Archive | hannity RSS feed for this section
2 Jun
BLACK MARXIST ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER orders Florida to halt ongoing push to remove ineligible voters from rolls
Federal authorities are demanding that Florida halt its push to remove ineligible voters from the voter rolls.

In a move that comes just months before the state could play a pivotal role in the 2012 presidential election, the U.S. Department of Justice contends that the state is violating federal law in its effort to identify and remove ineligible voters.

The state’s effort has already come under fire from local election supervisors who belong to both political parties, as well as Democratic members of Congress and voting rights groups.

Chris Cate, a spokesman for the Florida Department of State, said state officials were still reviewing the letter, but hinted Florida may fight federal authorities.

“Bottom line is we are firmly committed to doing the right thing and preventing ineligible voters from being able to cast a ballot,” Cate said.

Florida, at the urging of Republican Gov. Rick Scott, began looking for non-U.S. citizens on its voter rolls last year. An initial search turned up as many as 182,000 registered voters who may not be U.S. citizens.

Earlier this year state officials sent to local election officials a much smaller list of more than 2,600 voters and asked supervisors to start the process to remove them from the rolls.

Supervisors, however, have loudly questioned the accuracy of the list, with one GOP supervisor going on Twitter to show the picture of a U.S. passport of one voter found on the list. Earlier this week two Democratic members of Congress held a press conference with a World War II veteran whose citizenship had been questioned.

Federal officials said that the procedures the state is using to identify non-U.S. citizens has not been reviewed to make sure they are not discriminatory. Florida must get approval for changes in voting procedures because five counties are still covered by the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

T. Christian Herren, chief of the voting section of the civil rights division, also said that removing voters from the rolls less than 90 days before a federal election also appears to violate federal law. Florida’s primary election is Aug. 14.

Herren’s letter gives Florida until June 6 to tell federal authorities whether they plan to halt the purge.

Voting rights groups who had called on the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene praised the decision.

“We commend the attorney general of the United States Eric Holder for ensuring that the right to vote, the fundamental pillar of our democracy is protected for all American citizens,” said Advancement Project co-director Penda Hair in a statement.

The intervention of the U.S. Department of Justice came the same day that Florida officials were trying to get another federal agency to help the state verify the citizenship status of thousands of voters.

Secretary of State Kent Detzner wants the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to let Florida have access to an immigration database maintained by the federal government.

“I hope you will understand the importance of making sure the vote of an eligible voter is not diminished by the vote of ineligible voter and provide my department the access it needs,” Detzner wrote to Secretary Janet Napolitano.

A Department of Homeland Security official said Thursday that the federal agency is aware of Florida’s request but that there a “number of legal and operational challenges” to granting the state access.

Detzner in his letter said that while Florida’s initial list was “credible and reliable” he acknowledged that his department’s ability to “validate a person’s legal status as up to date was limited.” The first list was drawn by comparing driver’s licenses to voter registration lists. The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles initially planned to double-check its information with the federal database but has since been told that is not permitted.

Even without access to the federal database Cate had said the state is likely to circulate additional names to election supervisors in the weeks ahead.

But some election supervisors are already saying that they will ignore any additional names given to them by the Florida Department of State.

“It’s illegal under federal law and I’m going to follow the law,” said Leon County Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho.



There you go Patriots-the Marxist Democrats and some Rino Republicans standing up for the right of illegals to vote how about that? But in America today most Americas will say who cares let them vote.

Throw the constitution out the window,trample on it crap on it do what ever you want, the CONSTITUTION DOES NOT MEAN A HILL OF BEANS TO MOST AMERICANS TODAY… Most have never read it and if they did they would not understand what it means.

PATRIOTS, we are at a crossroad either we fight the ignorance that undermines our freedoms, or we just roll over and tell those ignorant Americans it’s you game,it’s your country do with what you want…

6 Apr
The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal

Sheriff Joe expands Obama probe to Hillary supporters
Obama campaign, DNC accused of voter fraud in 2008

Based on interviews WND conducted with insiders in Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, Sheriff Joe Arpaio has decided to expand the scope of his law enforcement investigation into President Obama’s eligibility to include evidence and affidavits documenting alleged criminal activity by the Obama campaign in the 2008 Democratic Party primary race.

Hollywood film producer Bettina Viviano and Hollywood-based digital photographer Michele Thomas have given Arpaio’s investigators the names of dozens of Hillary Clinton supporters willing to come forward with evidence and affidavits. Among their claims is that the Clintons were the first to charge Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and that his birth certificate is a forgery.

Moreover, the Hillary supporters identified by Viviano and Thomas have argued that the pattern of questionable and possibly illegal activity suggests that the alleged act of producing forged birth certificate documentation for Obama may have been merely more of the same.

