Archive | January, 2013

Elected Officials Are Fundamentally Dishonest

31 Jan

Gun control has long been a focus of many in this country. Though I’m not knowledgeable of all the nuances of the Second Amendment, based on the Founding Fathers’ circumstances, it had far more to do with enabling the citizenry to protect themselves against tyrannical government than against local psychopaths. It is about providing a balanced firepower so when King George’s successor came knocking on your door, you could fight back. Government today is no less inclined to abuse its authority than it was then. Based on the absurd and ongoing power grab that is present day Washington, it’s as threatening as ever.

That so many of you view the NRA with its resistance to further restrictions on firearms as intransigent lunatics has far more to do with how you conduct yourselves in office than it does with the NRA’s actions.

You in public office are fundamentally dishonest people. You lead lives of deception at every turn, structuring your lives as comfortably as you can while governing with an indifference and arrogance that is absolutely maddening. When the country is reeling from financial disaster, you waste a trillion dollars on a health care bill we can’t afford and you’ve never read.

You claim it’s critical because health care costs are killing this country… no they’re not, you are! You are killing this country. You endorse the ongoing slaughter of millions of unborn children and whine when terrorists are water boarded. You can’t lecture us right in Newtown High School about not doing enough to keep our children safe, while simultaneously slaughtering the unborn. You fabricate the intense, media laden drama of the fiscal cliff and lack the courage to do anything about truly reforming the obscene gluttony of government. You know you’ll be out of office before the bill comes due… you don’t care and have no integrity nor honor.

You lie whenever and wherever you need to to move forth your agenda. Were you able, you would purge the US of guns… every last gun in the country, if you could. So please forgive Wayne LaPierre and those of us who don’t trust you as far as we can spit. You’re a dishonest lot, motivated by a distorted worldview. If mass murder prevention were truly your goal, you would welcome armed security wherever needed. It is outrageous that we protect our money with far more firepower than we protect our children.

I have never owned a gun, nor wanted to as intensely as right now. You’ll stop restricting guns when only you have them.

Brendan Duffy
Sandy Hook,Conn 

Supreme Court Opens Door to Obama Eligibility Challenge on February 15th

30 Jan
Supreme Court Opens Door to Obama Eligibility Challenge on February 15th

Chief Justice John Roberts Schedules A Case Regarding Obamas Forged IDs to be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court.

The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS.

Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

More from Huffington Post: Taitz’s case argues that Obama is using false identification, a fake last name, a false Social Security number and forged birth certificates, and Selective Service applications to run for president.

She originally filed the lawsuit against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (D) in her attempt to prevent California’s electoral votes from being counted and to prevent Vice President Joe Biden from counting the electoral votes earlier this month.

((more information)

Red Flag News

Supreme Court Docket  listing link



30 Jan

During the first debate, President Obama touted the support of AARP for ObamaCare several times, clearly tying them together.

Further proof that they were working in concert can be found in recently released emails between the White House and AARP operatives. As the emails show, AARP threw their tremendous power behind the legislation despite the fact they were getting calls overwhelmingly against it. In fact, on September 20, 2012, Kimberly A. Strassel of the Wall Street Journal wrote: “Thanks to just-released emails from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, we now know that AARP worked through 2009-2010 as an extension of a Democratic White House, toiling daily to pass a health bill that slashes $716 billion from Medicare, strips seniors of choice, and sets the stage for rationing.

We know that despite AARP’s awareness that its seniors overwhelmingly opposed the bill, the ‘nonpartisan organization’ chose to serve the president’s agenda.

The 71 pages of emails show an AARP management taking orders from the White House, scripting the president’s talking points, working to keep its board ‘in line’ and pledging a fealty to ‘the cause.‘ Seniors deserve to know all this, as AARP seeks to present itself as neutral in this presidential election.

” AARP refuses to take a formal position on the Independent Payment Advisory Board (“rationing board”) portion of ObamaCare and even defends some aspects of the board. Given the negative impact that the IPAB will have on seniors, this is unbelievable (but sadly, not unexpected).

AMAC is against the harsh provisions in ObamaCare that gives the Federal government complete control of our healthcare. It destroys the best healthcare system in the world, takes 716 billion dollars out of Medicare, and has the power to restrict and ration our medical treatment.

