Archive | March, 2013

The Roman Catholic church and United States Catholic politicians

24 Mar
 THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND CATHOLIC POLITICIANS

My question to the leadership and yes to the Pope the world leader of the Roman Catholic church is this,why are these politicians who do not believe in PRO LIFE, who support ROE V WADE, who support abortion, who support taking of human life, why are they NOT excommunicated from the Catholic Church? 

They go against the teachings of the church, they and many who call themselves cathoics who attend church every sunday support ABORTION,why has the church tolerated this? 

Where are the United States catholic cardnials who represent the church leadership here in America? 

Has the Catholic Church turned it’s back on it’s own teachings on abortion, will it not enforce it’s own religious laws? 

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHINGS ON ABORTION

Abortion and Excommunication

The Roman Catholic Church from the beginning has consistently upheld the sanctity of the life of the unborn child and condemned the act of direct abortion. To oppose this teaching contradicts the revelation of Sacred Scripture and Christian tradition.

The Catholic Church has consistently condemned abortion — the direct and purposeful taking of the life of the unborn child. In principle, Catholic Christians believe that all life is sacred from conception until natural death, and the taking of innocent human life, whether born or unborn, is morally wrong. The Church teaches, “Human life is sacred because from its beginning it involves the creative action of God and it remains for ever in a special relationship with the Creator, who is its sole end. God alone is the Lord of life from its beginning until its end: no one can under any circumstance claim for himself the right directly to destroy an innocent human being”

Obtaining an Abortion

Any Catholic who deliberately and knowingly obtains a procured abortion commits a mortal sin and is also automatically excommunicated, under canon 1398.

Under the laws of secular society, if one person commits a crime, then anyone who deliberately and knowingly provides essential or substantial means for that person to commit that crime is called an accessory to that crime and is also subject to the penalties of law. Similarly, any Catholic who deliberately and knowingly provides essential or substantial means for any woman to procure an abortion also commits a mortal sin and also incurs the same sentence of excommunication.

Any Catholic who substantially assists another in the deliberate sin of abortion is also guilty of serious sin and also incurs a latae sententiae excommunication.

Believing in Abortion

Any Catholic who obstinately denies that abortion is always gravely immoral commits the sin of heresy. The sin of heresy also incurs a latae sententiae excommunication.

Unfortunately, some Catholics obstinately deny that abortion is always immoral, and some Catholics claim that abortion can, at times, be a morally-acceptable choice, and some Catholics claim that a person can, in good conscience, choose abortion. Under the Code of Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church, canons 751 and 1364, all such Catholics are automatically excommunicated for the sin of heresy.

This sentence of latae sententiae excommunication applies to any Catholic who denies that abortion is gravely immoral, regardless of whether they keep this denial hidden or publicly reveal it.

Promoting Abortion

Those Catholics who publicly announce their denial that abortion is always gravely immoral, or who publicly promote abortion, or who publicly argue in favor of legalized abortion, also commit a mortal sin and also incur a sentence of automatic excommunication.

This sentence of excommunication applies to Catholics who are politicians, as well as to those Catholics who are political commentators, or public speakers, or who write or otherwise publicly communicate their erroneous view that abortion can be morally-acceptable or that abortion should be legal. This sentence of excommunication also certainly applies to those Catholics who claim to be theologians or Biblical scholars, but who believe or teach that abortion is not always gravely immoral.

Those Catholics who promote abortion are automatically excommunicated for two reasons. First, they have fallen into the sin of heresy by believing that abortion is not always gravely immoral (canons 751 and 1364). Second, these Catholics are providing substantial assistance for women to obtain abortions by influencing public policy to make abortions legal, and to keep abortions legal, and to broaden access to abortion. Those who provide such substantial assistance commit a mortal sin and incur a sentence of automatic excommunication (canon 1398).

Voting for Abortion

Any Catholic politician who casts a vote with the intention of legalizing abortion, or of protecting laws allowing abortion, or of widening access to abortion, commits a mortal sin.

When such a vote indicates that the Catholic politician believes that abortion is not always gravely immoral, such a politician incurs a sentence of automatic excommunication, under canons 751 and 1364, because of heresy.

When such a vote is intended to have the effect of making abortion legal, or more easily obtainable, or more widely available, such a politician incurs a sentence of automatic excommunication, under canon 1398, as someone who is attempting to provide substantial or essential means for women to obtain abortions. Catholic politicians who pass laws which legalize, protect, or widen access to abortion, are providing essential assistance to women who want to obtain abortions.