As WND reported, Viviano claims she heard Bill Clinton say that Obama is not eligible to be president.

‘Not a partisan investigation’

Arpaio has insisted his investigation into Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is not a partisan investigation. It was triggered, he noted, by a petition presented to him in August signed by some 250 members of the Surprise Tea Party in Surprise, Ariz.

“I’m just doing what I took an oath of office to do – enforce the law,” Arpaio told a combined meeting of the Surprise Tea Party and the Sun City West Tea Party on Saturday attended by over 1,100 people. “I report to the people. I’m not accusing the president of any crime. We used no taxpayer money, and I listen to the complaints brought to me. I don’t throw citizen complaints in the wastebasket.”

Arpaio said he began the investigation with the goal of proving Obama’s birth certificate legitimate.

“I feel very strongly as the constitutional, chief law enforcement officer for this county,” Arpaio told the Tea Party audience. “I wanted to do everything to clear the president of the United States. I wanted to be the guy who stood up here and said that birth certificate is legitimate – leave the president alone. But it didn’t work out that way.”

As WND reported, at a press conference March 1 in Phoenix, Arpaio announced his investigators have probable cause to believe Obama’s birth certificate and his Selective Service Registration form are forgeries.

“The last I heard, if you forged documents, that’s a violation of law,” he quipped to the tea party audience. “If you did it, you’d be in trouble big time.”

Chaos in 2008

Viviano, working with screenplay writer and director Gigi Gaston, produced in 2008 a documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced,” based on interviews from participants in Democratic Party primary caucuses. They accuse the Obama administration of illegitimate and illegal acts, including threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents and busing in voters in exchange for meals.

“This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign,” Gaston and Viviano write on the “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008 website, which features a 40-minute preview of the documentary.

“We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign ‘Chicago Machine’ dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of ‘change’ from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote.”

Arpaio’s investigation has already uncovered evidence of intimidation by Obama supporters in an attempt to suppress media coverage of the birth certificate and eligibility issues.

A memo published by the Hillary for President campaign March 4, 2008, noted the following specific accusations of irregularities and voter intimidation allegedly committed by the Obama campaign:

    Irregularities: Prematurely taking precinct convention packets by the Obama campaign;

    Voter intimidation: Lockout of Clinton caucus goers by the Obama campaign; and

    Obama supporters filling out precinct convention sign-in sheets during the day and submitting them as completed vote totals at caucuses, a practice explicitly forbidden by Democratic Party rules.

The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal,” reflecting “a wanton disregard for the caucus process.”

Hillary: continuing threat to Obama

In the 2010 mid-term elections, the blue-collar voters who supported Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign abandoned the Democratic Party led by Obama.

A Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll after the November 2010 elections showed Democrats’ support from white, non-college-educated male voters dropped 12 percent from 2008, with only 29 percent of blue-collar men supporting the Democrats in 2010, down from 41 percent in 2008, as reported by

Last November, prominent Democratic pollsters Patrick Caddell and Douglas Schoen, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggesting Obama should abandon his candidacy for re-election, stepping aside for “the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

Conceding that even with an all-time-low job approval rating and even worse ratings on handling the economy, Obama could “eke out” a victory in November 2012, Caddell and Schoen argued that the type of campaign required for Obama’s “political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern – not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.”

The PUMA P.A.C. that emerged to oppose Obama and support Hillary in 2008 remains in existence. It describes itself as “a burgeoning group of bloggers, writers and citizens who are joining together to fight back against the corrupt leadership of the DNC, their ‘chosen’ candidate and the mainstream media that enables them.”

In 2008, Obama won over women voters, with 56 percent voting for him, versus 49 percent of men, according to Woman’s Vote Watch at Rutgers University.

The Obama campaign appears to have gained at least a temporary advantage among women, after charging that GOP presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, are “hostile to women” for their stand on contraceptives, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll released this week.

According to the poll, Obama’s biggest advantage rests with women under 50, with six in 10 supporting him. Romney’s support in that demographic dropped to 30 percent, giving Obama a 2-to-1 advantage.

Obama administration senior officials confirmed Monday that Clinton will not campaign for Obama to avoid making her position as secretary of state appear political, according to the Huffington Post.

Clinton previously announced she plans to leave the State Department at the end of Obama’s current term.

Written by by Jerome R. Corsi-World Net Daily


Out of sight out of mind ?

 Could have the Obama regime given or promised Hillary a top tier job if he was elected to the White House?  Secretary of State is a prestigious position, and Obama has succeeded in keeping Hillary out of the country since almost day one of his appointing her as Secretary of State.