AMAC is fighting to keep our right to receive treatment from our doctors without the interference of Federal bureaucrats. Big government experiments like the “stimulus” and ObamaCare have only increased the uncertainty and instability, and are core reasons for the persistently high unemployment rate and why the household incomes of Mature Americans have declined so much. AMAC, The Association of Mature American Citizens, believes we can do much better.

As a steadily growing alternative to groups like AARP, and with an expanding influence in the nation’s capital, we aim to champion the interests of Mature Americans, seniors, and prospective retirees. We believe in religious freedom, free enterprise, and support common sense solutions to our Nation’s largest challenges.

Bottom line – Our livelihoods, our families’ future prosperity and our standards of living should not be threatened by bad policies emanating from Washington, DC.

((ABOVE WAS  Letter from Association of Mature American Citizens))


Patriots, this is just another example of how deeply ingrained the Socialist/Marxist movement is,the AARP comes on as wanting to help senior citizens,stand up for their rights,offer all kinds of come on’s to entice unknowing seniors into signing on as members of the AARP.

The AARP is just another propaganda arm of the Socialist/Marxist/Progressive/Communist Party more commonly known as the Democrat Party, the AARP over the course of many presidential elections has gone to bat for the Democrat Party, they are nothing more than lap dogs of a political party that will say anything,do anything to corrupt our country,even to the extent of lying to American seniors about health care etc.

We patriots must continue to stay vigilant ,we must stay focused, the Democrat Party and all it’s cohorts are many and at all levels of our society, the Democrat Party has established over the decades a huge network of commercial and political propaganda outlets that continue to develop new ways of hoodwinking the American people…

Like I have said many many times we who care we who educate ourselves know the threats that continue to hammer away at America society, we conservatives have NO representation in congress, the Republican party is nothing more than Democrats light!



30 Jan
Anchor babies, Illegal immigration, Corruption, Greed, Theft
Illegal Aliens Seizing Our Country with Liberal Democratic Help


Liberal SOCIALIST Democrats try with every ounce of energy they possess to convince all other God-loving citizens that the conservative forces of the United States are mean and vicious who do not want illegal aliens to have their innocent babies to be born on our soil and become automatic American citizens.

All these charitable sounding pleadings from the phoniest, most dishonest, clearly lying, do-anything-to-get-reelected corrupt politicians, have no more credibility than a cheap-watch, street corner hawker trying to steal your money.

What they really want is for those babies to be born and be registered as United States citizens so they can sponsor their mothers, their fathers, their sisters and brothers and any other relatives that qualify as family. And if you know the Latinos, you know they have BIG families.

But why? you ask; VOTES my friend, simply that: VOTES to perpetuate their futures in office. 

THIS IS WHY I HAVE ALWAYS SAID WE NEED TERM LIMITS. With term limits, and just ONE term, there is no REELECTION process. And with no reelection there is no need for graft, corruption, finding, stealing and cheating for money needed to get reelected. WIPE OUT RE-ELECTION AND YOU WIPE OUT CORRUPTION, GREED, AND THEFT and we are left with a clean government.

Just recently I got an email from Bishop E. W. Jackson, Sr., a minister, national radio commentator and graduate of Harvard Law School who states that “An alien invasion may come at the hands of misinterpreted clause in the 14th Amendment.”

Bishop Jackson is also “Executive Director of STAND (Staying True to America’s National Destiny) a Political Action Committee. In this capacity he is carrying out his responsibilities for keeping America informed of the dangers of illegal aliens to our country if left unchecked.

In his message he states, “Between 300,000 and 400,000 children, called ‘anchor babies,’ are born to illegal immigrants in the United States every year. This means as many as 1 out of 10 births is to an illegal immigrant mother!” He also says that these ‘anchor babies’ are falsely and erroneously granted ‘birthright citizenship’ through the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

Liberal Democrats don’t have much use or good words for the United States Constitution and most would scrap this most enduring document of freedom of any country in the world, in an instant in order to write their own rules of freedom as they interpret it. But when it comes to using the still active Constitution’s provisions to their advantage, such as the 14th Amendment, to gain possible votes for their permanent residency in political office, they are 100 percent behind it.

This matter of granting birthright citizenship to these illegal alien babies allows, as Bishop Jackson states, “citizens of another country to steal benefits, resources and jobs from the American people. It rewards those who have intentionally broken our laws, costs us billions of dollars each year in taxes, and damages other aspects of our society and culture.”

