Archive | liberal RSS feed for this section
4 Mar


The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.



SANDRA FLUKE the 30-year-old student who stirred the debate is no novice to the political arena.


Fluke has a long history of feminist advocacy: The Washington Post reported Fluke entered Georgetown Law well aware that the school’s insurance plan did not cover contraception, only to spend the next three years lobbying the school to change its policy.


“Fluke attended Cornell University from 1999-2003, where she received a B.S. in Policy Analysis & Management and Feminist, Gender, Sexuality Studies.


While at Cornell, Fluke’s organized actives centered around the far-left feminist and gender equity movements. Fluke participated in rallies supporting abortion, protests against war in Iraq and efforts to recruit other women’s’ rights activists to campus.”

During that period, she gained experience engaging in disputes concerning abortion with religious organizations.

“We feel that the information [Cornell Coalition for Life] has out is reactionary, and it’s not based on giving people information about their choices, but manipulating their emotions,” Fluke, then the treasurer of Students Acting for Gender Equality (SAGE), told The Cornell Daily Sun during a protest of a pro-life display at the school’s Ho Plaza. “We want to show people they should have a choice about a decision this important and whatever choice they make, we’ll support it,” she said.

————————————————–

GATEHOUSE COMMENTS
Reproductive rights-Planned Parenthood-abortion-free birth control-gender equity



These are all planks of the Left (Democrat Party) they all deal with sex directly or indirectly, they all deal with women issues,homosexual issues and the left’s agenda to wrap other issues such as health care insurance,religious rights,taxes, into one big package one big assault on morals,religion,taxpayers,the family all based on WOMEN’S RIGHTS it’s my body I can do with what I want (but you gotta pay for it).


Ladies and Gentlemen, you folks with common sense, Sandra Fluke is not the issue, it is what she represents, and that being the never ending assault by the left on all that is good in America. It is a left wing agenda that has but one outcome as far as they are concerned that being     SOCIALISM.  Womb to Tomb government control of each and every one of us…


DEMOCRATS put the contraception issue into play when George Stepanonsense brought this planted “contraception” crap up at the January Republican Debate. This was and is part of the Obama plan,get the female vote, last time it was change a word that most women can relate to and it worked. Now it is reproductive rights  another issue most women can relate to one way or another. 


Women of America you that have common sense,wake up the left is using you to further their SOCIALIST AGENDA

The question must be asked “who is responsible for the mess our country is in”

How did we as a nation elect a Marxist to the office of President of the United States


Nobody held a gun to our head


Nobody threatened our families

WAKE UP AMERICA IT IS TIME TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK FROM THE MARXIST LEFT
OBAMA NATIONAL POLICE FORCE
(ENFORCERS OF HIS MARXIST AGENDA)
Advertisements
9 Jan
THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW –FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE WE WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU

DEMOCRAT SOCIALIST FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE WE WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU


OBAMA WILL BE YOUR DADDY
YOUR MOTHER
YOUR CONFESSOR
YOUR ADVISER
YOUR UNDERTAKER
YOUR DOCTOR
YOUR PROVIDER FOR ALL YOUR NEEDS


JUST SIGN YOUR LIFE OVER TO OBAMA AND HIS SOCIALIST/MARXIST DEMOCRAT PARTY
THEY UNDERSTAND
THEY KNOW YOU JUST WANT TO LIVE YOUR LIFE WITHOUT ANY RESPONSIBILITY


AFTER ALL OBAMA AND HIS MINIONS KNOW BEST!

YOU CAN ACCESS ALL THE MOST CURRENT GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOWS BY CLICKING ON THE PLAYER BELOW

2 Jan
My instinct is to speak reasonably with people, especially those who disagree with me.

 I empathize with everybody who undertakes the passion-rousing quest I think of as the never-ending (because chronology persists and circumstances change) search for what is best for us all.

But the Liberals with their moral certitude and giddy pretension to intellectual probity refuse to clasp my open hand.  They assume irremediably that we Conservatives are jackbooted zealots who want to waste civilization in an operatic (Wagnerian, of course) orgy of butchering blood-lust, and that we consequently deserve to be dismissed contemptuously—and also snidely—from their circle-jerk of self-appointed philosopher-kings. 

Well on this day I dismiss them, and with a lot more contempt than I can adequately express.  I also hereby renounce all further effort to reason with these people as though they were actually well-disposed brokers of the intellect and culture. What they are is thought-police, tyrannical oligarchs, micromanaging nannies and unprincipled polemicists, and from now on I am going to deal with them as they deserve. Ich kann nicht anders.

