Archive | america bama texas arizona california liberal socialist united nations militia muslim birth certificate nea education taxpayers magazine news RSS feed for this section

BENGHAZI HEARINGS -IT’S JUST WINDOW DRESSING

8 May

BENGHAZI HEARINGS -IT’S JUST WINDOW DRESSING

may82013benghazibanner    may82013benghaziterrorist    may82013ambassador

How many times have we Conservatives said in the past months “IF A REPUBLICAN (S) DID THAT THE DEMOCRATS WOULD HANG THEM OUT TO DRY, IMPEACH THEM. HELL LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED AT WATERGATE”

may82013nixion

We have all said that at one time or another right. If the shoe were on the other foot the Democrats would be going after all Republicans and military involved in the incident , they would have hearings never ending hearings. Remember Watergate? Nobody was killed in that incident,it was a bunch of low level crooks that had nothing to lose but in the end the media and the Democrat Party brought down the President of the United States (Richard Nixon) and almost destroyed the Republican Party.

The Communist Democrat party never gave up they kept up the pursuit,they kept the Watergate incident in front of the American people, making accusations,fingering pointing, KGB tactics, and in the end like I said “THEY BROUGHT DOWN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES”. I have to hand it to the Communist Democrats they never give up, Democrats past and present are (were) well versed on the tactics of the KGB

MAY82013OLLIENORTH

Remember Iran Contra? Remember the Democrats parading Colonel Oliver North in his Marine uniform  in front of national television cameras,remember the tenacity of the questioning by the Democrat Party, remember the media and their finger pointing and accusations?

MAINSTREAM MEDIA -PROPAGANDA MACHINE FOR THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THE OBAMA REGIME

AMBASSADORTOLYBIA4

Back to the Benghazi incident,The so called mainstream media would be beating the drum 24/7, Democrats in congress would have a constant parade of Republicans, military on the television screen, asking them and accusing them of turning their backs on the people that were killed and those wounded.

Now let’s get back to the real story, the Republican party, the Republican leadership says nothing, they are silent (can you hear the crickets ?) oh sure there are a couple who are making a effort but in my own opinion it is all WINDOW DRESSING, where are those serving in congress who were in the military at one time,where are all the so called conservative’s? I’ll tell you where they are HIDING UNDER THEIR DESK!

may82013hillaryOBAMA-HILLARY LIE-PEOPLE DIE

PATRIOTS in the end after these phony hearings have faded away, there will be no repercussions suffered by Hillary Clinton,Obama,Rice, the State Department,the Pentagon. It will all just go away, and those like Lindsey Graham,and his cohorts will tic off another plus on their political resume.

I’m sorry but I have no faith what so ever in the process,the outcome, it is ALL SHOW and that is as far as it will go

PATRIOTS WE ARE ON OUR OWN-WE  HAVE NO REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON

LISTEN TO THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW

CLICK HERE

Advertisements

THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION UNIONS- REVOLUTIONARY GOALS

25 Dec

THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION UNIONS- REVOLUTIONARY GOALS TO CHANGE AMERICA THROUGH THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
A LOOK INTO THE HISTORY OF THE RADICAL NEA AGENDA

1880. The National Council of Education (NCE) was established. An exclusive forum for leaders in position of influence and power, in included John Dewey, G. Stanley Hall, Charles Eliot and James Russell. Here they would discuss progressive ideas, blend psychology and evolutionary ‘science’ into a new vision of human progress, and lay the foundation for America’s planned transformation. B-43 Samuel Blumenfeld described their aims in NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education:

    “…to create the kinds of schools and curricula which would produce, if not perfect men, at least the kinds of men and women the educators considered desirable.

           “The most important idea that would influence the educators was that of evolution…. It was all ‘matter in motion’ and it fit in very well with the dialectical materialism of the atheist Marxists who were now able to link man’s physical evolution with his social evolution.”