So far we have more than enough uncovered information of Obama to warrant at least a Congressional investigation, but as of this writing the Republican leadership is silent.

We have those in the media who swear they are going to vett the president and expose him for what he really is, as of yet not word has been spoken on the airways via radio or television about Sheriff Joe Arpaio findings NOT ONE DAMN WORD.

So much for the vetting that was going to take place.  Just more smoke being blown up America’s ass.. 


29 Mar
The Soldier stood and faced God,
Which must always come to pass.
He hoped his shoes were shining,
Just as brightly as his brass..
‘Step forward now,Soldier ,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?’
The soldier squared his shoulders and said,
‘No, Lord, I guess I ain’t.
Because those of us who carry guns,
 Can’t always be a saint.
I’ve had to work most Sundays,
And at times my talk was tough.
And sometimes I’ve been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny,
That wasn’t mine to keep…
Though I worked a lot of overtime,
When the bills got just too steep.
And I never passed a cry for help,
Though at times I shook with fear..
And sometimes, God, forgive me,
I’ve wept unmanly tears.
I know I don’t deserve a place,
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around,
Except to calm their fears
If you’ve a place for me here, Lord,
It needn’t be so grand.
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don’t, I’ll understand.
There was a silence all around the throne,
Where the saints had often trod.
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
‘Step forward now, you Soldier,
You’ve borne your burdens well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven’s streets,
You’ve done your time in Hell.’
Author Unknown~
It’s the Soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us the freedom of the press.
It’s the Soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us the freedom of speech.
It’s the Soldier, not the politicians
That ensures our right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness..
It’s the Soldier who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag.
Patriots,If it weren’t for the United States military,
there would be NO United States of America .
Patriots,less than 1%of our entire population fight for us, less than 1% of the American population wear the uniforms of our military services.  Yet, there is a fairly large population of Americans that would not serve under any circumstance, you see they have been told it is their RIGHT to refuse service!
United States military are serving 3-4-5 combat tours in the middle east they are tired,broken, they have families too, they miss their girlfriends,boyfriends, their wives, their children, their country, yet they fight on.  
Our military is the best educated,motivated,military in the world and we should give them praise ever time that chance presents itself.!

24 Mar










17 Dec
Conservatism, Where did it begin?

Before I get started I would first like to say that I personally believe that Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in my lifetime. There are myriads of reasons that people liked Ronald Reagan but for myself, one of the reasons was the sense and feeling of pride that he gave me as an American as I listened to his first inaugural speech while driving a truck on the highways in the state of Wyoming. I never had the privilege of meeting him yet I felt that I had as he spoke that day of the hopes, dreams, aspirations, and the resolve of “Heroes” (You and I) The American Citizens of the United States, and “YES!” I do believe my life was better because of the many things and changes he brought about.

What I find interesting is the allusion that is given out by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mike Gallagher, Mark Levin and other Conservative Radio Talk Show host that give the inference that Conservatism came about because of Ronald Reagan.

I would like to take a moment and say, that I have the utmost respect for those of whom I have named above, Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Hannity, Mr. Gallagher, and Mr. Levin as they are a most important weapon in the fight against Socialism in that, they bring to light many of the underhanded and despicable activities of the Socialist Elites that would otherwise go unnoticed or unreported by the mainstream media. These men and others like them are Patriots in my humble opinion and eyes and, if you were to ask me who I liked or appreciated the most I would have to say that it is Mr. Mark Levin as I myself enjoy and love the Constitution of The Untied States, I deeply appreciate and applaud his understanding and knowledge of this most precious and valuable document that by the way is not just written on parchment but is, (or it should be) written in our hearts and minds.

These men do their jobs day in and day out to bring us the information that is needed so that we can then do our part by, e-mailing, faxing, phone calls, and by flooding and shutting down switch boards and e-mail boxes so that “We The People” are and can be heard. Though I may not agree with them one hundred percent, I acknowledge and applaud their dedication, hard work, and their sacrifice to and for the cause of Liberty and Freedom in these very troubled times.

So, If I may continue.

Ronald Reagan did not define nor did he create Conservatism but, he did “Exemplify” in part what Conservatism is. I have even heard it said that he “Redefined” Conservatism which in actuality he did not. To “redefine” something causes or infers the content to be changed.


1 : to define (as a concept) again : REFORMULATE *had to redefine their terms*
2 a : to reexamine or reevaluate especially with a view to change b : TRANSFORM 1c
–redefinition \(*)r*-*de-f*-*ni-sh*n\ noun

To even say that he “reestablished” Conservatism would infer a change of some kind and I honestly believe that this is not what he did because, True Conservatism does not need to be changed but rather adhered too. What President Reagan did was, bring Conservatism, Conservative Values, back to its rightful place, in the forefront, after it had been suppressed by Socialism for so many years.

