Archive | April, 2012

What others see plainly, LIBERALS ignore

30 Apr

I remember asking dad about Castro when I was about 9 years old. I asked, “Is Castro a good guy or bad?”

My family had run this store for generations. They said we now own the hardware store, you work for us. And that nice, large four-bedroom home you own…it is now our property also, and…you can move yourself and five children into two rooms of the house, because others are moving in with you.”

The lesson learned from this discussion, is a lesson most Americans refuse to hear. Political leaders can lie about their agenda and once in office…they can take totally unexpected turns.

If you had asked us three years ago if we thought General Motors would be nationalized, we would have never believed it.. We could never contemplate a country where the rule of law, the most fundamental building block of a justice society…would be evaporating, just like it did in Castro’s Cuba in the early 1960’s.
But the news of injustice keeps increasing. Black Panthers are not charged with wrong doing by the U.S. Department of Justice…because their crimes are against whites. The bondholders of GM are stripped of their assets…without due process by the government! Governmental leaders are bribed in full daylight…only to have all investigation of the crimes stifled…by the Attorney General.


The U.S. borders are over run with crime and illegal activity, and the leaders in D.C. act as if it is important to protect the lawbreakers….while
the innocent are killed and over run.

When local communities attempt to enforce the law, they are ridiculed…and threatened as racists and bigots. They are sued by the very administration…entrusted with enforcing the law.
Without the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution is a sham!!
Without the rule of law, our beloved America is swiftly becoming a country where only the well connected and politically powerful will be safe. As Michelle Malkin has so eloquently explained in her recent book…a culture of corruption has replaced honest government.

The only way this problem will be fixed, is by massive citizen action. All honest citizens that want to be treated equally, must come together…and demand that the favoritism, the bribes, the uneven enforcement of law…end now!! And yes, it can happen here.

WAKE UP AMERICA WE HAVE A COMMUNIST IN THE WHITE HOUSEM.
 



Dad said…he couldn’t tell!! This was about 1955. We were living in Louisiana …at the time. Dad was in the Army there.

Cuba was fairly close and in the news a lot. The Cubans were asking the same question!

Ike was president.

This past July, we had the pleasure of sharing a summer barbecue with a refugee from Cuba . Our dinner conversation was starkly different than most.

This refugee came to the United States as a young boy in the early 1960’s. His family was more fortunate than most, as they were able to bring a suitcase…and $100 when they fled Castro’s newly formed revolutionary paradise.

Our dinner consisted of all-American fare: hamburgers, potato salad, watermelon and fresh ears of sweet corn. This is a menu shared with family and friends nationwide…while celebrating the birth of our beloved America …on the Fourth of July.

We began with a simple discussion about our country, and the direction it has taken since Barack Obama came to power. We shared the usual complaints about the sour economy and liberal social engineering emanating from the rulers in Washington .

But then he said it. The sentence came naturally. I assume it was unplanned. But it carried the weight of a freight train. “You know when Castro took power, none of us knew he was a Communist”.

We sat stunned. He continued, “Yes, we all thought he was a patriot, a nationalist. Before the revolution he didn’t sound like a radical.”

The comparison at this point was easy, and I interjected,
“You mean just like Barack Obama?”

He responded; “Yes, just like Barack Obama.”
He continued, “We were all shocked as the government just continued to grab more power. First they said the revolution is over, so please turn in your guns. We all complied.”

I remember my uncle saying after it started; Castro will only nationalize some of the big industries. He will never come and take our family hardware store!! But that is exactly what happened. Castro started with the sugar mills and the large industries, but they eventually came and knocked on the door of our family hardware store.

Advertisements

Black mob beats white man to near death

24 Apr

Victim fussed at kids playing basketball in street (WKRG-TV) MOBILE, Alabama –
Mobile police need your help to catch a mob that beat Matthew Owens so badly that he’s in critical condition.

According to police, Owens fussed at some kids playing basketball in the middle of Delmar Drive about 8:30 Saturday night. They say the kids left and a group of adults returned, armed with everything but the kitchen sink.

Police tell News 5 the suspects used chairs, pipes and paint cans to beat Owens.
Owens’ sister, Ashley Parker, saw the attack. “It was the scariest thing I have ever witnessed.” Parker says 20 people, all African American, attacked her brother on the front porch of his home, using “brass buckles, paint cans and anything they could get their hands on.”