1912. The NEA saw sex education as a useful tool in their values-changing process.

1933. Rockefeller Foundation president Matt Mason told trustees that “The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control…. the control of human behavior. (Together with the Carnegie Institute, it was also funding eugenics research

1948. The NEA… produced a set of international guidelines called Education for International Understanding in American Schools – Suggestions and Recommendations. It included this statement:

1948. B.F. Skinner (1972 Humanist of the Year) described a society in which children are reared by the State.

“The idea has become established that the preservation of international peace and order may require that force be used to compel a nation to conduct its affairs within the framework of an established world system. The most modern expression of this doctrine of collective security is in the United Nations Charter… Many persons believe that enduring peace cannot be achieved so long as the nation-state system continues as at present constituted. It is a system of international anarchy.”

1948The NEA was funded in part by the Carnegie Corporation.

1956. Former teacher, Communist and Union organizer, Dr. Bella Dodd states, “…the Communist party whenever possible wanted to use the Teacher’s Union for political purposes but the party had a definite interest in education also. The Communists in the Teachers’ Union were for progressive education. We were its most vocal and enthusiastic supporters…. Most of the programs we advocated, the NEA followed the next year or so.”

1962. An editorial in the Chicago Sun-Times states: “…real control over the nation’s children is being shifted rapidly to the NEA. That organization has about completed the job of cartelizing public schools education under … an organization known as the National Council for Accreditation of Teachers Education, an agency whose governing council is tightly NEA controlled. … The manner in which the NEA is usurping parental prerogatives… is…very simple: control the education and hiring of teachers.”

1967. Working with the educational establishment, Carl Rogers (1964 Humanist of the Year) wrote a book called “A Plan for Self-Directed Change in an Educational System:” “…the goal of education must be to develop individuals who are open to change… The goal of education must be to develop a society in which people can live more comfortably with change than with rigidity.”

 1969. In Schools without Failure, psychiatrist William Glasser wrote: “We have to let students know there are no right answers… and may alternatives to certainty and right answer.”

1970. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), the curriculum arm of the NEA, published To Nurture Humaneness: Commitment for the ’70’s [NEA, 1970). The visionary statements of its authors are coming true in our times:

       “The old order is passing…. The controls of the past were sacred…. Social controls cannot be left to blind chance and unplanned change — usually attributed to God. Man must be the builder of new forms of social organizations…. Here education must play a stellar role.” (Dan W. Dodson, Professor of Educational Sociology at N. Y. University)

      “The school will need to be supplemented by neighborhood family centers which provide infant care and developmental activity…. Education may well begin at birth in cooperative family centers. (Francis Chase, Professor Emeritus of the University of Chicago)

      “Many daily decisions and value judgments now made by the individual will soon be made for him… How to plan for one’s children’s education will be partially taken out of his hands. (John Loughary, Professor of Education at the University of Oregon.”

 Chester Pierce, Professor of Education and Psychiatry at Harvard tells the Association for Childhood Education International in Denver that “every child in American entering schools at the age of five is insane because he comes to schools with certain allegiances toward our founding father, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity…

1972. NEA president Catherine Barrett said, “We are the biggest potential political striking force in this country, and we are determined to control the direction of education.”

       “Those who rose highest in the public schools establishment and the NEA were those most strongly committed to secularism and statism,” wrote Blumenfeld. Those two complementary philosophies fueled the vision of NEA leaders who sought an utopian world, freed from Biblical constraints and ruled by humanist politicians and taught by progressive educators. Parental rights and religious freedom would be swallowed up by the surpassing rights and rules of the greater community — the controlled collective.

1981. In his book, All Our Children Learning, Dr. Benjamin Bloom (called “the father of Outcome-Based Education) wrote that “the purpose of education and the schools is to change the thoughts, feelings and actions of students.”

1992 Marc Tucker, director of the National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE — began as an agency within the Carnegie Foundation) and the master-mind behind this partnership between schools and labor, proposed “breaking the current system, root and branch.” He said, “Our objective will require a change in the prevailing culture–the attitudes, values, norms, and accepted ways of doing things.”

