Archive | COMMUNISM RSS feed for this section
14 May

Communists in Congress

Florida Rep. Allen West received considerable flak after claiming that there were up to eighty “communists” in the US Congress
.

Rep West was certainly correct in spirit. There are dozens of members of the US Congress who have strong ties to one or more of America’s several influential Marxist organizations.

Congress members with documentable connections to the US hard left.
Michigan freshman Democratic Congressman Hansen Clarke represents the state’s 13th District and serves on the Homeland Security and Science, Space and Technology committees.

A former Chief of Staff to Michigan’s pro-Marxist Congressman John Conyers, Hansen Clarke seems to be following in his former mentor’s political footsteps.

Over many years, Congressman Clarke has openly aligned himself with the highly influential Detroit local of the US’ largest Marxist organization, Democratic Socialists of America.

Reaffirming a relationship that began several years ago, Congressman Clarke personally presented awards at Greater Detroit DSA’s 12th annual Frederick Douglass-Eugene V. Debs Dinner on October 1st at UAW Local 600 in Dearborn, Michigan.

Clarke presented Congressional citations to far leftist, the Reverend Ed Rowe and to the Restaurant Opportunities Center-Michigan.
Other speakers included an event regular, Metropolitan Detroit AFL-CIO President Saundra Williams and newly appointed DSA National Director Maria Svart.

Hansen Clarke’s relationship with DSA goes back to at least 2002.
In that year, Greater Detroit Democratic Socialists of America contributed to the primary campaign of Hansen Clarke, who ran against incumbent State Senator Ray Murphy in the 1st District. The local did some early fundraising and conducted a postcard campaign on Clarke’s behalf to its members in the 1st Senate District. Hansen Clarke achieved an upset victory, winning comfortably by thirteen points.

Greater Detroit DSA boasts a “simple but effective electoral strategy.”
We endorse progressive candidates in competitive races where the focused efforts of a small group such as ours can tip the balance in favor of the progressive candidate.

This strategy has served us well in electing state representatives such as Steve Bieda, Alma Wheeler Smith, John Espinoza, Aldo Vagnozzi, and Fred Miller, and state senators such as Gilda Jacobs and Hansen Clarke.

Hansen Clarke also has a close working relationship with one of the US’ most extreme Marxist-Leninist organizations – the pro-North Korea/Cuban Workers World Party.

In 2008 Hansen Clarke worked closely with Detroit leaders of the Workers World Party on the house foreclosures issue. Clarke drafted and sponsored SB 1306 with long time WWP collaborator Reverend Ed Rowe of Central United Methodist Church, a co–initiator of the Moratorium NOW! organization. Rowe further pledged ongoing support to the coalition, whose office is in his church. Most key leaders and personnel in Moratorium NOW! are also Workers World Party activists. Writing in Workers World on Jan. 14, 2008, Detroit WWP leader Kris Hamel discussed the origins of Moratorium NOW!

“More than 400,000 jobs have been lost in the state since 2001. Now, that economic crisis has extended nationwide… According to a report issued on June 5 by the Mortgage Bankers Association, approximately one of every 11 mortgages in the U.S. was past due or in foreclosure at the end of March… Falling home values have left many homeowners with mortgages in excess of the value of their homes… The Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop

Foreclosures and Evictions is organizing around the state to win passage of SB 1306, a two-year moratorium introduced into the Michigan Legislature by state Sen. Hansen Clarke. In 2007, activists with the Michigan Emergency Committee Against War and Injustice began to popularize the idea of a foreclosure moratorium based on the emergency powers invested in the governor by the state constitution during times of disaster.