Police will only say “multiple people” are involved.

(((GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS))
Okay, where is Eric Holder, how about the FBI, where is the mainstream media?

How about the Obama phone call to the family?
ALL MISSING

How about the outrage from white folks? MISSING

THIS IS WHERE WE ARE IN AMERICA TODAY-WHITE FOLKS JUST HUNKER DOWN AND KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT

A sorry damn mess for sure!!!
 



Black mob beats white man to near death LISTEN TO THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW CONSERVATIVE TALK/COMMENTARY BEST ON THE WWW

SO YOU ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR OBAMA

23 Apr

THE OBAMA REGIME FULL OF SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST/PROGRESSIVES/MARXIST AND CROOKS


Just in case you might have wondered how their ineptitude affected their lives after they ruined so many dreams and lives … let me refresh your memory:

Where are Jim, Tim and Franklin now? Here’s a quick look into the three former Fannie Mae executives who brought down Wall Street.

Franklin Raines – was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae. Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae when auditing discovered severe irregularities in Fannie Mae’s accounting activities. Raines left with a “golden parachute valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Government filed suit against Raines when the depth of the accounting scandal became clear.

Tim Howard – was the Chief Financial Officer of Fannie Mae. Howard “was a strong internal proponent of using accounting strategies that would ensure a “stable pattern of earnings” at Fannie. Investigations by federal regulators and the company’s board of directors since concluded that management did manipulate 1998 earnings to trigger bonuses. Raines and Howard resigned under pressure in late 2004. Howard’s Golden Parachute was estimated at $20 Million!

Jim Johnson – A former executive at Lehman Brothers and who was later forced from his position as Fannie Mae CEO. Investigators found that Fannie Mae had hidden a substantial amount of Johnson’s 1998 compensation from the public, reporting that it was between $6 million and $7 million when it fact it was $21 million.” Johnson is currently under investigation for taking illegal loans from Countrywide while serving as CEO of Fannie Mae. Johnson’s Golden Parachute was estimated at $28 Million.

WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

FRANKLIN RAINES?
Raines works for the Obama Campaign as his Chief Economic Advisor.

TIM HOWARD?
Howard is a Chief Economic Advisor to Obama under Franklin Raines.

JIM JOHNSON?
Johnson was hired as a Senior Obama Finance Advisor and was selected to run Obama’s Vice Presidential Search Committee.


Our government is rotten to the core ! Are we stupid or what? Vote in 2012 … it’s the most important election of our lives !

 

Gary Gatehouse Comments

So you are going to vote Democrat-so you think Obama is the man.
Go ahead and vote Democrat, you will be voting for a SOCIALIST, your party (Democrat) is SOCIALIST.You women out there that just cannot get enough of cradle to grave Socialist/Obama agenda, your sugar daddy.
You that vote for Obama are saying to the rest of “WE THE PEOPLE” you no longer support the Constitution, you have no faith in capitalism, you are throwing your country under the bus in favor of a Socialist!!
SO BE IT, we will remember all you that have turned your back on our great country, we will remember how you sold out the greatest country on the face of the earth, we will remember who you are and what you collectively stand for, SOCIALISM.
WE CAN NO LONGER REFER TO YOU AS AMERICANS you have given that all up to support a party and a person that does not stand for WE THE PEOPLE!!!




 

AMERICAN MEN -GENDER REVERSAL

20 Apr
LEADERSHIP
AMERICAN MALE TODAY-SHOWING HIS FEMININE SIDE

More women are achieving primary breadwinner status among U.S. households, as our colleagues at

In what the

Women’s increased focus on career is reflected in their education rates as well. Women now surpass men in college enrollment and graduation. 36% of women ages 25 to 29 hold a bachelor’s degree, compared with just 28% of men in the same age group, says Pew Research.

Despite their educational and career strides, it’s the same unequal story when it comes to pay. In 2010 full-time or salaried women workers had weekly earnings of $669, while their male counterparts pulled in $829 a week. However, today’s young workers have it better than their older counterparts. Among all workers ages 16 to 34, women’s earnings are more than 80% of men’s, but that number drops to 80% or less for women 35 to 64, according to the survey.

Women might be increasingly career-driven, but it’s not at the expense of marriage and family — they still want to have it all. The share of women 18 to 34 for whom having a successful marriage is important has risen to 37% — up nine percentage points from 28% in 1997. For young men, on the other hand, that number dropped — from 35% in 1997 to 29% now. According to the survey, both men and women rank parenting high on the list of priorities.