It is not sufficient for Catholic politicians to claim that they are “personally opposed” to abortion. If any Catholic politician favors legalized abortion, despite a claim of personal opposition, such a politician commits a mortal sin by promoting abortion and by voting in favor of abortion.

The same is true for any Catholic who casts any vote with the intention of legalizing abortion, or of protecting laws allowing abortion, or of widening access to abortion. Such a voter commits a mortal sin and incurs a sentence of automatic excommunication for two reasons. First, they are committing the sin of heresy by believing that abortion should be legal and available. Second, they are committing the grievous sin of providing women with substantial or essential assistance in obtaining abortions, by attempting to legalize or broaden access to abortion.

However, if, for a period of time, Catholic politicians and voters are unable to enact a law prohibiting all abortion, then Catholic politicians and voters may in good conscience vote for whichever law offers the greatest restrictions and limits on abortion. Subsequently, Catholic politicians and voters are required by the moral law to continue to enact further restrictions and limits on abortion, to the greatest extent possible, and, at every possible opportunity, to vote for laws which completely outlaw abortion.

Voting for Politicians

In general, the moral law requires Catholic voters to vote for those candidates who oppose abortion over those who favor abortion. However, there are exceptions to this general principle. For example, if a political candidate favors abortion, but is a member of a party which generally opposes abortion, a Catholic voter may, in good conscience, vote for that candidate, with the intention of giving more political power to the party which opposes abortion.

In another case, a Catholic voter might, in good conscience, vote for a pro-abortion candidate, if the political office would offer no opportunity for the elected candidate to vote for or against abortion. Even so, every Catholic voter should consider that anyone who supports abortion, as if it were a woman’s right, or as if it could ever be a moral choice, must necessarily be someone who has a seriously limited understanding of morality and justice. Such a person would not often be the better candidate for any office in place of one who understands that abortion is gravely immoral.

In every case, a Catholic should vote in such a way as to obtain as many restrictions on abortion as possible, and so as to obtain the end to legalized abortion as soon as possible.

Constitutional Amendment

Within any constitutional form of government, it would be ideal to have a constitutional clause or amendment which permanently and completely outlaws all procured abortions. Such an amendment must ban all abortions, regardless of circumstance, so that the direct and voluntary killing of an innocent prenatal human being will be always contrary to human law, just as it is always contrary to the moral law.

A constitutional amendment can permit certain medical procedures, which are absolutely necessary to save the life of the mother, and which indirectly result in the unintended and unsought death of the prenatal, only if there is no possible way to save the life of the prenatal. A prenatal is defined as any human being from conception to birth. Every reasonable effort should be made to save the lives of both mother and prenatal. If the life of the prenatal can be saved by no other possible option than by risking or allowing the death of the mother, then the prenatal must be saved.

Catholic teaching clearly allows for certain medical procedures, which indirectly and involuntarily result in the death of the prenatal, to save the life of the mother, but only when all options to save the life of the prenatal have been exhausted. Such a procedure is not an abortion and is not an exception wherein abortion is allowed.

On the other hand, a constitutional amendment which bans abortion with exceptions for various cases, such as rape, incest, or a risk to the mother’s life, would be worse than having no such amendment at all.

Any woman who is willing to commit the sin of abortion, would also be willing to lie. If a constitutional amendment permitted abortion in cases of rape, then any woman willing to lie and to falsely claim that she was raped, would be able to also claim that she had a constitutional right to an abortion. The result would be that a constitutional amendment, which seems to ban abortion with some exceptions, would end up giving every woman who is willing to tell a lie, a purported constitutional right to abortion. This situation would be worse than having no such constitutional amendment at all.

Therefore, the only acceptable pro-life constitutional amendment would be one that, in accordance with Catholic teaching, bans all procured abortions without exception.

Snapshot of the spectrum of pro-life votes and views of Catholics on Capitol Hill, newly updated for the 112th Congress.

The percentage next to them is their pro-life rating since 1997, as compiled by National Right to Life

They are listed from the highest pro-life rating to the lowest.

SENATE

100%—Mike Johanns, R-Neb.

100%—Jim Risch, R-Idaho

100%—David Vitter, R-La.