Demonstrations were held at the state capitol in Lansing demanding that Gov. Jennifer Granholm declare a state of economic emergency and impose a moratorium to stop foreclosures and evictions.“

Hansen Clarke became heavily involved in the WWP campaign, in 2008, when a Detroit family, the Maxwells, were faced with losing their home. According to the Workers World, “the dumpster was returned to the Maxwell home on the morning of April 23, one week after “community activists” successfully emptied it and moved the family’s belongings back into their foreclosed home on Detroit’s near northwest side.” An emergency demonstration called by the WWP front Moratorium NOW!, convened at the home in the afternoon in solidarity with the Maxwells and “all those facing foreclosure in Detroit.”
Activists with another WWP front, the Michigan Emergency Committee Against War and Injustice, theMichigan Welfare Rights Organization, ACORN, and other groups participated.

An emergency motion was filed in Detroit’s 36th District Court to set aside the judgment for eviction entered by the court on Feb. 28. On April 25, community activists packed the courtroom with the Maxwell family as Judge E. Lynise Bryant-Weekes heard arguments on why the family should be allowed to stay in their home. After the hearing, as supporters gathered in the corridor outside the courtroom, Maureen Taylor of Michigan Welfare Rights Organization stated: “This proves that poor people have no rights, that if you can’t afford an attorney, so be it. Poor people cannot get justice in a courtroom. We need to keep fighting.”

Detroit WWP leader Abayomi Azikiwe of Michigan Emergency Committee Against War and Injustice, told Workers World: “This is precisely why we need a moratorium. There are thousands of families like the Maxwells all throughout Metro Detroit. We need to step up the struggle to force the state legislature to enact the two-year foreclosure moratorium law. We can’t wait another day.”

MECAWI organizer and WWP leader Jerry Goldberg spoke at the Labor and Community Conference held at United Auto Workers Region 1A on April 26. Sponsored by the Labor Studies Center of the University of Michigan, the conference linked community issues such as health care and the environment to the labor struggle. Goldberg spoke on the foreclosure crisis and motivated the audience to support the two-year mortgage foreclosure moratorium introduced by State Sen. Hansen Clarke. Participants “signed up to support the bill and responded enthusiastically to the developing struggle.”

Abayomi Azikiwe and State Senator Hansen Clarke co-chaired a Town Hall Meeting on June 14, 2008 at UAW Local 7 in Detroit. The event, a statewide organizers’ conference, demanded the passage of Hansens’ SB 1306, imposing a two-year moratorium on foreclosures in Michigan
Workers World Party leaders Jerry Goldberg and Abayomi Azikiwe, with Hansen Clarke, June 14, 2008

Later that year, 72 year-old Rubie Curl-Pinkins was threatened with eviction from her home behind the James Cole Funeral Home on West Grand Boulevard. Hundreds of neighbors, relatives, church members and activists from the Moratorium Now! Coalition, Call ‘em Out, ACORN and State Senator Hansen Clarke and his staff rallied against Countrywide Home Loans/Bank of America, which planned to evict her family July 25, 2008.

The rally went on from 4 PM until almost midnight and was given extensive coverage by Detroit’s Channel Seven, which also interviewed Clarke about his pending bill for a two-year moratorium on foreclosures, S.B. 1306.

Unlike many other Detroiters facing foreclosure, Ms. Pinkins had the money to pay what she owed on the home, obtained through a reverse mortgage. Her attorneys, WWP affiliate Vanessa Fluker and WWP member Jerry Goldberg together with Bruce Feaster of Clarke’s office said Countrywide earlier lured her into a predatory adjustable-rate second mortgage at a 10 percent interest rate

Workers World Party leader Abayomi Azikiwe, Sen. Hansen Clarke, Rubie Curl-Pinkins, WWP member Alan Pollock, Debbie Williams, unidentified man and WWP member Sandra Hines on the porch of the Curl-Pinkins home in Detroit, Aug. 22, 2008

Hansen Clarke’s ties to the Workers World Party went beyond the anti-foreclosure campaign.

In 2009, Hansen Clarke was listed as an endorser of the Committee to Defend Diane Bukowski and Freedom of the Press.

