contempt by the same judge.

5. Instead of allowing American companies to drill for oil domestically, Obama has betrayed the American people and authorized loans of billions of dollars to countries like Brazil and Mexico so that they can drill for oil, and then sell that oil to the United States. This will dramatically increase our dependence on foreign nations such as Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and even Libya that do not serve the interest of America or the American people.

6. President Obama has abdicated his responsibility to enforce the laws of the United States against illegal immigration. He has virtually declared our southern border an open border by declaring certain areas of federal land in states like Arizona as off-limits to federal, state, and local authorities. This is despite the fact that these areas are being used to bring in thousands of illegal immigrants, massive amounts of drugs, and also being used by foreign terrorists to infiltrate the United States. He has also ordered the border patrol not to arrest most illegal immigrants entering the country, and has stopped deportation proceedings against thousands of people in this country illegally. He is bypassing the Congress of the United States which has sole authority over immigration matters.

7. The President and his Atty. Gen. Eric Holder have clearly violated their oath of office by joining with foreign countries in a lawsuit against the sovereign state of Arizona to stop it from enforcing the federal immigration laws.

8. President Obama has ordered the Federal Communications Commission to adopt regulations giving the federal government control of the Internet and its contents, including providing Obama with a kill switch that gives him authority to shut down the Internet if he sees fit. This is in direct violation of a decision by the United States Supreme Court that the FCC has no Constitutional authority to control the Internet.

9. One of the paramount responsibilities of the President of the United States and his executive branch of government is to enforce and defend laws adopted by Congress unless they are declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. Obama has decided that he should ignore this Constitutional mandate, and that as President he is more powerful than either the Congress of the United States or the Supreme Court. He has unilaterally declared that the Defense of Marriage Act passed by the Congress is unconstitutional, and further declared that he will not have the Justice Department defend it against lawsuits. He has essentially said that he is the supreme ruler of the United States, and that the Congress and the Federal Judiciary are irrelevant.

10. It has recently been learned that acting through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms the Obama administration has been involved for the past several months in getting legitimate and law-abiding gun store owners along our southern border to supply weapons to straw buyers that the government knew would deliver them to the drug cartels in Mexico. This was billed as a sting operation against the cartels when in fact it was designed to produce fraudulent data showing that large numbers of weapons were going from the United States to the Mexican drug dealers. This data was then to be used, and is being used, to try to justify new gun control regulations to limit the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms. It has nothing to do with arresting members of the drug operations. The administration has, in effect, armed our enemies, and one border patrol agent has already been killed by one of these weapons. Now, he intends to impose gun control laws by Executive order so he will not have to deal with Congress.

11. The President of the United States is not authorized by the Constitution to take our nation to war without the consent of the Congress of the United States. The only exception to this is the authority granted to the President by Congress under the War Powers Act. This law allows the President to take immediate action without the consent of Congress if there is an imminent threat to the security of the United States, or its citizens. Although there was clearly no such imminent threat caused by the Civil War in Libya, the President committed members of the United States military to combat missions in a foreign country without the consent of Congress. He based his authority on a United Nations resolution, and a resolution by the Arab League.

12. Last but not the least, of my dirty dozen of impeachable offenses, is the fact that since taking office the President has used executive orders, laws pushed through Congress in the dark of night, and administrative actions by his departments to nationalize and control automobile manufacturers, banks, insurance companies, and portions of the healthcare industry. This is designed to take our country from a free enterprise economy to a socialist economy. There is absolutely no authority in the Constitution of te United States that allows the President to do this.

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution provides as follows:

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

I contend that among those high crimes and misdemeanors is the intentional violation of the oath of office administered to the President and all other federal officials. In fact, federal law at 5 U.S.C. 7311 specifically provides that violation of the oath of office includes advocating the overthrowing of our constitutional form of government. This is specifically declared a criminal offense in 18 U.S.C. 1918 and is punishable by both a fine and imprisonment.

In the 12 areas I mentioned in the paragraphs above I firmly believe that Obama, Eric Holder, and numerous other members of his administration have gone beyond just advocating the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. They are actually engaged in making it happen, and as a result should be impeached and convicted.