  94%—Pat Toomey, R-Pa.**

  68%—Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska

  50%—Robert Casey Jr., D-Pa.

  31%—Mary Landrieu, D-La.

  23%—Susan Collins, R-Maine

  11%—Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.


  4%—John Kerry, D-Mass.

  2%—Richard Durbin, D-Ill.

  2%—Tom Harkin, D-Iowa

  2%—Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.

  2%—Patty Murray, D-Wash.

  2%—Jack Reed, D-R.I.

  1%—Robert Menendez, D-N.J.

  0%—Mark Begich, D-Alaska

  0%—Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.

  0%—Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.

  0%—Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
House of Representatives

100%—Steve Austria, R-Ohio

100%—John Boehner, R-Ohio

100%—Kevin Brady, R-Texas

100%—David Camp, R-Mich.

100%—Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.

100%—Mike Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.**

100%—Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb.

100%—Virginia Foxx, R-N.C.

100%—Phil Gingrey, R-Ga.

100%—Peter King, R-N.Y.

100%—Steve King, R-Iowa

100%—Bob Latta, R-Ohio

100%—Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo.

100%—Daniel Lungren, R-Calif.

100%—Michael McCaul, R-Texas

100%—Thaddeus McCotter, R-Mich.

100%—Patrick McHenry, R-N.C.

100%—Devin Nunes, R-Calif.

100%—Tom Rooney, R- Fla.

100%—Edward Royce, R-Calif.

100%—Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

100%—Steve Scalise, R-La.

100%—Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio

100%—Christopher Smith, R-N.J.

100%—John Sullivan, R-Okla.

100%—Patrick Tiberi, R-Ohio

99%—Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla.

98%—Steve Chabot, R-Ohio**

98%—Walter Jones, R-N.C.

97%—Tim Murphy, R-Pa.

95%—Frank LoBiondo, R-N.J.

91%—Jerry Costello, D-Ill.

88%—Tim Holden, D-Pa.

85%—Dale Kildee, D-Mich.

83%—Daniel Lipinski, D-Ill.

79%—Connie Mack IV, R-Fla.

77%—Joe Donnelly, D-Ind.

77%—Michael Doyle, D-Pa.

67%—Leonard Lance, R-N.J.

62%—Brian Bilbray, R-Calif.

61%—James Langevin, D-R.I.

57%—Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio

53%—Tim Ryan, D-Ohio

47%—Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio

44%—Stephen Lynch, D-Mass.

43%—Henry Cuellar, D-Texas

38%—Jason Altmire, D-Pa.

34%—Michael Michaud, D-Maine

32%—Richard Neal, D-Mass.

28%—Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas

27%—Bill Pascrell, D-N.J.

24%—Joseph Crowley, D-N.Y.

21%—John Dingell, D-Mich.

18%—Peter Visclosky, D-Ind.

15%—Dennis Cardoza, D-Calif.

14%—Ruben Hinojosa, D-Texas

13%—Jim Costa, D-Calif.

  8%—Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y.

  7%—Joe Baca, D-Calif.

  7%—James Moran, D-Va.

  4%—Brian Higgins, D-N.Y.

  3%—Robert Brady, D-Pa.

  3%—Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.

  2%—Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.

  2%—Jose Serrano, D-N.Y.

  1%—Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn.

  1%—Anna Eshoo, D-Calif.

  1%—Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y.

  1%—Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill.

  1%—Ed Markey, D-Mass.

  1%—James McGovern, D-Mass.

  1%—Frank Pallone, D-N.J.

  1%—Ed Pastor, D-Ariz.

 1%—Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

  1%—Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif.

  1%—Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif.

  1%—Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y.

  0%—Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.

  0%—Timothy Bishop, D-N.Y.

  0%—Michael Capuano, D-Mass.

  0%—Gerald Connolly, D-Va.

  0%—Joe Courtney, D-Conn.

  0%—Charlie Gonzalez, D-Texas

  0%—Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz.

  0%—John Larson, D-Conn.

  0%—Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M.

  0%—Betty McCollum, D-Minn.

  0%—Jerry McNerney, D-Calif.

  0%—George Miller, D-Calif.

  0%—Patrick Murphy, D-Pa.

  0%—Grace Napolitano, D-Calif.

  0%—Linda Sanchez, D-Calif.

  0%—Albio Sires, D-N.J.

  0%—Mike Thompson, D-Calif.

  0%—Paul Tonko, D-N.Y.

  0%—Peter Welch, D-Vt.