In a post election letter to Hillary Clinton,  wrote, “What is essential . . . is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one’s skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same for everyone…a system of unending skill development that begins in the home and continues through school, post-secondary education and the workplace.”

GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS
Patriots, and we wonder how our country got in the mess it’s in, our public school system under the control of the National Education Association ( a strong arm education union that is part of the Democrat socialist/Marxist/communist/progressive movement) is NOT teaching our children, they are indoctrinating them .

Look no further than the OCCUPIER movement, a prime example of the success the NEA and the Democrats Socialist have enjoyed…

Patriots, our country our children,our families our christian religion is under attack, our morals,our ethics are under attack,our constitution, our history, are under attack by the National Education Association and the Democrat/socialist/Marxist/communist/progressive left…

WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE

7 Dec
A Story with Two Starting Points and Only One Conclusion

Starting Point #1: “They wouldn’t print a headline in the New York Times if there weren’t a story to go with it.”


Starting Point #2: “All those women making sexual harassment charges against Herman Cain has to mean that SOMETHING happened.”


Conclusion: If snow fell for two weeks during July in Miami, FL, the mainstream media (MSM) would not investigate the phenomenon in order to report on its origin and etiology, but would summon up its all-purpose fictitious “expert” to beard for the WHOLLY fabricated opinion that snow in the tropics in July “must be related to climate change.” In journalism’s carny show, such an exchange of non-existent values is referred  to as “bullshit washing bullshit.”


On still another front, all sorts of people are giving themselves headaches diagnosing the implosion of our lower and higher educational systems.  The truth is that the education of our young was deliberately corrupted in order to deprive them not only of their heritage (national, familial and religious) and traditional sources of authority, but even worse, of the faculty of critical thinking, so that preposterous conclusions like the one cited above might go down without so much as a wrinkling of the nose.


When we have identified the people who butchered education, and likewise the people who profit by that betrayal of the patria, we find that they are one  and the same group, i.e., Radical Liberal professional people, scions of the Upper Middle Class, Malignant Narcissists who coerce the rest of us into  adhering to multiculturalism and  political correctness, speech codes and dietary regulations to facilitate their installation of European nanny-statism, the civic ordination whereby spoiled adult brats who brook no restrictions on their personal behavior can yet claim to be people of conscience through the practice of altruism at the tax-payers’ expense.


I was actually foolish enough to believe for twenty years that eventually, the very success of the media in covering for the Democrats/Liberals would lead the latter into byways of outrageous effrontery that would at length ring down the curtain on their Saturnalia.  Well, media coverage has led to just that result many times, but by the time it started to do so the popular mind was so numb to finesse that instead of Joe Bag of Doughnuts seeing through the whole charade and blowing the whistle on it, Joe is the guy over there going, “Well if it’s snowing bimbos in Florida this time of year, it has to be man-made global warming!”


Ladies and gentlemen, the media and the educators have collectively lobotomized the American people, all the better to manipulate them through fear, confusion and sensation.



Conservatives Speak Out Exclusive Commentary
Written by: Don Thompson


Ignorant America: Just How Ignorant Are We?

24 Oct
Ignorant America: Just How Stupid Are We?

Millions of Americans are embarrassingly ill-informed and they do not care that they are

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” — Thomas Jefferson

Just how stupid are we? Pretty stupid, it would seem, when we come across headlines like this: “Homer Simpson, Yes — 1st Amendment ‘Doh,’ Survey Finds” (Associated Press 3/1/06).


    “About 1 in 4 Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment (freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.) 

But more than half of Americans can name at least two members of the fictional cartoon family, according to a survey.


    “The study by the new McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that 22 percent of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just 1 in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms.”


But what does it mean exactly to say that American voters are stupid? About this there is unfortunately no consensus. Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, who confessed not knowing how to define pornography, we are apt simply to throw up our hands in frustration and say: We know it when we see it. But unless we attempt a definition of some sort, we risk incoherence, dooming our investigation of stupidity from the outset. Stupidity cannot mean, as Humpty Dumpty would have it, whatever we say it means.