But as anyone should be able to clearly see, this sort of granting of citizenship to these illegal alien babies does not help to remedy the problem of illegal entry by foreigners, it becomes an INCENTIVE for additional illegals to break our laws and steal across our borders just for those ill-gotten benefits.

Now the corrupt and thieving liberal Democrats don’t consider these ILLEGAL ALIENS as such, calling them “undocumented immigrants.” Talk about making a silk purse out of a pig’s nose; that can’t be any more off base than the term “undocumented immigrants.”

Immigrants are people from foreign countries that have come to this country legally by application for residency and ultimate citizenship. The key word there is “legally”; these criminals are not here “legally” they are aliens, who by definition are “residents born in or belonging to another country who have not acquired citizenship by naturalization.”

So if these people did not come here through legal due process of filing an application and then arriving when notified their application was approved for entry; they are ILLEGAL ALIENS who are criminals by virtue of having broken our entrance laws. They should be escorted to the nearest border and removed from our country without hesitation.

If Obama’s administrative employees can not enforce our laws they should be removed and replaced in their assigned duties. If Obama does not insist that this action be taken then HE should be removed from the office he has usurped. Hopefully, that action will take place in 2012 or earlier if possible.



Currently Congressional actions are being planned to clarify the intent of the 14th Amendment as the current interpretation ‘birthright citizenship’ for illegal alien babies is a “misapplication” of the law, and they want to clarify its intent by amending Section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as reported by Bishop Jackson.

Jackson also reports that “Birthright citizenship has created an entire industry of ‘birth tourism.’ A U.S. Customs and Border Protection official says

“On the southern border, aliens drive around U.S. hospitals until their water breaks, and then they drive up to the emergency room door for admission and ‘free’ maternity care.” And, of course, automatic citizenship.

* In Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, 70% of the women who give birth are illegal aliens.

* A Korean woman spent thousands of dollars to have a company arrange her travel to the United States so she could give birth here. “If they could afford it, all my friends would go to the United States to have their babies,” she said.

* A Turkish woman did the same thing.
“We found a company on the Internet and decided to go to Austin for our child’s birth. They organized everything for me.

I don’t want [my child] to deal with visa issues—-American citizenship has so many advantages.”

WRITTEN BY:By Jerry McConnell

Comments by Gary Gatehouse

Patriots, I have done at least 6 shows about illegals in our country, the issue is being covered up ,or being used as a hammer to hit we Patriots who want our government to deport all these illegals, we are called racist,we are being told by the left and their minions in congress that we as conservatives just don’t care.

You know what, they are right I don’t care, I care about my family,my country and my fellow LEGAL AMERICANS ! I could give a rat’s ass about illegals.

They came into my country illegally, they are like leaches, living off hard working LEGAL AMERICANS who pay their taxes and abide by the constitution.

If we were to cross the border into Mexico without the proper papers etc we would be arrested for being there ILLEGALLY.

Wake up America we are being taken for a ride by the Federal Government,both sides, Republican and Democrat are selling us out

This is one political Pearl Harbor that we are not going to let happen.
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.


30 Jan



Liberals running the show do not and cannot tell you who they really are. In the 2004 elections, their game plan was to run the newbies to the right of their opponents knowing Republicans were angry with incumbents because of their runaway spending and their deviation from conservatism. It was a brilliant plan and put the Democrat Party in power.

These Democrats who won have become known as Blue Dog Democrats, and the majority of them have repeatedly voted overwhelmingly for the majority of everything Nancy Pelosi has pushed. They’re not conservatives or moderates but sheep following their leader at the expense of the promises they made to their constituents to get elected.So, exactly why couldn’t they tell the populace who they are and what are their true goals and agendas?

They couldn’t because they would never have been elected and their party would never be in power.Upon examination of the Congressional Progressive Caucus‘ Website, they have made “Fairness for All” their Progressive Promise. Let’s examine just exactly what “Fairness for All” really means. For purposes of nomenclature, their promises shall be called Liberal Speak. Due to space limitations, not all are listed here.

Liberal Speak #1. Uphold the right to universal access to affordable, high-quality health care for all.

Invest in America and create new jobs in the US by building more affordable housing, rebuilding schools and physical infrastructure

To eliminate all forms of discrimination based upon color, race, religion,gender, creed, disability or sexual orientation.