TAKE NOTICE OF HOW MANY SO CALLED CATHOLIC HISPANCS LEADERS IN CONGRESS WHO SUPPORT ABORTION AND  WHO REPRESENT MOSTLY HISPANIC AND MOSTLY CATHOLIC CONSTITUENTS

THE UNITED NATIONS IS COMING AFTER AMERICAN CITIZENS GUNS

22 Mar

PATRIOTS, ALL FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS ALL WHO BELIEVE IN AND TRUST THE CONSTITUTION OF UNITED STATES ,WE ARE UNDER ATTACK FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CROOKS OF THE UNITED NATIONS.

ALL THOSE TIN HORNED DICTATORS,ALL THOSE THAT HATE AMERICA, HATE EVERYTHING WE STAND, FOR ALL THOSE IN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDER THE BOOT OF A MARXIST REGIME THAT HATES THE 2ND AMENMENT WE PATRIOTS ARE NOW ON ALERT

IF WE FAIL TO STAND UP TO THIS,WELL HELL IT IS ALL ON US NOBODY ELSE, IT WILL BE OUR FAULT, WE MUST SPEAK UP LOUD,WE MUST NOT SHY AWAY FROM SAVING OUR COUNTRY, WE MUST TAKE UP THE BANNER OF FREEDOM, WE MUST DO THIS!

  photo ONTHEAIRFLASHINGSIGN.gif  photo march2013noamnestyBANNER_zps95a83c11.jpg Republican Party is thought to be the institutional vehicle for the advancement of conservative policies, but for decades, the conservative movement has been frustrated with the party’s deviation from conservative principles. It is no longer the party of Ronald Reaga, we do not have the drive the fire burning in our conservative bellies as we once had.  Who will light that fire once again?  THAT IS THE QUESTION
  photo galnetworkpunchoutbanner.gif

AMERICA CONGRESS IS LYING TO YOU OR DO YOU REALLY CARE

22 Mar

Lies that the illegal alien lobby perpetuates:

Lie #1: Illegal aliens take jobs Americans won’t do.

Truth: Americans are willing to do most jobs at a fair wage, but they won’t do those jobs at “slave wages” or minimum wage. Thus, American workers are constantly replaced by illegal aliens willing to work for half or a third of what American workers once received. These jobs that once afforded a middle class life style now only offer illegal alien workers poverty level wages, resulting in the shrinkage of the “American Middle Class” and the enormous growth of an ever-increasing “underclass” dependent on government entitlements.

Lie #2: Illegal aliens contribute more to the economy and tax base than they take.

Truth: A large portion of illegal aliens work for cash “under the table” paying no taxes. The great majority of illegals make $6-$8 per hour, ($12,480 – $16,640 per year). At such income levels, not only is there no tax due, but they also qualify for the “earned income tax credit”. In California, public education alone costs over $7,500 per pupil. Multiply that times 2-4 children, add the costs of free school breakfast and lunch, free medical care, food stamps, housing subsidies, and other entitlement “give-aways”. Harvard Professor George Borjas estimates illegal immigration costs the U.S. 70 billion dollars per year and Californians $1,300 per household annually in additional taxes. The Center for Immigration Studies estimate that the average Mexican illegal alien will use $55,200 more in public services during his lifetime than he pays in taxes.

Lie #3: Without illegal alien farm labor, a head of lettuce would cost $3.00.
Truth: It already costs $3.00. You just make a $1.00 down payment at the grocery store. The government finances the other two dollars until tax time, when the additional $2.00 balance is extracted from your wallet in the form of higher taxes. The Agriculture industry gets cheap labor and higher profits, while shifting all the social costs of illegal immigrant labor to the American tax payer.

Lie #4: Most illegal aliens come here only to seek work and are law-abiding “citizens”.

Truth: In Los Angeles, as of January, 2004, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens. A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal; police officers say the proportion is actually much greater. 

The bloody gang collaborates with the Mexican Mafia, the dominant force in California prisons, on complex drug-distribution schemes, extortion, and drive-by assassinations, and commits an assault or robbery every day in L.A. County. The gang has grown dramatically over the last two decades by recruiting recently arrived youngsters, most of them illegal, from Central America and Mexico. (Source: The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave, by Heather MacDonald, City Journal, Winter 2004)

Mortgage loans for illegal aliens
In search of profit at any cost, banks, credit unions and other American financial institutions are not only opening accounts and issuing credit cards for people they know to be in the U.S. illegally, but they are also making mortgage loans to those illegal aliens.