Five defining characteristics of stupidity, it seems to me, are readily apparent. 

First, is sheer ignorance: Ignorance of critical facts about important events in the news, and ignorance of how our government functions and who’s in charge.

Second, is negligence: The disinclination to seek reliable sources of information about important news events. 

Third, is wooden-headedness, as the historian Barbara Tuchman defined it: The inclination to believe what we want to believe regardless of the facts. 

Fourth, is shortsightedness: The support of public policies that are mutually contradictory, or contrary to the country’s long-term interests. 

Fifth, and finally, is a broad category I call bone-headedness, for want of a better name: The susceptibility to meaningless phrases, stereotypes, irrational biases, and simplistic diagnoses and solutions that play on our hopes and fears.

American Ignorance


Taking up the first of our definitions of stupidity, how ignorant are we? Ask the political scientists and you will be told that there is damning, hard evidence pointing incontrovertibly to the conclusion that millions are embarrassingly ill-informed and that they do not care that they are. 

There is enough evidence that one could almost conclude — though admittedly this is a stretch — that we are living in an Age of Ignorance

By Rick Shenkman

LISTEN TO THE “GETTIN AFTER LEFTY CONSERVATIVE TALK SHOW” JUST CLICK ON PLAYER BELOW

19 Jun
1932 JOHN DEWEY  honorary president of the NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
POLITICS OF THE NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS
BOTH LEFT WING SOCIALIST/UNIONS THAT WERE ESTABLISHED TO SUPPORT/TEACH AND INDOCTRINATE THE YOUNG PEOPLE OF AMERICA INTO THE WORLD OF SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM

National Education Association (NEA)

The National Education Association is the largest union in the U.S. and one of the most powerful political forces in the nation

National Headquarters
1201 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Basic Facts:

Total Receipts – $377,365,590
Political Activities and Lobbying – $50,408,080
Contributions, Gifts, and Grants $89,164,816
Members – 3,321,881
Source: NEA’s 2009 LM-2 filing with the U.S. Department of Labor

The NEA largely escapes public notice as a union, but its attitude should be a front-burner concern for parents. The NEA’s Oregon affiliate has stated that “the major purpose of our association is not the education of children, rather it is, or ought to be the extension and/or preservation of our members’ rights.”
Like almost all unions, the NEA vigorously fights competition. The organization challenges any hint of education reform that would increase teacher accountability or allow for charter schools or other forms of school choice. In 1993, Forbes reported:

Last year the NEA-affiliated California Teachers Association used unprecedented tactics to disrupt the effort to place a school initiative on the ballot – including blocking would-be signators’ access to the petition in shopping malls, allegedly sabotaging the petition with fake names and offering a signature-collecting firm $400,000 to decline the account.

And the NEA isn’t afraid to align itself with disreputable organizations to achieve its goal of killing reform. It gave a large grant to a group called the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), which has been tied to voter fraud in a dozen states, government-grant fraud, and even union-busting. The purpose of the money was simply listed as “NCLB” — No Child Left Behind, the legislative bane of the union’s existence.

That the NEA would give money to ACORN — and nearly $250,000 of its members’ money to a 2004 political campaign in Florida run by ACORN and beset by allegations of voter fraud — begins to make sense in light of the groups’ shared radical philosophy. Both organizations were profoundly influenced by Rules for Radicals author and self-avowed Marxist Saul Alinsky, whose teachings advocated that education union organizers not let teachers “fraternize with the enemy” because “distance helps you polarize the issue.”

The “singleness of purpose” a union organizer must have, wrote Alinsky, is “the ability to build a power base.”
Author Peter Brimelow has gone so far as to allege that “the entire raison d’etre of the National Education Association is political. It’s engaged in what economists call rent-seeking — using political and institutional power to extract money from society.” The NEA reported spending $25 million on political activities in its fiscal year 2005. But financial disclosures don’t show the full extent of the power of the union, which also boasts an army of paid political operatives that is bigger than the staff of the Republican and Democratic National Committees combined.