Will there be an impeachment and conviction in the current Congress? Probably not, since it takes a two thirds vote in the House of Representatives to impeach, and a two thirds vote in the Senate to convict. With Harry Reid and the progressives still in control of the Senate, and many of them guilty of some of the same impeachable offenses, they will resist it.

However, we are the American people and we still have a right to control our government, and the people elected to represent us. Therefore, I am personally calling on the conservative members the House of Representatives to bring this action based on the grounds I have enumerated so that the American people can understand what is really at stake here. Then “we the people,” can make our voices heard.

— Michael Connelly, retired constitutional lawyer

HAVE A LISTEN TO THE “GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW”
JUST CLICK ON THE PLAYER BELOW

14 Feb

The question must be asked “who is responsible for the mess our country is in”

How did we as a nation elect a Marxist to the office of President of the United States


Nobody held a gun to our head


Nobody threatened our families

WAKE UP AMERICA IT IS TIME TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK FROM THE MARXIST LEFT
OBAMA NATIONAL POLICE FORCE
(ENFORCERS OF HIS MARXIST AGENDA)

BEST PAYING PART TIME JOB IN AMERICA

11 Feb
BEST PAYING PART TIME JOB IN AMERICA

How many days per year does the average American work ?
The average American worker:
52 weeks x 5 Days/week = 260 Days
4 weeks vacation/year = -16 Days*
10 holidays/year= -10
3 sick days/year= -3
3 personal days/year= -3
Total days worked 228 Days/ year
* 4 weeks vacation AFTER 4-5 years of employment
Work day is 8 hours WORK with 1/2 hr. unpaid lunch and 2/15 minutes break/day

How many days per year does a teacher work?

The average teacher:
School year = 180 days
14 Holidays/year= -14
5 personal days/year= -5
7 Sick days/year- -7
? Vacation days/year= ? *
Total days worked 154 Days/ year
*I have heard rumors teachers get vacation time as well but not confirmed
Work day is 7 hours including a 1/2 hour PAID lunch and one hour FREE period/day

You may ask what is the national average salary for school teachers

((The National Center for Education Statistics)

The average salary for public school teachers in 2009–10 was $55,350, about 3 percent higher than in 1990–91, after adjustment for inflation. The salaries of public school teachers have generally maintained pace with inflation since 1990–91.

THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION AND THEIR POLITICAL POWER

It’s well known that education unions are perennial political powerhouses, nationally and locally. In his groundbreaking study of teachers unions, Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America’s Public Schools, Terry Moe argues that “by comparison to other interest groups, and certainly to those with a direct stake in public educational ”parents, taxpayers, even administrators — the teachers unions are unusually well equipped to wield power.” 

Consider this



Fortune magazine has consistently ranked the National Education Association in the top 15 of its Washington Power 25 list for influence in the nation’s capital.


Over the last 20 years, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has given more than $28 million in campaign contributions; the National Education Association (NEA) has given almost $31 million. That’s almost $60 million, more than any other organization,but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. 

At the state level, the AFT and NEA combined to spend an additional $61.8 million on candidates and expenditures for ballot initiatives in 2008 alone. Plus, teachers unions spend millions more on uncoordinated expenditures and get-out-the-vote efforts.

According to The Heritage Foundation, through July 2010, unions spent almost three times as much money on campaign ads as all corporations combined.



According to the Reason Foundation, the California Teachers Association has spent more than $200 million on ballot initiatives, candidates for state and local office, and lobbying. They used this money not only to argue against education reforms, but also to defeat healthcare reform measures and to defeat bills which would have prevented voter fraud.


In retaliation for Washington, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty’s commitment to education reform — and in an effort to remove the effective school chancellor, Michelle Rhee, who weakened tenure and got rid of bad teachers — the American Federation of Teachers dumped more than a million dollars into the 2010 Democratic Mayoral primary between Fenty and Vincent Gray.


Colorado saw sweeping education reforms come to the state in the form of weakened tenure and increased merit pay. How did the Colorado Education Association respond? By pumping almost a million dollars into the state. The money went almost exclusively to Democratic candidates and Democrat-backed proposals and ballot initiatives.