Detroit radical journalist Diane Bukowski, was convicted May 1 2009, on two felony charges stemming from her involvement as a reporter on the scene of a deadly police chase in Detroit on November 4, 2008. Michigan radicals from several Marxist organizations, including Democratic Socialists of America,Communist Party USA, Solidarity and especially the Workers World Party formed the committee to defend their comrade. Detroit City Councilwoman JoAnn Watson, Workers World Party leader David Sole, and Diane Bukowski

Other listed Committee endorsers included Hansen Clarke’s former boss John Conyers, Communist Party USA supporter John Woodford, Democratic Socialists of America members Phil Schloop and Al Benchich, Solidarity member Peter Solenberger and Workers World Party members David Sole, Sandra Hines, Cheryl LaBash, Bryan Pfeifer and WWP affiliated Detroit City Council member JoAnn Watson.

Clarke is also affiliated with Detroit’s Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center for Economic & Social Justice – named after the late pro-communist labor lawyer Maurice Sugar and affiliated with the Communist Party initiated National Lawyers Guild.

On November 18, 2010, the Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center presented “The Maurice Sugar Voice for Justice Award” to former Obama “Green Jobs Czar” Van Jones, “a Human Rights Activist and Green-Jobs Advocate,” at the United Way for Southeastern Michigan, 660 Woodward Ave.

Members of the Honorary Host Committee included
Congressmen Hansen Clarke; David Elsila, Retired Editor, UAW Solidarity Magazine and a DSA member; Bob King, President,

UAW International Vice President and a DSA supporter; Claudia Morcom

Retired Wayne County Circuit Court Judge and a DSA and Communist Party affiliate; Hasan Newash,

Palestine Office of Michigan and a Communist Party affiliate; Saundra Williams,

President, Metro Detroit AFL-CIO and a DSA affiliate and the Hon. JoAnn Watson, Detroit City Council and a long time Workers World Party affiliate.

YOUNG COMMUNIST LEAGUE LINKS TO OTHER PROGRESSIVE ORG’S

GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW-A 7 MINUTE INTERVIEW WITH TWO MINNESOTA COMMUNIST

Advertisements
31 Mar
SUPREME COURT IT’S YOUR CALL 

Will we remain a Republic or will we dive headlong into socialism/Obama Marxism, which is it

Nine Americans dressed in black robes will decide the fate of our country, do you think that is fair?
Do you think the whole future of our country,our children,our grandchildren should depend on the opinions of nine individuals with at least four of them political leftist?

We have three ultra Liberal females,two appointed by the Marxist and the usurper Obama, they will vote thumbs up to keep Obama Care intact.

Then we have a worn out Geritol sipping where’s my laxative,wicked witch from the East,ultra Liberal that probably has a hard time figuring out where in the Hell she is half the time..

Six males comes next, six males who I have no faith in what so ever except for one the rest are a coin toss.

On top of all this they are going to make “WE THE PEOPLE” wait on their decision until June, what’s with that anyway?

Patriots the Supreme court and it’s final decision will impact on the nation for decades, my suggestion is this “GET OFF OUR DEAD ASSES AND SEND LETTERS EXPRESSING OUR NON SUPPORT OF OBAMA CARE.

If you love your country,your families, you must write those letters, do it and do it often.  The fate of your country depends on YOU!!

SEND YOUR LETTERS TO

Justice ( or Chief Justice) 
(Justice’s (Full Name)
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543

Supreme court justices

Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
John Paul Stevens
Anthony Kennedy
Samuel Alito
Stephen Breyer
Sonia Sotomayor (Obama appointment)
Elena Kagan        (Obama appointment)

YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL “THE SUPREME COURT PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE” AND LEAVE COMMENTS –BUT A LETTER IS BETTER

FYI
Justices WILL BE taking A preliminary vote , THEN putting together opinions, A REMINDER TO ALL, justices having the freedom to change their minds until just before the rulings are revealed.