There is no doubt where the union’s political allegiances lie, even if they don’t correspond to their members’ political beliefs. Between 1990 and 2008, ninety-three percent of donations made by National Education Association political action committees and individual officers went to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. But the NEA admits that only 45 percent of public school teachers are Democrats.
In its fiscal year 2007, the NEA spent $80.5 million — more than 20 percent of its entire budget — on “contributions, gifts and grants” that largely funded left-wing and non-education-related causes, including drives to raise the minimum wage and campaigns to kill Social Security reform.

As a Wall Street Journal editorial noted, the union’s financial disclosure forms “expose the union as a honey pot for left-wing political causes that have nothing to do with teachers, much less students.” Left-leaning recipients of teachers’ forced dues include the following organizations:

ACORN

American Rights at Work

Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance
Ballot Initiative Strategy Center
Business and Professional Women/USA
Campaign for America’s Future
Center for Community Change
Center for Policy Alternatives
Children’s Defense Fund
Communities for Quality Education
Communities United to Strengthen America
Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute
Democratic GAIN
Democratic Leadership Council

Early Vote Denver
Economic Policy Institute

Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network 

GLAAD
Human Rights Campaign
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies

Labor Council for Latin American Advancement
Latina Initiative
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

League of Rural Voters

Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
NAACP
National Association for Bilingual Education
National Council of La Raza

National Partnership for Women & Families
National Women’s Law Center

People for the American Way
RainbowPUSH Coalition

Sierra Club
Southern Christian Leadership Conference
The Citizenship Project
The National Coalition on Black Civic Participation
The Task Force Foundation
USAction
Women’s Campaign Forum
Women’s Voices, Women Vote
Working America

The NEA also poured teachers’ money in the following state-level ballot initiatives:

Arizona Minimum Wage Coalition
Citizens for Education
Citizens Who Support Maine’s Public Schools
Citizens United to Protect Our Public Safety
Coloradans for a Fair Minimum Wage
Coloradans for Excellent Schools
Coloradans for Responsible Reform
Committee to Protect Our Children’s Legacy
Conserving Arizona’s Future
Creating Arizona’s Future
Give Missourians a Raise
Give Nevada a Raise
Nebraskans Against 423
Nebraskans for the Goodlife
Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97
Ohioans for a Fair Minimum Wage
Utahns for Public Schools

American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
The smaller of the two national education unions, though no less contentious, the American Federation of Teachers is an affiliate of the AFL-CIO.

National Headquarters
555 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Basic Facts:
Total Receipts – $223,976,034
Political Activities and Lobbying – $18,808,729
Contributions, Gifts, and Grants – $3,655,152
Members – 887,567
Source: AFT’s 2009 LM-2 filing with the U.S. Department of Labor

The smaller of two national education unions, though no less contentious, the AFT is an affiliate of the AFL-CIO.

Like its AFL-CIO brothers, the AFT indulges in the language of conflict. Among its bank accounts are a “solidarity fund” and a “militancy/defense fund” — the union’s single largest war chest, with more than $31 million in the bank at last count.

The AFT’s militant behavior is best illustrated by its association with one group in particular: the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).

In 2004, the union spent $100,000 of its members’ money on a minimum wage ballot campaign in Florida. That campaign, designed to increase voter turnout for the Democratic presidential candidate, was run by ACORN, which has been tied to voter fraud in at least 10 states. Undaunted by the fraud that beset that campaign, the AFT’s New York state federation paid the radical group more than $125,000 to organize teachers.

The AFT isn”t afraid to flex its financial muscle in the policy realm, either. In its fiscal year 2005, the union spent $7.7 million on government relations (influencing their own employers) and almost $5.5 million on public affairs (indirectly influencing their own employers).