The head of the Chicago Teachers Union had this warning to any mayoral candidate in the 2011 mayor’s race who didn’t toe the teacher’s line: “I think the opportunity is to throw the weight of 30,000 members and their families and students and teachers. I mean, we’re looking at maybe 800,000 people we could affect on some level.”


Due to their massive base, and the massive dues that they charge, teachers unions can both mobilize voters and spend huge sums of money to defeat ballot initiatives and candidates that they don’t like
If you’ve ever wondered why education reform is slow in the offing, now you know: Politicians have real reason to fear crossing the unions. As Terry Moe put it, “when all is said and done, the power of the unions to block change is the single most important thing that anyone needs to know about the politics of American education.”
Unions Don’t Reflect Members’ Politics


The officials who wield teachers unions’ enormous political clout do so at the expense of their members, who frequently disagree with union bosses’ political agendas.

Consider the numbers above: Of the almost $60 million in campaign contributions distributed by the NEA and the AFT, more than $56 million went to Democrats. That means that roughly 95 percent of the unions’ money went toward Democratic candidates.

 THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION UNION

RUNS OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM OR SHOULD WE CALL THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM for what it really is SOCIALIST INDOCTRINATION CLINICS. 

The National Education Association is nothing more than a political arm of the Socialist Democrat Party conducting the Democrats Socialist agenda in our schools and disguising their agenda as EDUCATION..


Wake up America, The National Education Association and the Socialist Democrat Party are working overtime to brainwash our children.

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TO LATE
THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW SHINING THE LIGHT OF TRUTH ON THE SOCIALIST LEFT
WE BROADCAST THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES
CLICK ON PLAYER BELOW TO LISTEN TO CURRENT OR PAST SHOWS
7 Feb
Chivalrous Men and the Victim-Princess Complex

I recently came across an article sporting the irresistible title, A Nation of Little Princesses. Author Christopher Healy explores the archetype of the princess, which he asserts “is one of the longest-lived in all of literary history.”

My first reaction was to think, “Here’s some Neanderthal guy trying to peddle outdated gender stereotypes.” But Healy points to the fact that the Disney Corporation has assembled a Princess brand consisting of eight animated film heroines including Cinderella, Snow White, Pocahontas, Belle of Beauty of the Beast, and others. In 2003 the Princess line racked up an astonishing $2.5 billion in sales, up from a mere $300 million in 2001.

And that’s just for starters. “We’ve gone beyond the dress-up and toys, and begun to look at the brand as a lifestyle, filling out all the other things girls need in life,” according to Mary Beech, Disney director of franchise management. Things girls need in life?

Healy, proud dad of a three-year-old girl, notes with an equal mix of astonishment and horror, “The ease and rapidity with which a princess obsession can take hold of a young girl’s psyche is mind-blowing.”

Eventually those little Jennifers and Bethanies grow up, go to college, and enroll in their first Women’s Studies course. There they learn that the kiss by their Prince Charming really represents non-consensual sexual assault, that Belle’s Beast is a closet bodice-ripper, and that the fable of the Princess talking to the Green Frog at the side of the well is an allegory of serial rape.

But the Women’s Studies gurus explain they can still make their dreams of tiaras and sequin-studded dresses come true: “Join the Sisterhood, and we’ll turn you into a real princess!”

According to the feminist fable, women were kept under heel for so many millennia that members of the fairer sex need to play “catch-up.” So now women should be the beneficiaries of an ever-expanding array of legal protections, government programs, commercial products, and lifestyle options. That’s the Victim-Princess Complex.

Before long these Wicked Witches of the North have cast a spell on their Little Pretties. These young women soon graduate from college believing that women are paid less for the same work, that women were routinely excluded from medical research, and a multitude of other tragedies that have befallen womankind. Victimization has become a mainstay of their self-identity.

It’s not just the feminist propaganda mill that endlessly replays the woman-as-victim mantra. Chivalrous men, acting out their fantasies of the White Knight in Shining Armor, are guilty as well.