17 Dec
Conservatism, Where did it begin?

Before I get started I would first like to say that I personally believe that Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in my lifetime. There are myriads of reasons that people liked Ronald Reagan but for myself, one of the reasons was the sense and feeling of pride that he gave me as an American as I listened to his first inaugural speech while driving a truck on the highways in the state of Wyoming. I never had the privilege of meeting him yet I felt that I had as he spoke that day of the hopes, dreams, aspirations, and the resolve of “Heroes” (You and I) The American Citizens of the United States, and “YES!” I do believe my life was better because of the many things and changes he brought about.

What I find interesting is the allusion that is given out by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mike Gallagher, Mark Levin and other Conservative Radio Talk Show host that give the inference that Conservatism came about because of Ronald Reagan.

I would like to take a moment and say, that I have the utmost respect for those of whom I have named above, Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Hannity, Mr. Gallagher, and Mr. Levin as they are a most important weapon in the fight against Socialism in that, they bring to light many of the underhanded and despicable activities of the Socialist Elites that would otherwise go unnoticed or unreported by the mainstream media. These men and others like them are Patriots in my humble opinion and eyes and, if you were to ask me who I liked or appreciated the most I would have to say that it is Mr. Mark Levin as I myself enjoy and love the Constitution of The Untied States, I deeply appreciate and applaud his understanding and knowledge of this most precious and valuable document that by the way is not just written on parchment but is, (or it should be) written in our hearts and minds.

These men do their jobs day in and day out to bring us the information that is needed so that we can then do our part by, e-mailing, faxing, phone calls, and by flooding and shutting down switch boards and e-mail boxes so that “We The People” are and can be heard. Though I may not agree with them one hundred percent, I acknowledge and applaud their dedication, hard work, and their sacrifice to and for the cause of Liberty and Freedom in these very troubled times.

So, If I may continue.

Ronald Reagan did not define nor did he create Conservatism but, he did “Exemplify” in part what Conservatism is. I have even heard it said that he “Redefined” Conservatism which in actuality he did not. To “redefine” something causes or infers the content to be changed.

REDEFINE

1 : to define (as a concept) again : REFORMULATE *had to redefine their terms*
2 a : to reexamine or reevaluate especially with a view to change b : TRANSFORM 1c
–redefinition \(*)r*-*de-f*-*ni-sh*n\ noun

To even say that he “reestablished” Conservatism would infer a change of some kind and I honestly believe that this is not what he did because, True Conservatism does not need to be changed but rather adhered too. What President Reagan did was, bring Conservatism, Conservative Values, back to its rightful place, in the forefront, after it had been suppressed by Socialism for so many years.

Now, In President Reagan’s work of bringing Conservatism back to its rightful place, there was not a “redefining” of Conservatism but rather a “Resurgence” of and a “Re-commitment” by the people who held and believed in Conservative Values to Conservatism through the exhausting efforts and work of those many “Reagan Supporters”.

There was also the “New Commitment” of the younger generation who had grown up with the constant “Barrage” of Socialism from the Main Stream Media to the Left Wing Teachers. This Commitment by a younger generation to Conservatism should be a message to those of us who are older.

Now I made the statement or comment earlier that Ronald Reagan did not create Conservatism but that he merely brought it back to its rightful place so now I will elaborate.

I’ve said this before and I will say it again. I am a Born Again

CONSERVATISM

a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change
c : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

LIBERALISM

: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties : the principles and policies of a Liberal party

Again one must realize and grasp the fact that Liberalism is now in actuality “Socialism, Communism, Marxism” or any other title or philosophy that advocates that “The State is Supreme over the Masses”.

Conservatism and Liberalism first came into being in the Garden of Eden.

After God had created all things
He saw that His creation was “Good”. He made a garden placed Adam in the garden and Adam became a farmer. God tells Adam what he is to do and what he is “Not” to do:

Gen 2:15 And Jehovah God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest there of thou shalt surely die.

