Archive | hillary clinton RSS feed for this section
6 Apr
The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal

Sheriff Joe expands Obama probe to Hillary supporters
Obama campaign, DNC accused of voter fraud in 2008

Based on interviews WND conducted with insiders in Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, Sheriff Joe Arpaio has decided to expand the scope of his law enforcement investigation into President Obama’s eligibility to include evidence and affidavits documenting alleged criminal activity by the Obama campaign in the 2008 Democratic Party primary race.

Hollywood film producer Bettina Viviano and Hollywood-based digital photographer Michele Thomas have given Arpaio’s investigators the names of dozens of Hillary Clinton supporters willing to come forward with evidence and affidavits. Among their claims is that the Clintons were the first to charge Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and that his birth certificate is a forgery.

Moreover, the Hillary supporters identified by Viviano and Thomas have argued that the pattern of questionable and possibly illegal activity suggests that the alleged act of producing forged birth certificate documentation for Obama may have been merely more of the same.

As WND reported, Viviano claims she heard Bill Clinton say that Obama is not eligible to be president.

‘Not a partisan investigation’

Arpaio has insisted his investigation into Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is not a partisan investigation. It was triggered, he noted, by a petition presented to him in August signed by some 250 members of the Surprise Tea Party in Surprise, Ariz.

“I’m just doing what I took an oath of office to do – enforce the law,” Arpaio told a combined meeting of the Surprise Tea Party and the Sun City West Tea Party on Saturday attended by over 1,100 people. “I report to the people. I’m not accusing the president of any crime. We used no taxpayer money, and I listen to the complaints brought to me. I don’t throw citizen complaints in the wastebasket.”

Arpaio said he began the investigation with the goal of proving Obama’s birth certificate legitimate.

“I feel very strongly as the constitutional, chief law enforcement officer for this county,” Arpaio told the Tea Party audience. “I wanted to do everything to clear the president of the United States. I wanted to be the guy who stood up here and said that birth certificate is legitimate – leave the president alone. But it didn’t work out that way.”

As WND reported, at a press conference March 1 in Phoenix, Arpaio announced his investigators have probable cause to believe Obama’s birth certificate and his Selective Service Registration form are forgeries.

“The last I heard, if you forged documents, that’s a violation of law,” he quipped to the tea party audience. “If you did it, you’d be in trouble big time.”

Chaos in 2008

Viviano, working with screenplay writer and director Gigi Gaston, produced in 2008 a documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced,” based on interviews from participants in Democratic Party primary caucuses. They accuse the Obama administration of illegitimate and illegal acts, including threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents and busing in voters in exchange for meals.

“This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign,” Gaston and Viviano write on the “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008 website, which features a 40-minute preview of the documentary.

“We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign ‘Chicago Machine’ dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of ‘change’ from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote.”

Arpaio’s investigation has already uncovered evidence of intimidation by Obama supporters in an attempt to suppress media coverage of the birth certificate and eligibility issues.

A memo published by the Hillary for President campaign March 4, 2008, noted the following specific accusations of irregularities and voter intimidation allegedly committed by the Obama campaign:

    Irregularities: Prematurely taking precinct convention packets by the Obama campaign;

    Voter intimidation: Lockout of Clinton caucus goers by the Obama campaign; and

    Obama supporters filling out precinct convention sign-in sheets during the day and submitting them as completed vote totals at caucuses, a practice explicitly forbidden by Democratic Party rules.

The Clinton memo characterized the Obama campaign caucus practices as “undemocratic, probably illegal,” reflecting “a wanton disregard for the caucus process.”

Hillary: continuing threat to Obama

In the 2010 mid-term elections, the blue-collar voters who supported Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign abandoned the Democratic Party led by Obama.

A Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll after the November 2010 elections showed Democrats’ support from white, non-college-educated male voters dropped 12 percent from 2008, with only 29 percent of blue-collar men supporting the Democrats in 2010, down from 41 percent in 2008, as reported by

Last November, prominent Democratic pollsters Patrick Caddell and Douglas Schoen, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggesting Obama should abandon his candidacy for re-election, stepping aside for “the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

Conceding that even with an all-time-low job approval rating and even worse ratings on handling the economy, Obama could “eke out” a victory in November 2012, Caddell and Schoen argued that the type of campaign required for Obama’s “political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern – not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.”

The PUMA P.A.C. that emerged to oppose Obama and support Hillary in 2008 remains in existence. It describes itself as “a burgeoning group of bloggers, writers and citizens who are joining together to fight back against the corrupt leadership of the DNC, their ‘chosen’ candidate and the mainstream media that enables them.”

In 2008, Obama won over women voters, with 56 percent voting for him, versus 49 percent of men, according to Woman’s Vote Watch at Rutgers University.

The Obama campaign appears to have gained at least a temporary advantage among women, after charging that GOP presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, are “hostile to women” for their stand on contraceptives, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll released this week.

According to the poll, Obama’s biggest advantage rests with women under 50, with six in 10 supporting him. Romney’s support in that demographic dropped to 30 percent, giving Obama a 2-to-1 advantage.

Obama administration senior officials confirmed Monday that Clinton will not campaign for Obama to avoid making her position as secretary of state appear political, according to the Huffington Post.

Clinton previously announced she plans to leave the State Department at the end of Obama’s current term.

Written by by Jerome R. Corsi-World Net Daily


Out of sight out of mind ?

 Could have the Obama regime given or promised Hillary a top tier job if he was elected to the White House?  Secretary of State is a prestigious position, and Obama has succeeded in keeping Hillary out of the country since almost day one of his appointing her as Secretary of State.

So far we have more than enough uncovered information of Obama to warrant at least a Congressional investigation, but as of this writing the Republican leadership is silent.