Pick up a copy of your local newspaper and you will see articles – usually written by male reporters and columnists – that reinforce the notion of the downtrodden female. Accounts of women who are stressed-out, undervalued, and abused form the staple of daily news reporting.

Recently I attended a conference where a speaker blandly made the claim that 60 million women around the world had “disappeared.” He didn’t bother to offer any details or proof. And he certainly didn’t say anything about men who were never heard from again.

I imagine that catering to women’s insecurities makes these men feel gallant and proud. But chivalry is defined as being “considerate and courteous to women.” Slanting and distorting the truth – that’s chicanery, not chivalry.

Yet there’s a downside to the Princess-Victim Complex.

Myrna Blyth, former editor of Ladies Home Journal, reveals how women’s magazines turn female victimization into a hard sell for the latest beauty products or weight control program. Blyth decries how these magazines promote “narcissism as an advanced evolutionary stage of female liberation. Me, me, me, means you’re finally free, free, free.”

But the problem goes beyond self-absorbed narcissism.

In his Nation of Little Princesses article, Christopher Healy quotes a father who observes, “Well, that’s the magic of Disney: It’s addictive. It’s like crack for 5-year-olds.”

So the Victim-Princess Complex begins to resemble a dysfunctional habit in which the negative feelings of being a victim require ever-larger “fixes” for women to feel good about themselves. And those fixes come with a hefty price tag. Princesses “only find true happiness once they’re married off with royal expense accounts,” Healy laments.

These women are undoubtedly the most prosperous, pampered, and protected group in the history of the world. But they would still have you believe that women aren’t getting a fair shake.

What is the truth of feminism? A fairy tale come true, or a royal deception that appeals to the most primitive instincts of men and women alike?

This is what the US male is up against-it has been festering for a long time. We are just as much fault for this as are women. Respecting women is not being a wimp-but letting them dictate your every awake moment is. I thought I would never use this word self-esteem we referring to men–I always connected that word with women. But younger men today–have been told so many things-by the media-school-parents that they don’t know how to act.

“Must get in touch with your feminine side” who in the hell came up with that –40 years ago that quote did not exist–your feminine side what the hell does that mean anyway? Not too long ago I opened a door at a grocery store for a young woman, she looked at me and said ” I am perfectly capable opening my own doors” well in my mind I said that is it–no more being helpful for the younger females–they want to have it all ——–well they got it!!

The Feminist movement has destroyed all respect between males and females-now it is “I can do anything you can do”–and males now believe it!!! I am sorry but there is a difference between males and females–(physically)–mentally you can change that belief in the male mind and the feminist have succeeded in doing just that…

Feminist movement has destroyed the US male–(there are some that have not been influenced by the propaganda taught) and that is because of men who taught their boys to be men–passing down what manhood is from their fathers and grandfathers…

My father held two sometimes three jobs to support his family–never complained or whined

He respected woman-open doors for them-stood up when a woman entered the room. Did not use curse words around woman (females) and as far as that goes around his children. Today the F word is used everywhere-around woman-children who cares

He could repair his own car -did his own repairs on our home-cut the grass-all those tasks that were required to keep our home in good condition.

He taught his three sons to hunt-to fish-to respect woman and to help them when they needed it-to respect our grandparents-older people-our teachers and taught us about our country (he fought in WWII as well as all my uncles) respect the flag, why we have our freedoms-who protected them.

My father always had time for us–when I went to war (Vietnam) how I was raised, by my mother and father how they encouraged me to play football,baseball, how my father taught me how to take pain (through example) how to stand on my own two feet, these all got me through that war and home in one piece.

My mother and father were married 49 years before he died, they stayed together through thick and thin–raised four children on a workers pay.

Today a lot of what I have listed above is missing in our society,divorce and the split up of the American family has contributed to much of the ills our nation suffers from today. American men must revisit those attributes that made American men the envy of the whole world….

Corny you say—well what I am saying is coming from a 62 year old. I have seen the flowering of the feminist movement and its negative impact on the American Male and Female, and as an American Male I do not like it.