Here God establishes the institution of “Law and Order”. Adam is told what he is to do, he tills the ground and can eat from every tree except the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”. The adherence to these precepts that God has “Established and Instituted” is the birth of Conservatism.

Now God creates woman and God presents her to Adam *Gen. 2:22* and Adam names her Eve *Gen. 3:20*.

One day while alone in the garden Satan speaks to Eve through a serpent and tempts her to eat of the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”, but Eve “Knows” that this is wrong as she was taught by Adam what God had “Established and Instituted”.

Let’s break it down:

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?

Satan brings doubt to the authenticity of what God has “Established and Instituted”

Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat:
Gen 3:3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Eve knows what she has been told by Adam yet she “adds” to Gods Words by saying “neither shall ye touch it” which God never said to Adam. We now have doubt and the “entertaining” of a “new thought” not from God but rather from part of His creation.

Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.

We now see the birth of “Liberalism” through a “Lie” against the “Established Institution” of the Word of God. Satan no longer casts doubts but asserts “authority” over his Creator. He tells Eve that she is not really free, that she needs to cast off the “Old Traditional” way of thinking, the old “Established” way of life and think for herself. So she goes from “entertaining” to “accepting” the thoughts and lies.

BTW: For those opponents of God and His word who say that “Christians will force God on us”. Both Adam and Eve “Exercised” free will, Free Moral agency in choosing to be disobedient to God and His Word.

For those who ask, “If God were a loving God then why didn’t He stop them from making this mess that we now have?” It is the allowance of true Liberty and Freedom, the allowance to choose. Liberalism (Socialism) will suppress that right of choice make no mistake about it.

Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.
Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig-leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

I can make no defense for Eve. She knew what God had said yet she chose to believe a lie but, Sin and the fall of mankind did not come about through Eve but rather, it was through Adam, because it was Adam who had been given dominion over the earth and not Eve. Read Romans 5:12-21.

Conservatism, True Conservatism speaks and acknowledges the truth and then allows one to make up their mind

Liberalism (Socialism) uses lies, deception, and intimidation to coerce the desired outcome of tyrants.

To put it simply:

Conservatism: is a Godly principle given and handed to mankind from his Creator

Liberalism (Socialism): Is a deception that has been perpetrated and forced upon mankind by Satan

I do not speak of Republicans and Democrats, I do not speak of Political Parties but rather I speak of you and your heart, your conscience, your desire for real Liberty and Freedom. What is it that you want for this Nation? What is in your heart for this Nation?

Is it a heart that wants Socialistic servitude or a Conservation of Liberty and Freedom?

Don’t stay at home, VOTE. If you refuse to vote out of protest you give your vote to the enemies of this Nation.

Though I am not a Mormon nor do I believe in the doctrines or teachings of Mormonism, I cast my vote for Mitt Romney because I believe that he is the closest to being a Conservative than any of the others, but you must decide for yourself.

President Ronald Reagan said the following at his inauguration:

“On the eve of our struggle for independence a man who might have been one of the greatest among the Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, President of the Massachusetts Congress, said to his fellow Americans, “Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of…. On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important questions upon which rests the happiness and the liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves.”

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act worthy of ourselves, ready to do what must be done to ensure happiness and liberty for ourselves, our children and our children’s children.”

I also believe like President Reagan, that “WE” the Americans of today can act to ensure Liberty and Freedom for ourselves, our children, and our children’s children, but the question is

WILL WE?

Author-unknown

17 Dec

The GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW DEC 16TH-2011 -DEMOCRATS SCUM OF THE EARTH
MONOLOGUE FOR THE SHOW (NARRATIVE)

Socialist/liberals/Marxist/Progressives whatever you are going by today-make me laugh.
According to you and your Liberal friends,you are the only ones that have any sense any education,and everyone else are just toothless hillbillies.