To reaffirm freedom of association and enforce the right to organize.

What They Actually Mean:
We must fight for humane public policies that will provide quality health care, education, and job training and that redirect public investment from the military to much-neglected urban housing and infrastructure. Such policies require the support of a majoritarian coalition of trade unionists, people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians and all other peoples committed to democratic change.

Our greatest contribution as American socialists to global social justice is to build that coalition, which is key to transforming the power relations of global capitalism.We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination…Simply put, the domination of the economy by privately-owned corporation is not the most rational and equitable way to govern our economic life.

Liberal Speak #2.- To preserve guaranteed Social Security benefits for all Americans,protect private pensions and require corporate accountability.- To export more American products and not more American jobs anddemand fair trade.- To ensure working families can live above the poverty line and with dignity by raising and indexing the minimum wage.- Not listed in their promises but listed in their proposed legislation is a 50% reduction on student loan interest

What They Actually Mean

Massive redistribution of income from corporations and the wealthy to wage earners and the poor and the public sector, in order to provide the main source of new funds for social programs, income maintenance and infrastructure rehabilitation.Equally important is the assertion of democratic control over private resources such as insurance and credit, making them available for socially responsible investment as well as over land, raw materials, and manufacturing infrastructure. Such democratic control must also encompass existing financial institutions, whose funds can be used to invest in places abandoned or bypassed by transnational capital, such as urban and rural areas, and in sectors of population that have been historically denied control and ownership of significant economic resources.

Quotes by A MARXIST-Hillary Clinton:

“Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush’s] tax cuts may have helped you. We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.

We’re going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.

“”We just can’t trust the American people to make those types of choices…Government has to make those choices for people.

“”We can’t afford to have that money go to the private sector. The money has to go to the federal government because the federal government will spend that money better than the private sector will spend it.”

“The other day the oil companies recorded the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits. And I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy, alternatives and technologies that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence.

Liberal Speak #3

To protect the personal privacy of all Americans from unbridled policepowers and unchecked Government intrusion.
To bring U.S. troops home from Iraq.
To rebuild U.S. Alliances around the world, restore international respect for American power and influence, and reaffirm our nation’sconstructive engagement in the United Nations and other multilateralorganizations.
To enhance international cooperation to reduce the threats posed bynuclear proliferation and weapons of mass destruction.

What They Actually Mean

The links among heavy military spending, fiscal imbalance and a weakening economy are too clear to ignore. Domestically, the United States faces social and structural economic problems of a magnitude unknown to other advanced capitalist states. The resources needed to sustain U.S. dominance are a drain on the national economy, particularly the most neglected and underdeveloped sectors. Nowhere is a struggle against militarism more pressing than in the United States, where the military budget bleeds the public sector of much needed funds for social programs.

The United States is engaged in a long-term policy of imperial overreach in a period in which global instability will probably increase.No country, even a superpower like the United States, can guarantee peace and stability, never mind justice. Only a genuinely multinational armed force can intervene in violent conflicts to enforce generally accepted standards of human rights and democratic practices. [presumably they mean the UN]Such peacekeeping is one important function that must be strengthened within a new global governance.

Enforcement of international standards. New international regulatory bodies must ensure that the interests of all the world’s people are protected with the power to tax transnational corporations…At the same time, the military Keynesianism that has dominated federal expenditures, constricting the capacity of governments at all levels to response adequately to social needs, must end.

PAST Liberal Quotes:

SEN. KERRY: “It depends on what the situation is you find on the ground on January 20th of 2005. I will tell you this, Tim. I will immediately reach out to other nations in a very different way from this administration. Within weeks of being inaugurated, I will return to the U.N. and I will literally, formally rejoin the community of nations and turn over a proud new chapter in America’s relationship with the world…

“MR. RUSSERT: Is the U.N. more capable of running Iraq than we are? SEN. KERRY: “Sure, they are. Of course, they are.

THEN-Senator Barrack Obama: “We are now in the midst of a war that never should have been authorized, never should have been waged,” Obama told a crowd of close to 3,000 packed into the gymnasium at the University of New Hampshire. “Unless we bring that war to a close, we cannot deal with those other problems I just mentioned,” such as education and healthcare, Obama added, his words nearly drowned out by the wild applause that followed his denouncement of the war.