The federal government is doing nothing to stop this criminal enterprise.

Under the federal Immigration and Naturalization Act (8 USC, 1324), it is a federal felony to encourage an illegal alien to remain in the United States. Also, as Dianne Grassi reports in “Mortgages for Illegal Aliens Encouraged by FDIC” under U.S. Criminal Code 274, ‘It is a crime punishable by 10 years in jail for aiding and abetting someone in this country illegally for commercial gain.’ … the Bank Secrecy Act of 1972 provides that ‘Banks must know their customers and any illegal activity must be reported to the government.’”

Any reasonable person must see that by making a mortgage loan to an illegal alien, the lender is not only clearly encouraging that criminal to remain here, but is itself in violation of federal law.

In  War on Terror, banks are opening accounts and issuing credit cards to people from all over the world who are allowed to overstay visa’s or simply walk into America. Ask yourself why accepting wages from illegal labor as deposits and then helping to electronically wiring a portion of that money out of the U.S. is not money laundering.
PATRIOTS,ask yourself how many of the 9/11 terrorists had credit cards that helped take advantage of America’s freedoms.


Has your congressmen or senator mentioned to anyone,public or private that this type of law breaking is going on?  Has congress brought any of this information to light?  Has any of the Republican leadership mentioned any of this to the American Public?  The question must be asked. Does any of this information concern you and by the way this is just the tip of the iceberg, You are being lied to kept in the dark and


PATRIOTS IS THIS WHAT REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP BELIEVES?  THEY HAVE STATED  THEY WILL START CATERING TO HISPANICS/MINORITY CLASS (AND THAT INCLUDES) 11-20 MILLION ILLEGAL’S (AMNESTY IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER…

TO SEE HOW MUCH THIS IS COSTING YOU ON A DAILY BASIS,HOW MANY ILLEGALS ARE COMING INTO OUR COUNTRY AND MORE CLICK HERE

Republicans new look-ASS KISSERS-Kissing illegals ASS

20 Mar
COMING TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD-REAL SOON!!

Bethany, OK – On December 21, Bethany Police Chief announced the arrest of Francisco Gomez, 31, who has been charged with multiple drug trafficking charges and is believed to have knowledge of the grisly murder of 19-year-old Carina Saunders.

Gomez’ co-defendant, Jimmy Lee Massey (aka “Big Country”), 33, was already in custody. Both are allegedly members of a drug/sex trafficking ring operating in Oklahoma.

According to an affidavit, Massey has admitted to kidnapping another woman and forcing her to watch as Saunders was tortured to death on October 9, 2011. Massey also told investigators how the young woman’s body was then dismembered.

On October 13, Saunders’ remains were discovered inside a duffel bag behind the Homeland grocery store at NW 23 and Rockwell Avenue. She had been beheaded and could only be indentified through dental records.

Massey also told and investigators that Saunders was killed simply to send a message of to the kidnapped woman as well as other women to comply with those running the prostitution ring.
Chief Cole expects more arrests in the case. Many of those now under investigation are said to be Mexican nationals and the drug/sex trafficking ring is reportedly directly connected to one of the cartels.

Though the mainstream press has failed to report on the growing cartel and Latin American gang violence in this country, beheadings and torture killings are nothing new.

-In 2005, two MS-13 members were convicted in an Alexandria, Va. United States District Court for killing a 17-year-old pregnant girl. A rope was placed around the neck of Brenda Paz, she was then stabbed repeatedly. Her body was then left along the muddy banks of Virginia’s Shenandoah River. The murder was retribution for the girl’s cooperation with a federal investigation into the gang’s activities.

MS-13 (or Mara Salvatrucha) was formed by Salvadoran, mostly illegal immigrants in the 1980’s, during El Salvador’s civil war. While the gang was originally made up exclusively of Salvadorans, they now accept all Central Americans as well as Mexicans. MS stands for Mara (slang for mob), Salva (El Salvador), Trucha (slang for on-guard).

MS-13 began in Los Angeles and as members moved deeper into the country, more loosely structured gangs or cliques were formed. However, these cliques continued to communicate with one another, and the network was formed.