Your way or the highway right? You know it all right? You attended some left wing College and received your four year dose of Socialism right? You absorb your news via Pravda West (ABC-CBS-NBC-CNN-PBS) right?

Social agenda-let’s review the liberal left’s social agenda
let’s see
1. ABORTION-
2. HATE AMERICA
3. TAX THE HELL OUT OF MOST WHO ACTUALLY EARN A LIVING
4. SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND-TO ALL THE LAY A BOUTS
5. GIVE THE COUNTRY AWAY TO ILLEGALS-AFTER ALL CAN YOU IMAGINE THE MILLIONS OF VOTES THIS 3RD WORLD TRASH WILL PROVIDE SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY-WOW
6. HOMOSEXUALITY A MAIN STAY IN LIBERALISM
Those who tend to migrate to the Liberal Left
Whiners
Abortionist
liars
cheats
those who do nothing but want it all -at the expense of those who do actually work
Socialist
Marxist
Communist
Pseudo intellectuals (who really could not find their back side with both hands)
Feminist
Blame America crowd
WE CONSERVATIVES MUST REMEMBER
LIBERALISM equals SOCIALISM equals COMMUNISM

10 Dec

Character Is Indivisible

“Honey, let’s turn Billy over to Dr. Spock, then you and I can take our copy of Dr. Leary’s book on mind-expanding mood-altering drugs, turn on, tune in and drop out, buy a couple of Suzukis and really get down on Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance during our ride up the coast to Esalen Institute where we’ll discuss a kind of spiritual/sensual synthesis between Aldous Huxley and Marshal Macluhan regarding the realization of our human potentialities at the cost of our occupational, parental, economic, marital and intellectual potentialities, offering ourselves as test cases for the new methodologies to experiment upon after we settle down to a comfortable life of cannabis cultivation when we turn our savings over to the charismatic visionary shaman who runs the commune….”

Prior to this insensate mass plunge into degradation in the name of “Self-Realization” beginning in the late 1960’s and enormously exacerbated from the outset by an equally insensate mass reliance on the various “therapeutic” corrosion’s of the fashionable pharmacopeia then pervading the culture, members in good standing of the American middle class had been, since the 1920s, turning for help in organizing and managing their increasingly diverse and hectic lives to a mushrooming tribe of guides and gurus, mostly possessing academic certification of one sort or another, with the aim—these modest husbands and wives,moms and dads—of polishing their skills and expanding their capabilities as the finest denizens of the middle class that money, effort, learning and practice could produce.

It was the “insensate” part of the process described above that did them in—and their enterprise and the country itself, not to mention their heritage and traditions—as a convenient and flexible new relativity replaced absolute standards of thought and behavior and the American national motto morphed from “out of many, one,” to “out of many, a hell of a lot of more, mutually incoherent and all of them out of synch with each other.”

And oh yes, I almost forgot—little Billy was never seen again, not at any rate as a recognizably normal child; whereas on the other hand his parents devolved into depraved and wanton malignant Narcissists.

Now with that somber note the long and complex part of this little essay is over, and all that remains to be touched on is:

(1) The power mongers who want to pick up the pieces and rule the land now invite us to believe in the principle of “compartmentalism,” that is, in the notion that I can be a reprehensible monster of personal behavior and yet portray myself plausibly as a perfectly decent public servant.

(2)  As we all partook of the brain’s Big Sleep of the last half century, it would be idle even to attempt to acquire, at this late date, the intellectual wherewithal necessary to subject politicians systematically to qualifying tests of character, mind and comportment.

(3)  We can, however, act forthrightly and assiduously upon a single criterion of judgment, and that is: CHARACTER IS INDIVISIBLE.  What this means in layman’s speak could not be easier to understand: The next time a candidate wishing to serve as Secretary of the Treasury is discovered not to have paid his income taxes, dismiss him from consideration instantly without for a nano-second considering the possibility, which he swears up and down is the truth, that he “forgot.”