These Gen Y-ers might view marriage and family as important, but the overall trend shows that people are marrying and having children later. Partly because 20-somethings, burdened with student debt and poor employment prospects, have fared poorly in the recent financial crisis. Will their dual priorities — of career and family — merely be delayed compared with their parents’ generation? Or do they have unrealistic expectations?Daily Ticker reported this week. So it follows that the younger generation of women are placing a higher priority on work than men.Pew Research Center calls a gender reversal, more young women than men say a high-paying career is a top life priority, according to survey findings released Thursday. Two-thirds (66%) of women ages 18 to 34 rated career high on their list of life priorities, compared with 59% of young men. In 1997, 56% of young women and 58% of men felt the same way. 

AMERICAN MEN ARE BEING PUSHED OUT OF THE JOB MARKET
GENDER REVERSAL

GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS: 

YOUNGER AMERICAN MEN TODAY, are immature, refuse to accept responsibility, have no set goals, and I hate to say this most have no self-esteem! 

That last statement would have resonated back in earlier decades when one referred to young women. Seems the American feminist revolution has achieved it’s goals of demeaning males,lowering males expect ions of themselves.  

American men today (not all) are what we would refer to a small percentage of males in past decades as (pussies) or wimps.

Why has the American male fallen to less than bread winner status?

One reason more women attend college today than males, males have no set goals,no driving force to achieve and bottom line many  

American males today are physically and mentally LAZY!!

Bottom Line–YOU YOUNGER GUYS HAD BETTER WAKE UP THE AMERICAN DREAM IS LEAVING THE STATION AND MOST PASSENGERS ON THAT TRAIN ARE “”””SELF MOTIVATED,HARD WORKING,INTELLIGENT WOMEN””””!!!!! 

13 Apr

Right Wing Group Slams HBO’s Angry Boys For ‘Sexualizing Children’ With Girl Sucking On Penis Cup

Cult comedy Angry Boys aims to shock viewers with its mockumentary style humor, but one right wing group thinks the HBO hit has gone too far and accuses a recent episode of being “akin to showing child pornography.”


The most offensive scene depicts a young girl sucking on a bright pink penis-shaped cup during a sketch about a Japanese mother (played by Australian star and director Chris Lilley) who forces her skateboarding son to act gay as a marketing tactic.
“It’s difficult to imagine that HBO would go any lower,” Dan Gainor of the Culture and Media Institute tells RadarOnline.com in an exclusive interview.


“HBO’s new show Angry Boys includes one episode so foul that they have a little girl drinking from a giant cup made from a replica penis. Oral sex ‘humor’ involving a young child shows precisely where the left’s mind is really at,” he fumed.


In an article on the Institute’s website the group ascertains that: “Promoting child pornography is a comedic way is much more shocking and outrageous than funny.”


Gainor, who recently criticized Jennifer Lopez’s new video for being a skanky bid to retain her fame “despite her fading relevance,” is not surprised that HBO would air a show like Angry Boys.




WRITTEN BY: Debbie Emery
RADAR ON LINE.COM
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/04/angry-boys-right-wing-group-slams-hbo-sexualizing-children

GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS
Patriots, this just another example of the perverted mind set of those that own and produce HBO shows etc.  Bill Maher another example, all you Christians out there, all of you folks that profess your moral upbringings, all you folks out there with children,grandchildren. Let me ask you a question, “DO YOU WATCH MOVIES ON HBO, DO YOU WATCH HBO SPECIALS ETC? Next question why are you supporting HBO by using their perverted service,why are you supporting those that would undermine your morals?

I do not and will not watch HBO under any circumstance, that includes sports presentations etc.

Don’t you think it is about time we Christians, we that have children,grandchildren, we who profess to be good Christians with moral values, boycott HBO, write those sponsors that advertise on HBO and tell them “WE WILL NOT WATCH OR SUPPORT HBO NOR WILL WE USE THOSE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES THAT SPONSOR THE PERVERTED IMMORAL HBO TELEVISION CHANNEL (S).