Liberal Speak #4

To fight corporate consolidation of the media and ensure opportunity for all voices to be heard. [Fairness Doctrine]What They Actually Mean:Radical right-wing would-be prophets are correct: The success of global capitalism demands that traditional democratic standards of justice, equality and decency be undermined.In the United States, the rise of global capitalism has been accompanied by the increasing strength of conservative and corporate elites and the weakening of social movements and trade unions that have historically been the backbone of mass liberalism.

The current assault on the welfare state led by corporate and conservative elites is also an attack on political democracy. Democratic socialists must reinvest democracy with its political and economic content to give full voice to popular democratic aspirations. [Silence conservative talk radio]Senator Bernie Sanders stated:”

Now is the time to begin asking that if networks provide their listeners with 99 percent of talk shows being with right-wing extremists, whether that really is what public trust is about. Now is the time to open the question of the Fairness Doctrine again.”

Representative Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) stated:”A diverse American media that presents a wide array of ideas from all sides of the political spectrum is essential to the maintenance of our democracy. If the media becomes corrupted then we’ve begun the erosion of the American political system and the American democracy.”

While accusing conservative hosts of posing a threat to National Security, Congressman Hinchey said “All of that stuff would end,” in relation to the Fairness Doctrine.********************

All of the “What They Actually Means” have been taken directly from the Democratic Socialists of America website.

You will notice they both have the same agenda except for one thing.


So, to be succinct :Liberal Speak 1 and 2 = Redistribution of Wealth meaning more and more taxes.Liberal
Speak 3-Cut defense spending in favor of social programs.
Cut Government programs related to National Security to redirect funds to social programs.

Liberal Speak 4- Shut down conservative voice in America so that everyone hears only socialism Liberals-Socialist-Marxist-Communist-Progressives what ever the hell they want to be called in reality these people are the Enemy Within.

If they aren’t going to tell the public who they really are and what their agenda for America is, then we need to inform the public ourselves. These people need to be stopped.



29 Jan

                  THE MAN CLOAKED IN SECRECY           

Many people ask why put so much emphasis on the need to obtain Barack Obama’s birth certificate over the concerns many Americans have regarding his shocking willfulness in withholding virtually any meaningful documents about his early life.

First of all, IT WAS WORLD NET DAILY  at the direction of Joseph Farah founder, editor and CEO of WND that first chronicled, going back nearly two years, in a piece called, “Where have all the records gone,” the almost unfathomable laundry list of personal papers Obama has deliberately and consistently shrouded in unprecedented secrecy.

Before reviewing what’s contained under lock and key in that mysterious vault, let’s be remind of the fact Obama ran for the presidency pledging the most open and transparent administration in American history. What he delivered is the most closed and secretive White House in memory.

But it must be pointed out something exceptional about the long-form birth certificate: There is a constitutional imperative to establish yourself as a “natural born citizen” to hold the office of the presidency. And since the birth certificate is the primary document that establishes who your parents are and where you were born, it is the essential building block of establishing constitutional eligibility.

In America, if you run for the local school board, you are expected to meet eligibility requirements. If you run for dog catcher, you are expected to meet eligibility requirements. If you run for the U.S. Senate, you are required to meet eligibility requirements. And the very highest standard of all should be held for the highest office in the land. We do not simply accept the word of politicians desiring to hold office. We demand proof – just as we do for those seeking to participate in Little League sports.

Worse yet, on the basis of the story Obama tells Americans about his background, he is probably not constitutionally eligible to hold office, since the man he claims as his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., was a foreign student, and the woman he claims as mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was apparently too young even to confer ordinary citizenship on her offspring at the time of his birth, whether he was born in the U.S. or not.

But those are arguments that can only be made with actual established facts – not conjecture, not autobiographies, not hearsay, not unreliable birth documents, not newspaper notices


the long list of personal papers secreted away by Obama – the man who famously told us: “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are the people with something to hide.”

    * educational records from kindergarten at Noelani Elementary through the swanky private Punahou School;

    * his SAT scores;

    * records from Occidental College that would reveal whether he attended as a foreign student;

    * records from Columbia University that would reveal what kind of a student he was that merited admission later at Harvard Law School;

    * his thesis written at Columbia on “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament,” on which he reportedly spent a year of research;

    * records from Harvard Law School, including his LSAT scores;

    * Harvard Law Review articles during the time he served as the first black president of the institution;

    * University of Chicago scholarly articles;

    * passport and travel records;

    * medical and health records;

    * files and schedules during his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 through 2004;

    * his client list during his time in private practice at the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard;

    * Illinois State Bar Association records;

    * baptism records;

    * marriage licenses for his mother to either Barack Obama Sr. or Lolo Soetoro;

    * adoption records of his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.