And while there are countless AFT members who don’t like the causes the union supports, there is no one who condones the fraud seen by local AFT unions. One of the most egregious examples of union staff taking advantage of their members comes from the AFT’s Washington, DC affiliate, which lost $5 million to embezzlement.

The union’s 2007 financial filings with the Department of Labor show that it gave members’ money to the following left-leaning organizations:

Alliance for Retired Americans
American Friends of Yitzhak Rabin Center
American Rights at Work
Americans for Democratic Action
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance
Ballot Initiative Strategy Center
Center for National Policy
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Children’s Defense Fund
Citizens for Tax Justice
Coalition of Labor Union Women
Committee for Education Funding
Congressional Black Caucus Foundation
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute
Economic Policy Institute
Labor Council for Latin American Advancement
Labor Project for Working Families
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
NAACP
National Association for Bilingual Education
National Black Caucus of State Legislators
National Conference of Democratic Mayors
National Labor College
Pride at Work
The American Prospect
The National Coalition on Black Civic Participation
The National Public Pension Coalition
Union of Palestinian Teachers
William J. Clinton Foundation
Women’s Policy, Inc.
Workers Independent News
The union’s filings also reveal contributions to the following state-level ballot initiatives:
Citizens for Education
Citizens Who Support Maine’s Public Schools
Coloradans for a Fair Minimum Wage
Give Missourians a Raise
Ohioans for a Fair Minimum Wage
Misc. initiative contributions

AND WE CONTINUE TO SEND OUR CHILDREN TO THESE SOCIALIST INDOCTRINATION CLINICS -HOW ABOUT AMERICA HOW ABOUT PARENTS WHEN WILL YOU TAKE THESE PEOPLE TO TASK–THEY ARE DESTROYING OUR CHILDREN

*soucrce TEACHER UNIONS EXPOSED http://www.teachersunionexposed.com/unions.c

18 May
AMERICAN HERO
Alert Message to US citizens
No one has been able to explain to me why young men and women who serve in the U.S. Military for 20 years, risking their lives protecting freedom, only get 50% of their pay upon retirement. While Politicians hold their political positions in the safe confines of the capital, protected by these same men and women, and receive full pay retirement after serving one term.
It just does not make any sense.
Monday on Fox news it was learned that the staffers of Congressional members are exempt from having to pay back student loans. This will get national attention if other news networks will broadcast it. Just where will all of it stop?

This is an idea that we should address.
For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. 
The latest is to exempt themselves from the Healthcare Reform... in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn’t seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don’t care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop.

If each person that receives this will forward it on to 20 people, in three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message.. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: “Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.”

Ladies and Gentlemen our government sends our young men and women to war, we military folks past and present have marched off to war to protect our country,sent there by congress and the President of the United States. We have been asked by our country to fight those wars not only protect our families but all families,including the congress and their families.
(Author unknown)
,
GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS
Look at the picture of that young Marine,he has been wounded,his face is disfigured, if he stays in the Marines for 20 years he will get 50 percent of his pay at retirement, yet a person in congress will receive 100 percent after just one tour or term.

This is where America is today, a Congress that has turned it’s back on the American people a congress that is inept, unable to lead, yet they reap all the benefits that they themselves voted in.

This is not right, It is time for all Americans to stand and tell congress you are no better than the constituents/Americans you represent.. It is time for the 28th Amendment to be voted on and those who vote against it, will be thrown out on their ass. 

AMERICAN THIS IS YOU COUNTRY AND THESE CON MEN THAT CALL THEMSELVES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST BE PUT ON NOTICE ..

“CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW THAT APPLIES TO CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES THAT DOES NOT APPLY EQUALLY TO THE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES

WE THE PEOPLE MUST DEMAND THIS

30 Apr
545 vs. 300,000,000 People
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall.  No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating  deficits. only the President can  propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The speaker of the House? John Boehner

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want.  If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal  government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it’s because they want them in  Iraq and Afghanistan …

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they  alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…
We should vote all of  them out of office and clean up their mess!

written by: Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando  Sentinel  Newspaper.