Gary Gatehouse
host
Gettin after Lefty Show
Conservative talk that refuses to be politically correct

“WE BROADCAST THE TRUTH,REGARDLESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES”




9 Apr
CONGRESSMEN FEARS OBAMA POWER GRAB
(MARTIAL LAW)

A White House order updating federal emergency powers has raised alarm among some conservative commentators, and U.S. Rep. Sandy Adams, that President Barack Obama is attempting to grab unconstitutional powers.

A columnist with The Washington Times declared the mid-March order — an update of a 60-year-old document outlining the president’s authority in a national emergency — “stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution.” The conservative Drudge Report website linked to it with the headline, “Martial Law?”

And Adams, R-Orlando, said it “leaves the door open for the president to give himself control over American resources during both times of peace, and national crisis.”

So Adams filed a nonbinding resolution specifying what Obama cannot do with the order — including institute a draft, confiscate personal property and “force civilians to engage in labor against their will or without compensation.”

But legal experts from both ends of the political spectrum said it’s a stretch — at best — to believe the order allows any of those powers.

As written, the executive order outlines the powers the president can exercise “in the event of a potential threat,” such as mobilizing for war. These range from the mundane, such as preparing disaster plans, to more robust authority that includes taking control of civil transportation and forcing U.S. companies to prioritize defense contracts.

All this has been on the books for decades. Experts on national-security law say the big difference between what Obama signed and the version in place since President Bill Clinton was in office is reference to the Department of Homeland Security, which wasn’t around then.

“It’s valid to be concerned that the president has too many powers that are justified by national-defense needs,” said Benjamin Friedman, a defense expert with the libertarian Cato Institute. “But this executive order doesn’t change much compared to prior executive orders that Republican and Democratic presidents have put in place.”

The last time the order was invoked in a major way was in January 2001, when Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush both utilized it to direct emergency supplies of electricity and natural gas to California in order to prevent blackouts.

“No one hollered dictator then,” said Peter Raven-Hansen, who teaches national-security law at George Washington University.

Adams, in a brief interview, said Obama’s order could unconstitutionally expand the president’s authority and cited as an example its inclusion of a section of the Stafford Act, which defines the government’s role in dealing with disasters.

“It is my first [term] in Congress. I know we are responsible for oversight,” she said.

But the section of the Stafford Act deals primarily with disaster preparation and training. In regard to civilian labor, it requires workers on construction projects be paid fair market wages and overtime if they work more than 40 hours in a week.

When asked how this could equate to civilians being forced into labor, an Adams spokeswoman said the congresswoman was trying to ensure there was “no misunderstanding as to the powers of the executive.”

WRITTEN BY:Mark K. Matthews, Washington Bureau
ORLANDO,SENTINEL

6 Apr
NEWS FLASH-HEADLINE
The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal

Sheriff Joe expands Obama probe to Hillary supporters
Obama campaign, DNC accused of voter fraud in 2008


Based on interviews WND conducted with insiders in Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, Sheriff Joe Arpaio has decided to expand the scope of his law enforcement investigation into President Obama’s eligibility to include evidence and affidavits documenting alleged criminal activity by the Obama campaign in the 2008 Democratic Party primary race.


Hollywood film producer Bettina Viviano and Hollywood-based digital photographer Michele Thomas have given Arpaio’s investigators the names of dozens of Hillary Clinton supporters willing to come forward with evidence and affidavits. Among their claims is that the Clintons were the first to charge Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and that his birth certificate is a forgery.


Moreover, the Hillary supporters identified by Viviano and Thomas have argued that the pattern of questionable and possibly illegal activity suggests that the alleged act of producing forged birth certificate documentation for Obama may have been merely more of the same.


As WND reported, Viviano claims she heard Bill Clinton say that Obama is not eligible to be president.


‘Not a partisan investigation’


Arpaio has insisted his investigation into Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is not a partisan investigation. It was triggered, he noted, by a petition presented to him in August signed by some 250 members of the Surprise Tea Party in Surprise, Ariz.


“I’m just doing what I took an oath of office to do – enforce the law,” Arpaio told a combined meeting of the Surprise Tea Party and the Sun City West Tea Party on Saturday attended by over 1,100 people. “I report to the people. I’m not accusing the president of any crime. We used no taxpayer money, and I listen to the complaints brought to me. I don’t throw citizen complaints in the wastebasket.”


Arpaio said he began the investigation with the goal of proving Obama’s birth certificate legitimate.


“I feel very strongly as the constitutional, chief law enforcement officer for this county,” Arpaio told the Tea Party audience. “I wanted to do everything to clear the president of the United States. I wanted to be the guy who stood up here and said that birth certificate is legitimate – leave the president alone. But it didn’t work out that way.”