Start there and repeat the process up and down the scale of nominated office-holders, and you will soon begin to hear the burp and gurgle of the country percolating back to health. Because whatever human weakness destroys and wastes, human strength can resurrect, given sufficient will-power and a surplus of passion.

OP ED BY: MR DON THOMPSON

Don Thompson writes exclusively for Conservatives Speak Out

LISTEN TO PAST GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW BY CLICKING ON PLAYER BELOW

6 Dec
Nancy Pelosi’s  Marxist/Communist connection

Like the president, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi does not have to go through a background investigation in order to get a security clearance.

This loophole in the law enables the president and members of Congress to automatically qualify for security clearances, even if they have controversial backgrounds and associations, by virtue of the fact that they get elected to high office in Washington, D.C.

In the case of Speaker Pelosi, who at the time was second in the line of succession to the presidency after the vice president, there was increasing concern about whether she could be trusted with national security secrets. But the concern not only involved her unsubstantiated charges against the CIA over what officials told her about the treatment of terrorists, but her close personal relationship with pro-Castro Rep. Barbara Lee and the “progressive” Hallinan family of San Francisco, once under scrutiny by the California Senate Fact-Finding Subcommittee on Un-American Activities for their pro-Soviet propaganda efforts. 

Pelosi used a May 22,2009  news conference to offer up other members of the House Democratic leadership as “human shields” to deflect questions from the press about the CIA controversy. They droned on about the liberal legislative agenda. 

At the very end of the news conference, as Pelosi was trying to leave the podium and had already issued an edict that she didn’t have anything more to say about the CIA matter, a reporter tried to ask a question about Rep. Steve King’s intention to introduce a resolution asking the House to suspend Pelosi’s security clearance until the controversy is resolved. The reporter asked, “And were you aware that Steve King is asking for your security clearance to be revoked?” But Pelosi walked away without commenting.

With the help of the mainstream media, Pelosi is obviously hoping that she can stonewall further inquiry. On a recent “Meet the Press,” on NBC,  Washington Post liberal columnist Eugene Robinson, a follower of the Democratic Party line, declared that he wasn’t sure that she was “in such terrible political danger” and that “People underestimate Nancy Pelosi sometimes as a politician.”

Pelosi the politician is clearly depending on the press to stop asking questions.

However, since Pelosi and other elected officials don’t have to go through background investigations, it is the job of the media to perform this function. In the case of Pelosi, it is long overdue.

written by Cliff Kincaid

GARY GATEHOUSE COMMENTS

Nancy Pelosi, so you want to open up a can of worms regarding Newt Gringrich?  Well lady go ahead and do it, don’t forget you might have props from the main stream (Pravda West Media) but lady you don’t control the internet, there is so much information on your communist/socialist activities, lady you are a poor excuse for a human being.

COMMUNIST BARBARA LEE (DEMOCRAT-CA)
 

You are a traitor to America, need I remind you that you once said “Illegals are the real heroes” you have been involved with intelligence leaks, siding with communist, rubbing elbows with fellow communist Barbara Lee-remember her Nancy?

Barbara Led (Democrat) began her political career in the California state legislature as a secret member of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a spin-off from the Communist Party. As a member of the staff of Rep. Ron Dellums, Lee was shown to have been collaborating with communist officials on the island of Grenada, according to documents captured after the liberation of that island nation. These revelations have not hurt Lee’s standing with Pelosi and other “progressives.” Indeed, Lee also served as the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Nancy you are a stealth COMMUNIST you support the communist cause in America–again Nancy go ahead and open that can of worms–

Do it and we will open up a much bigger can of good old American WOOP ASS!


6 Dec
WORDS OF TRUTH ABOUT AMERICA LIKE IT OR NOT…

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.
 
 “The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.

It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.

The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America .

Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.

The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”

LISTEN TO THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW-CLICK ON THE PLAYER