Over the years, MS-13 has become better structured, and the FBI believes that the gang’s L.A. members have a higher status among the group. The gang typically targets high school and even middle school students for recruitment.

-In October 2007, three Mexican nationals were charged with first-degree murder in the death of Mario Lopez, 27, also a Mexican national whose decapitated body was found a month earlier in the Atchafalaya River.

-On April 8, 2008, while testifying before the Florida House of Representatives in support of tougher immigration enforcement measures, Bill Stewart, Deputy Chief of Staff for Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum said: “Florida is the number one state in the nation for human trafficking. And I will just leave you with a recent story that occurred in the panhandle.”

“There were several girls that were trafficked into the panhandle from Mexico. These girls were raped repeatedly over a week’s period of time, and one of them actually resisted while she was being raped.”

“So the smugglers grabbed all of these girls, chained them in chairs, and put them in a room. They brought in the girl who refused to be raped, and they beheaded her, in front of all of the other girls that were in that room. And they left them there, with her body, and those little girls, for several hours,” Stewart concluded.

-In March 2011, police in Chandler, AZ, announced that the man found beheaded in his apartment in October 2010 was killed after he stole from Mexican drug smugglers, who in turn, hired assassins to murder him.

According to Chandler police, Martin Alejandro Cota-Monroy, 38, stole 400 pounds of marijuana and methamphetamine from the El Chapo drug trafficking organization, and told the cartel that the drugs had been seized by the Border Patrol.

When the cartel discovered that Cota-Monroy lied to them, they hired hitmen to kidnap and murder him.

On October 10, 2010, Cota-Monroy’s neighbor found him lying in a pool of blood, decapitated.

Chandler police Detective David Ramer told reporters: “It was a very gruesome scene. Anytime you see a headless body stabbed multiple times, obviously that’s gruesome. And this is a message being sent — not only are they going to kill you but they’re going to dismember your body, and ‘If you cross us, this is what happens.’”

As the cartels and foreign gangs specializing in drug/sex trafficking continue to spread throughout the United States, there will undoubtedly be more little girls forced into prostitution as well as more grisly murder scenes.

Americans need to know that just because the mainstream press doesn’t cover it…doesn’t mean it is not happening.

WRITTEN BY

Dave Gibson, drug cartel Examiner

Dave Gibson, a former legislative aide to a state senator, has been working as a freelance writer for many years. His work has been published in many newspapers and magazines including the Washington Times. He believes that the issue of illegal immigration is the most pressing issue of our time
——————————————————————————————————————————-

GARY GATEHOUSE 

COMMENTS
WHERE IS CONGRESS-WHY HELL THEY ARE BUSY FIGURING OUT NEWS WAYS TO KISS ILLEGAL ASS–AND PATRIOTS IT’S ALL FOR VOTES.

This is just another example of what is wrong with our country, what is wrong with our government both the Republicans and the Communist Democrats, votes comes first!  Legal Americans get to the back of the bus as a matter of fact get the hell off the bus.

Republican party wants to reinvent themselves to be more open to the so called minority population in our country that is a laugh, these minority populations that occupy our country (not all but many) illegally have more say,more attention afforded to them by our elected officials (Congress) than “WE THE PEOPLE”

Further more this is just another prime example of where the so called mainstream media is, where their priorities lie and they damn sure to not inform the American people they cover up for their leader and their leaders party the Communist Democrat Party.

Don’t know about you,but I have had it,WE THE PEOPLE had better stand up and be counted or we are going to wake up someday (it’s coming real soon) and find ourselves the oppressed in our own country that will be ran by a minority that has garnered the power and support of both political parties and we will be left outside the door looking in.

PATRIOTS WE ARE ON OUR OWN..

Illegals-Muslims-Communist all have one thing in common

20 Mar
MUSLIMS-COMMUNIST-SOCIALIST-ILLEGALS
ALL HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON
DESTROY AMERICA

PATRIOTS

WHY IN THE HELL IS OUR COUNTRY, YOUR COUNTRY, MY COUNTRY IN THE MESS IT’S IN? 


HOW DID WE GET TO THIS POINT, WHERE WE HAVE A PERSON IN THE WHITE HOUSE WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT, WHO IS BUMBLING FOOL, A RACIST,A LIAR,A MUSLIM,A  HATER OF AMERICA, A MARXIST, HOW IN THE HELL AMERICA DID WE GET TO THIS POINT .