The Question must be asked –Is there a pattern here?

Should we take Obama at his word when he says, “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are the people with something to hide”?

written by: Joseph Farah founder, editor and CEO of WND

Gary Gatehouse comments
Should we take Obama at his word the answer is HELL NO, why?  Because he is a liar,he has lied to the American people on numerous occasions, and continues to lie about his Health Care, jobs, you name it.  Obama needs to be impeached, but alas there is no one in congress with enough backbone to start the process. Republicans are spineless always have been always will be when it comes to standing up to the Socialist Left.

There is a movement in the United States,the people involved are called BIRTHERS, why because they do not believe Obama is eligible for the office of president based on the Constitution,which states a person has to be a natural born citizen of the United States, and Obama has yet to prove he is.

The BIRTHER movement needs more people, needs to start pushing really hard on this issue, either Obama produces a legitimate Birth Certificate or he gets the HELL OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE - Custom comment codes for MySpace, Hi5, Friendster and more


29 Jan

The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants in the United States
93 sex offenders and 12 serial sexual offenders coming across U.S. borders illegally per day

After conducting a 12 month in-depth study of illegal immigrants who committed sex crimes and murders for the time period of January 1999 through April 2006 , it is clear that the U.S. public faces a dangerous threat from sex predators who cross the U.S. borders illegally.

There were 1500 cases analyzed in depth. They included: serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides, and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants. Police reports, public records, interviews with police, and media accounts were all included. Offenders were located in 36 states, but it is clear, that the most of the offenders were located in states with the highest numbers of illegal immigrants. California was number one, followed by Texas, Arizona, New Jersey, New York, and Florida.

Based on population numbers of 12,000,000 illegal immigrants and the fact that young males make up more of this population than the general U.S. population, sex offenders in the illegal immigrant group make up a higher percentage. When examining ICE reports and public records, it is consistent to find sex offenders comprising 2% of illegals apprehended. Based on this 2% figure, which is conservative, there are approximately 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States.

This translates to 93 sex offenders and 12 serial sexual offenders coming across U.S. borders illegally per day. The 1500 offenders in this study had a total of 5,999 victims. Each sex offender averaged 4 victims. This places the estimate for victimization numbers around 960,000 for the 88 months examined in this study.


Of the 1500 cases reviewed, 525 (35%) were child molestations, 358 (24%) were rapes, and 617 (41%) were sexual homicides and serial murders. Of the child molestations, 47% of the victims were Hispanic, 36% were Caucasian, 8% were Asian, 6% were African American, and 3% were other nationalities. In most instances, the offenders were familiar with their victims. In fact, 82% of the victims were known to their attackers. The other 18% were molested by strangers. In those instances, the illegal immigrants typically gained access to the victims after having worked as a day laborer at or near the victims’ homes. Victims ranged in age from 1 year old to 13 years old, with the average age being 6.

In rape cases, the offenders were less likely to know their victims. Only 64% of the victims knew their attackers. Furthermore, rape victims proved to be more diverse than child molestation victims. Hispanic and Caucasian victims were identical at 35% each.

The next most likely victims were African American women, and other nationalities comprised the remainder. These women suffered brutal attacks. Commonly, a weapon was used to control the victims. These weapons were most often sharp instruments. And the victims were beaten during the rapes over 70% of the time. Offenders engaged in sodomy in 67% of the attacks, and gang rape took place in .007% of the cases. Rape victims ranged in age from 16-79 and averaged age 23.

Serial rapists accounted for 3% of all illegal immigrant rapists. Each serial rapist averaged 5 victims, with the number of victims ranging from 2 to 11. Two serial rapists were confirmed HIV positive, and another offender had a venereal disease.

The murders were the worst of the sex crimes and were especially vicious. The most common method was for an offender to break into a residence and ambush his victims. Not only were victims raped, but some (6%) were mutilated. The crime scenes were very bloody, expressing intense, angry perpetrator personalities. Specifically, most victims were blitzed, rendered incapable of fighting back, and then raped and murdered. The most common method of killing was bludgeoning, followed by stabbing. Caucasians were more likely to become victims of sexual homicide committed by illegal immigrants. Hispanics were second, and African Americans were third. Victims of sexual homicides averaged age 42. However, victims ranged in age from 16-81.