We have those in the media who swear they are going to vett the president and expose him for what he really is, as of yet not word has been spoken on the airways via radio or television about Sheriff Joe Arpaio findings NOT ONE DAMN WORD.

So much for the vetting that was going to take place.  Just more smoke being blown up America’s ass.. 



25 Dec


1880. The National Council of Education (NCE) was established. An exclusive forum for leaders in position of influence and power, in included John Dewey, G. Stanley Hall, Charles Eliot and James Russell. Here they would discuss progressive ideas, blend psychology and evolutionary ‘science’ into a new vision of human progress, and lay the foundation for America’s planned transformation. B-43 Samuel Blumenfeld described their aims in NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education:

    “…to create the kinds of schools and curricula which would produce, if not perfect men, at least the kinds of men and women the educators considered desirable.

           “The most important idea that would influence the educators was that of evolution…. It was all ‘matter in motion’ and it fit in very well with the dialectical materialism of the atheist Marxists who were now able to link man’s physical evolution with his social evolution.”

1912. The NEA saw sex education as a useful tool in their values-changing process.

1933. Rockefeller Foundation president Matt Mason told trustees that “The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control…. the control of human behavior. (Together with the Carnegie Institute, it was also funding eugenics research

1948. The NEA… produced a set of international guidelines called Education for International Understanding in American Schools – Suggestions and Recommendations. It included this statement:

1948. B.F. Skinner (1972 Humanist of the Year) described a society in which children are reared by the State.

“The idea has become established that the preservation of international peace and order may require that force be used to compel a nation to conduct its affairs within the framework of an established world system. The most modern expression of this doctrine of collective security is in the United Nations Charter… Many persons believe that enduring peace cannot be achieved so long as the nation-state system continues as at present constituted. It is a system of international anarchy.”

1948The NEA was funded in part by the Carnegie Corporation.

1956. Former teacher, Communist and Union organizer, Dr. Bella Dodd states, “…the Communist party whenever possible wanted to use the Teacher’s Union for political purposes but the party had a definite interest in education also. The Communists in the Teachers’ Union were for progressive education. We were its most vocal and enthusiastic supporters…. Most of the programs we advocated, the NEA followed the next year or so.”

1962. An editorial in the Chicago Sun-Times states: “…real control over the nation’s children is being shifted rapidly to the NEA. That organization has about completed the job of cartelizing public schools education under … an organization known as the National Council for Accreditation of Teachers Education, an agency whose governing council is tightly NEA controlled. … The manner in which the NEA is usurping parental prerogatives… is…very simple: control the education and hiring of teachers.”

1967. Working with the educational establishment, Carl Rogers (1964 Humanist of the Year) wrote a book called “A Plan for Self-Directed Change in an Educational System:” “…the goal of education must be to develop individuals who are open to change… The goal of education must be to develop a society in which people can live more comfortably with change than with rigidity.”

 1969. In Schools without Failure, psychiatrist William Glasser wrote: “We have to let students know there are no right answers… and may alternatives to certainty and right answer.”

1970. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), the curriculum arm of the NEA, published To Nurture Humaneness: Commitment for the ’70’s [NEA, 1970). The visionary statements of its authors are coming true in our times:

       “The old order is passing…. The controls of the past were sacred…. Social controls cannot be left to blind chance and unplanned change — usually attributed to God. Man must be the builder of new forms of social organizations…. Here education must play a stellar role.” (Dan W. Dodson, Professor of Educational Sociology at N. Y. University)

      “The school will need to be supplemented by neighborhood family centers which provide infant care and developmental activity…. Education may well begin at birth in cooperative family centers. (Francis Chase, Professor Emeritus of the University of Chicago)

      “Many daily decisions and value judgments now made by the individual will soon be made for him… How to plan for one’s children’s education will be partially taken out of his hands. (John Loughary, Professor of Education at the University of Oregon.”

 Chester Pierce, Professor of Education and Psychiatry at Harvard tells the Association for Childhood Education International in Denver that “every child in American entering schools at the age of five is insane because he comes to schools with certain allegiances toward our founding father, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity…

1972. NEA president Catherine Barrett said, “We are the biggest potential political striking force in this country, and we are determined to control the direction of education.”

       “Those who rose highest in the public schools establishment and the NEA were those most strongly committed to secularism and statism,” wrote Blumenfeld. Those two complementary philosophies fueled the vision of NEA leaders who sought an utopian world, freed from Biblical constraints and ruled by humanist politicians and taught by progressive educators. Parental rights and religious freedom would be swallowed up by the surpassing rights and rules of the greater community — the controlled collective.

1981. In his book, All Our Children Learning, Dr. Benjamin Bloom (called “the father of Outcome-Based Education) wrote that “the purpose of education and the schools is to change the thoughts, feelings and actions of students.”

1992 Marc Tucker, director of the National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE — began as an agency within the Carnegie Foundation) and the master-mind behind this partnership between schools and labor, proposed “breaking the current system, root and branch.” He said, “Our objective will require a change in the prevailing culture–the attitudes, values, norms, and accepted ways of doing things.”

In a post election letter to Hillary Clinton,  wrote, “What is essential . . . is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one’s skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same for everyone…a system of unending skill development that begins in the home and continues through school, post-secondary education and the workplace.”

Patriots, and we wonder how our country got in the mess it’s in, our public school system under the control of the National Education Association ( a strong arm education union that is part of the Democrat socialist/Marxist/communist/progressive movement) is NOT teaching our children, they are indoctrinating them .

Look no further than the OCCUPIER movement, a prime example of the success the NEA and the Democrats Socialist have enjoyed…

Patriots, our country our children,our families our christian religion is under attack, our morals,our ethics are under attack,our constitution, our history, are under attack by the National Education Association and the Democrat/socialist/Marxist/communist/progressive left…