WE WENT TO SLEEP, WE THOUGHT THAT AMERICA OUR COUNTRY WOULD NEVER EVER BE DESTROYED, WE HAD FAITH IN FELLOW AMERICANS, WE TURNED OUR COUNTRY OVER TO THOSE WE BELIEVED WOULD DO THE RIGHT THING,THEN WE WENT TO SLEEP. NOT YESTERDAY,NOT LAST YEAR, DECADES AGO,WE CLOSED OUR POLITICAL EYES AND EARS, JUST ROLLED OVER AND WENT TO SLEEP!!
 

Patriots , all we say is true about conservatives-but let’s be honest here, we have been asleep at the wheel, and to be quite honest a lot of us were and are just too damn timid,to intimidated ,afraid to speak up for ourselves,afraid to be tagged a racist,a conservative,afraid we just won’t fit in with our liberal friends, and YES as a WHITE PERSON I am going to say this TO stand up for our RACE.   


We are all guilty including myself. But,it is NOT TO LATE to take our country back from the brink, from all the rift raft that now run it, just look at the Republican Party and their so called leadership, it’s a DAMN JOKE 

The only thing and I mean the only thing on the political scene that represents America and conservatives is the TEA PARTY movement, they are the only legitimate group of PATRIOTS in the country when it comes time to stand up against the left.

Let me reiterate we conservatives-we patriots young and old are all at fault for the way our country is–we just fell asleep a long time ago, and are just now waking to the fact that our country is in FLAMES!!!

BOTTOM LINE IT IS NOW OR NEVER,STAND UP OR SIT DOWN AND FOREVER SHUT OUR MOUTHS,THIS IS THE FINAL QUARTER, THE FINAL GAME. THE LOSER GETS NOTHING BUT GRIEF! 

Obama talking about creating a National Police Force

11 Mar

Remember this? Obama talking about creating a National Police Force

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation’s military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: (Obama said July 2nd 2008) “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Now, since I’ve never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase “civilian national security force” before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

What does it mean?

If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

Are we talking about creating a police state here?

The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. Defense budget was $439 billion.

Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that?

If not, why did he say it? What did he mean? Where in the Constitution does he see justification for the federal government creating such a domestic army?

((Wnd 2008)

February 24th,2011

Patriots, yesterday Obama and his DOJ weasel said they would no long enforce a law passed by Congress under the administration of William Jefferson Clinton-the Marriage act,

He said he no longer believes that law is constitutional thus he will not enforce it. Folks, I don’t think the impact of what he said yesterday has taken hold in the American community yet, in essence what he is doing is not upholding the constitution, he (in my own opinion) is stating he is going to cherry pick laws and only uphold what is advantageous to him,he regime and his socialist agenda.

The question must be asked, if he is going to circumvent the Constitution right in front of our face, what is he doing behind closed doors, is he building a civilian police force, where is he going to recruit for this police force, where is the money coming from (remember not all the bail out money has been spent or for that matter completely accounted for) What community of people will sign up for this national police force?

Unions, are already the enforcers of Obama politics (Wisconsin-Indiana-Ohio), could Obama recruit Black Panthers,MS13 gangs, union thugs,could this be the basis for a National Obama police Force?

This blog is just asking the question, why did Obama speak of a National Civilian Police Force, why did he make that part of a speech in 2008, he laid out exactly what that police force would consist of , is this still part of his plan? Is this what he will do in order to control WE THE PEOPLE -could this be the NEW

Patriots, has he already (behind closed doors) started laying the groundwork for that police force, is he comtemplaitng a police force to enforce his Socialist/Marxist agenda?

Looking at what Obama has done so far, his complete lack of respect for our constitution, his minions in congress (Democrats most are registered socialist) who also, turn their back on the constitution, and that 30-35 percent of the American people who are socialist, who are willing accomplices to the Obama socialist agenda, who in my own humble opinion would have NO problem with a national police force. I say YES these are valid questions

We as American patriots should be very concerned,we cannot and should not trust the Socialist left not now not EVER

STAY VIGILANT STAY FOCUSED -WE I FEAR ARE HEADED FOR SOME VERY DARK DAYS IN OUR COUNTRY

Public Schools-THE SOCIALIST INDOCTRINATION ARM OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

7 Mar



Public Schools-THE SOCIALIST INDOCTRINATION ARM OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY




THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD TAKING CARE OF AMERICA’S CHILDREN-ABORTION-HOMOSEXUALITY-SAME SEX MARRIAGE-UNDERMINING Parental Rights

ALL PART OF THE NEA AGENDA

The National Education Association (NEA) is the largest professional organization and labor union in the U.S. and its influence on education reaches around the world. Their power and influence extends from the walls of the school room to legislative halls as they promote and finance various candidates ((FYI the National Education Association has donated millions of dollars to Democrat Candiates at all levels but has never donated one dime to conservaive/Republican canidatates)) and initiatives and work to assure their ideology is entrenched in culture. But what many people may not know, including teachers and parents, is that the NEA is not a friend of the family.