Serial killers accounted for .005% of the sex crimes. The serial killers averaged 9 victims per offender. Victim choice centered on victims the offenders did not know. Each serial killer targeted men and women, but females were higher, making up 73%. Illegal immigrant serial killers were more likely to strike in the West and the Southern United States.

Victim socioeconomic status changed for each type of crime. Those who fell victim to child molestation tended to be from a lower socioeconomic status than those who were raped and those who were raped and murdered. In fact, 57% of those rape/murdered were from the upper middle class.

There was an especially disturbing finding that in 22% of all sex crimes committed by illegal immigrants, victims with physical and mental disabilities were targeted. These disabled victims were each under age 18. In those cases, the perpetrators knew their victims.


The average age of illegal immigrants who were sex offenders was 27, but they ranged in age from 16-69. Child molesters tended to be older, averaging age 32. The average age of rapists was 26, and murderers averaged age 28. There is a trend that these offenders are becoming younger. For example, in 2006, the average age of sex offender illegal immigrants was 20. The highest number came from Mexico. El Salvador was the original home to the next highest number of sexual offenders. Other countries of origin included: Brazil, China, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico*, Russia, and Vietnam.

They averaged 4 victims per offender. Nearly 63% had been deported on another offense prior to the sex crime. There was an average of 3 years of committing crimes such as DUI, assaults, or drug related offenses prior to being apprehended for a sexual offense.

Alcohol and drug use seemingly played a large role in these crimes. In fact, 81% of offenders were drinking or using drugs prior to offending. Rapists and killers were more likely to use alcohol and drugs consistently than child molesters.

Offenders had the use of a vehicle in 78% of the cases. However, the vehicles were only owned by those offenders 54% of the time. In the other instances, the offenders either borrowed or stole the vehicle.

Many offenders were unkempt in appearance and worked with their hands. They were transient in that they went where work took them. Therefore, only 25% were stable within a community. Further, in 31% of the crimes, the offenders entered into the communities where they offended within 2 months of the commission of their sex offenses. However, many, 79%, had been in the U.S. for more than one year before being arrested for a sex crime, and they were typically known to the Criminal Justice system for prior, less serious offenses before they molested, raped, or murdered.

There was a trend to be single while offending, as only 23% were married at the time of their crimes. Most were known to date quite a bit and have derogatory views of females. Domestic violence was common as well, as nearly half of those with spouses or significant others had a history of domestic abuse.

Nearly 35% were considered religious and even more, 59% had been raised in a religious home. Their work consisted of manual labor in industries such as agriculture, construction, restaurant, and tourism. Residences were rented and usually shared with several other illegal immigrants. Many were partially bi-lingual with a preference for their native languages.

Education levels were typically low. Only 22% had graduated high school. As such, there was a pattern of irresponsible, impulsive behavior in offender backgrounds. Solutions to their problems entailed moving, i.e. running away. Most simply ran to the southern U.S. border after being connected with their sex offenses.


Illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes first cross the U.S. border illegally. Then they gradually commit worse crimes and are continually released back into society or deported. Those who were deported simply returned illegally again. Only 2% of the offenders in this study has no history of criminal behavior, beyond crossing the border illegally. There is a clear pattern of criminal escalation. From misdemeanors such as assault or DUI, to drug offenses, illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes break U.S. laws repeatedly. They are highly mobile, work in low skilled jobs with their hands, use drugs and alcohol, are generally promiscuous, have little family stability, and choose victims who are easy to attack. Their attacks are particularly brutal, and they use a hands-on method of controlling and/or killing their victims.

Note: Nearly 30% of the victims were illegal immigrants themselves.The remainder were U.S. citizens.

STUDY DONE:By Deborah Schurman-Kauflin, Ph.D. Violent Crimes Institute, LLC Atlanta, Georgia
*****Please note: This study of illegal immigrants who committed sex crimes in the U.S. was NOT funded by anyone or any group. As a working profiler, I wondered what the statistics were regarding these crimes. I could not find any studies that discussed these offenses and the profile of the offenders, so I did the research myself. Additionally, I was not paid for publishing the results.