As WND reported, at a press conference March 1 in Phoenix, Arpaio announced his investigators have probable cause to believe Obama’s birth certificate and his Selective Service Registration form are forgeries.


“The last I heard, if you forged documents, that’s a violation of law,” he quipped to the tea party audience. “If you did it, you’d be in trouble big time.”


Chaos in 2008


Viviano, working with screenplay writer and director Gigi Gaston, produced in 2008 a documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced,” based on interviews from participants in Democratic Party primary caucuses. They accuse the Obama administration of illegitimate and illegal acts, including threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents and busing in voters in exchange for meals.


“This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign,” Gaston and Viviano write on the “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008 website, which features a 40-minute preview of the documentary.


“We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign ‘Chicago Machine’ dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of ‘change’ from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote.”


Arpaio’s investigation has already uncovered evidence of intimidation by Obama supporters in an attempt to suppress media coverage of the birth certificate and eligibility issues.


A memo published by the Hillary for President campaign March 4, 2008, noted the following specific accusations of irregularities and voter intimidation allegedly committed by the Obama campaign:


    Irregularities: Prematurely taking precinct convention packets by the Obama campaign;


    Voter intimidation: Lockout of Clinton caucus goers by the Obama campaign; and


    Obama supporters filling out precinct convention sign-in sheets during the day and submitting them as completed vote totals at caucuses, a practice explicitly forbidden by Democratic Party rules.


The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal,” reflecting “a wanton disregard for the caucus process.”


Hillary: continuing threat to Obama


In the 2010 mid-term elections, the blue-collar voters who supported Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign abandoned the Democratic Party led by Obama.


A Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll after the November 2010 elections showed Democrats’ support from white, non-college-educated male voters dropped 12 percent from 2008, with only 29 percent of blue-collar men supporting the Democrats in 2010, down from 41 percent in 2008, as reported by TheHill.com.


Last November, prominent Democratic pollsters Patrick Caddell and Douglas Schoen, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggesting Obama should abandon his candidacy for re-election, stepping aside for “the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”


Conceding that even with an all-time-low job approval rating and even worse ratings on handling the economy, Obama could “eke out” a victory in November 2012, Caddell and Schoen argued that the type of campaign required for Obama’s “political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern – not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.”


The PUMA P.A.C. that emerged to oppose Obama and support Hillary in 2008 remains in existence. It describes itself as “a burgeoning group of bloggers, writers and citizens who are joining together to fight back against the corrupt leadership of the DNC, their ‘chosen’ candidate and the mainstream media that enables them.”


In 2008, Obama won over women voters, with 56 percent voting for him, versus 49 percent of men, according to Woman’s Vote Watch at Rutgers University.


The Obama campaign appears to have gained at least a temporary advantage among women, after charging that GOP presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, are “hostile to women” for their stand on contraceptives, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll released this week.


According to the poll, Obama’s biggest advantage rests with women under 50, with six in 10 supporting him. Romney’s support in that demographic dropped to 30 percent, giving Obama a 2-to-1 advantage.


Obama administration senior officials confirmed Monday that Clinton will not campaign for Obama to avoid making her position as secretary of state appear political, according to the Huffington Post.


Clinton previously announced she plans to leave the State Department at the end of Obama’s current term.


Written by by Jerome R. Corsi-World Net Daily




COMMENTS BY GARY GATEHOUSE


Out of sight out of mind ?


 Could have the Obama regime given or promised Hillary a top tier job if he was elected to the White House?  Secretary of State is a prestigious position, and Obama has succeeded in keeping Hillary out of the country since almost day one of his appointing her as Secretary of State.


So far we have more than enough uncovered information of Obama to warrant at least a Congressional investigation, but as of this writing the Republican leadership is silent.


We have those in the media who swear they are going to vett the president and expose him for what he really is, as of yet not word has been spoken on the airways via radio or television about Sheriff Joe Arpaio findings NOT ONE DAMN WORD.

So much for the vetting that was going to take place.  Just more smoke being blown up America’s ass.. 

LISTEN TO THE MOST POLITICALLY INCORRECT TALK SHOW ON THE WWW
CLICK ON THE PLAYER TO LISTEN TO CURRENT OR PAST SHOWS