Abortion

At their convention in New Orleans the NEA leadership once again defeated an abortion neutrality resolution. However, each year since 1990 this resolution has been reaffirmed:
“The NEA supports family planning, including the right to reproductive freedom…. The NEA will oppose any legislation which will erode the status of Roe v. Wade…”
The NEA has over 3.2 million members in the U.S. and hardly any of them know that the union that they pay annual dues to is one of the most ardent abortion supporters in the country and that their dues may be helping finance pro-abortion efforts around the world.

((THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION AGENDA))

Homosexual Advocacy
The NEA is squarely in the back pocket of gay advocates. The Wall Street Journal reported (2006) that the NEA gave $65 million to liberal groups such as the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), the Human Rights Campaign, and People for the American Way. They oppose the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and in 2009, a resolution was passed to oppose any efforts to put in place amendments banning same-sex unions or marriage:
“NEA will support its affiliates in opposing state constitutional and/or statutory provisions that could have the effect of prohibiting the state and its political subdivisions from providing the same rights and benefits to same-sex couples as are provided to similarly situated heterosexual couples…”

Millions of NEA dollars have been spent on such creating and promoting publications such as:

• “Understanding Gay and Lesbian Students through Diversity”
• “Just the Facts” (A 24-page booklet created by the NEA and the American Psychological Association. In 2008, the booklet was sent to 16,000 school districts and it tells students that homosexuality is a “normal expression of human sexuality.”)
• “Focus on Gays, Lesbian, Bisexuals and Transgendered Persons”
• “A Report on GLBT People in Education: Stepping out of the Closet, Into the Light”
The bulk of these informational pieces are part of a well-orchestrated attempt to provide a platform on which to mainstream homosexual behavior in the schools. One goal is to mandate anti-bullying” and “anti-discrimination” policies that will provide special protection to homosexual-related categories such as “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression.” UFI believes that schools should provide protection against harassment and bullying to every child, for any reason, equally. To see a list studies and talking points that give rebuttal to the NEA’s “Just the Facts” booklet go here.

Parental Rights
The NEA, in spite of their rhetoric, is not a friend to parents. It appears that the NEA, not parents, “know best.” The NEA is in league with groups such as Planned Parenthood and SEICUS to promote what they call “Comprehensive Sex Education” in the schools. The NEA recommends that parents not be allowed to “opt out” their children when comprehensive sex education and “diversity” curriculum is being taught.
They oppose laws that require parental notification for abortion or contraception distribution. NEA supports the abolishment of “heterosexism” (the belief that heterosexual behavior is superior to homosexual behavior) in the schools and that curriculum that promotes “anti-discrimination and equality for all members of the GLBTQ community” should supersede any wishes that parents might have regarding the teaching of their children.

Conclusion
Our school districts are populated with amazing and hardworking teachers. Please know that we are not castigating educators individually, but the union to which many are required to belong and pay dues.
The NEA is powerful and wields great influence over schools, the legislative and public policy environment, and the culture at large. Teachers need to consider how their dues are being spent and work to change the leadership of their union. Please be aware and get involved.
Parents, please be actively involved in your schools. If you hold conservative and traditional family values, social or economic, be assured that the NEA doesn’t share them and they are aggressively engaged in promulgating their values at the expense of your children. Don’t under estimate the power that you have as a parent and constituent of a school district and don’t feel like you’re alone–most parents share your values and concerns.

Get involved and make the next school year a family-friendly one!

written by United Families International
Folks the National Education Association is the one socialist organization/union that has access to the future of America,through our children.

They are teaching socialism,secularism,undermining the American family,Christian beliefs all for the good of their SOCIALIST AGENDA.


They have been in bed with the Democrat party since DAY ONE!!