Now, In President Reagan’s work of bringing Conservatism back to its rightful place, there was not a “redefining” of Conservatism but rather a “Resurgence” of and a “Re-commitment” by the people who held and believed in Conservative Values to Conservatism through the exhausting efforts and work of those many “Reagan Supporters”.

There was also the “New Commitment” of the younger generation who had grown up with the constant “Barrage” of Socialism from the Main Stream Media to the Left Wing Teachers. This Commitment by a younger generation to Conservatism should be a message to those of us who are older.

Now I made the statement or comment earlier that Ronald Reagan did not create Conservatism but that he merely brought it back to its rightful place so now I will elaborate.

I’ve said this before and I will say it again. I am a Born Again


a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change
c : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change


: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties : the principles and policies of a Liberal party

Again one must realize and grasp the fact that Liberalism is now in actuality “Socialism, Communism, Marxism” or any other title or philosophy that advocates that “The State is Supreme over the Masses”.

Conservatism and Liberalism first came into being in the Garden of Eden.

After God had created all things
He saw that His creation was “Good”. He made a garden placed Adam in the garden and Adam became a farmer. God tells Adam what he is to do and what he is “Not” to do:

Gen 2:15 And Jehovah God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest there of thou shalt surely die.

Here God establishes the institution of “Law and Order”. Adam is told what he is to do, he tills the ground and can eat from every tree except the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”. The adherence to these precepts that God has “Established and Instituted” is the birth of Conservatism.

Now God creates woman and God presents her to Adam *Gen. 2:22* and Adam names her Eve *Gen. 3:20*.

One day while alone in the garden Satan speaks to Eve through a serpent and tempts her to eat of the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”, but Eve “Knows” that this is wrong as she was taught by Adam what God had “Established and Instituted”.

Let’s break it down:

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?

Satan brings doubt to the authenticity of what God has “Established and Instituted”

Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat:
Gen 3:3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Eve knows what she has been told by Adam yet she “adds” to Gods Words by saying “neither shall ye touch it” which God never said to Adam. We now have doubt and the “entertaining” of a “new thought” not from God but rather from part of His creation.

Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.

We now see the birth of “Liberalism” through a “Lie” against the “Established Institution” of the Word of God. Satan no longer casts doubts but asserts “authority” over his Creator. He tells Eve that she is not really free, that she needs to cast off the “Old Traditional” way of thinking, the old “Established” way of life and think for herself. So she goes from “entertaining” to “accepting” the thoughts and lies.

BTW: For those opponents of God and His word who say that “Christians will force God on us”. Both Adam and Eve “Exercised” free will, Free Moral agency in choosing to be disobedient to God and His Word.

For those who ask, “If God were a loving God then why didn’t He stop them from making this mess that we now have?” It is the allowance of true Liberty and Freedom, the allowance to choose. Liberalism (Socialism) will suppress that right of choice make no mistake about it.

Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.
Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig-leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

I can make no defense for Eve. She knew what God had said yet she chose to believe a lie but, Sin and the fall of mankind did not come about through Eve but rather, it was through Adam, because it was Adam who had been given dominion over the earth and not Eve. Read Romans 5:12-21.

Conservatism, True Conservatism speaks and acknowledges the truth and then allows one to make up their mind

Liberalism (Socialism) uses lies, deception, and intimidation to coerce the desired outcome of tyrants.

To put it simply:

Conservatism: is a Godly principle given and handed to mankind from his Creator

Liberalism (Socialism): Is a deception that has been perpetrated and forced upon mankind by Satan

I do not speak of Republicans and Democrats, I do not speak of Political Parties but rather I speak of you and your heart, your conscience, your desire for real Liberty and Freedom. What is it that you want for this Nation? What is in your heart for this Nation?

Is it a heart that wants Socialistic servitude or a Conservation of Liberty and Freedom?

Don’t stay at home, VOTE. If you refuse to vote out of protest you give your vote to the enemies of this Nation.

Though I am not a Mormon nor do I believe in the doctrines or teachings of Mormonism, I cast my vote for Mitt Romney because I believe that he is the closest to being a Conservative than any of the others, but you must decide for yourself.

President Ronald Reagan said the following at his inauguration:

“On the eve of our struggle for independence a man who might have been one of the greatest among the Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, President of the Massachusetts Congress, said to his fellow Americans, “Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of…. On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important questions upon which rests the happiness and the liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves.”

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act worthy of ourselves, ready to do what must be done to ensure happiness and liberty for ourselves, our children and our children’s children.”

I also believe like President Reagan, that “WE” the Americans of today can act to ensure Liberty and Freedom for ourselves, our children, and our children’s children, but the question is