 If any say I’m not being fair to “honest” Liberals who don’t bear a likeness to the portrait I have limned, my reply is: let them move away from what their creed has metamorphosed into and publicly denounce its pathology.  Christopher Hitchens did this, and they can follow suit.

Oped written exclusively for Conservatives Speak Out Blog
by:Mr Don Thompson

20 Dec
Shocker: Chris Matthews Exposed By “Hardball” Guest for Being a Partisan

Chris Matthews, the bombastic liberal host of Hardball on MSNBC, got a dose of his own medicine last week when he interviewed Iowa talk-show host Simon Conway about the upcoming Iowa caucuses.

Matthews started off by introducing Conway and asking him what the feeling was in Iowa for the candidates. But before talking about the caucuses, Conway chose to expose Matthews’ political leanings.

Conway: First of all it’s always a pleasure to welcome a Democrat to the Simon Conway show, Chris, so you’re very welcome.

Matthews: What does that mean? Are we all giving our party labels out here? Is that, are you giving me yours? Or you don’t want to give it?

 You want to give me one but don’t give yourself one.

 That’s not fair.

Conway:  Chris, I’m not a Republican, never have been, and never will be. I keep…

Matthews:  So you give labels but you don’t assign one to yourself. That’s very clever.

Conway: Well there isn’t one. I just want to make sure that we’re starting with some honesty. You’re clearly working for the re-election for Barack Obama…

Matthews:  I just want to make sure…

Conway: Well…hey!

Matthews: This is going to go very long here if you play this game of assigning, what is your political voting record then? How do you vote last time?

Conway answered that he voted for McCain while holding his nose, which isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement for the GOP and doesn’t necessarily make him a Republican.

Matthews was clearly surprised by Conway’s comments, and was not happy. It certainly should come as no surprise to anyone that Matthews is using his shows and his influence to help Obama get re-elected, something he never denied.

Conway managed to do what few of Matthews guests have been able to do — get under his skin and put him on the defensive, if only momentarily, and make him look like a child who was going to pick up all his toys and go home if he didn’t get his way.

The conversation did eventually turn to what was happening politically in Iowa with the GOP presidential field, but by then the damage was already done — to Matthews.

Written by:
———————–
Gary Gatehouse comments

We who have common sense know Chris Matthews is nothing more than a Democrat Socialist hack, just another Socialist that thinks his opinions are the right and correct opinions and those of us who are conservative we are just toothless hillbillies. Chris the bottom line here is this

YOU ARE A JACKASS AND YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK
ALL YOU SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS REMEMBER THIS

YOU ARE LISTENING TO “THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW WITH HOST GARY GATEHOUSE”

17 Dec
Conservatism, Where did it begin?

Before I get started I would first like to say that I personally believe that Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in my lifetime. There are myriads of reasons that people liked Ronald Reagan but for myself, one of the reasons was the sense and feeling of pride that he gave me as an American as I listened to his first inaugural speech while driving a truck on the highways in the state of Wyoming. I never had the privilege of meeting him yet I felt that I had as he spoke that day of the hopes, dreams, aspirations, and the resolve of “Heroes” (You and I) The American Citizens of the United States, and “YES!” I do believe my life was better because of the many things and changes he brought about.

What I find interesting is the allusion that is given out by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mike Gallagher, Mark Levin and other Conservative Radio Talk Show host that give the inference that Conservatism came about because of Ronald Reagan.

I would like to take a moment and say, that I have the utmost respect for those of whom I have named above, Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Hannity, Mr. Gallagher, and Mr. Levin as they are a most important weapon in the fight against Socialism in that, they bring to light many of the underhanded and despicable activities of the Socialist Elites that would otherwise go unnoticed or unreported by the mainstream media. These men and others like them are Patriots in my humble opinion and eyes and, if you were to ask me who I liked or appreciated the most I would have to say that it is Mr. Mark Levin as I myself enjoy and love the Constitution of The Untied States, I deeply appreciate and applaud his understanding and knowledge of this most precious and valuable document that by the way is not just written on parchment but is, (or it should be) written in our hearts and minds.

These men do their jobs day in and day out to bring us the information that is needed so that we can then do our part by, e-mailing, faxing, phone calls, and by flooding and shutting down switch boards and e-mail boxes so that “We The People” are and can be heard. Though I may not agree with them one hundred percent, I acknowledge and applaud their dedication, hard work, and their sacrifice to and for the cause of Liberty and Freedom in these very troubled times.

So, If I may continue.

Ronald Reagan did not define nor did he create Conservatism but, he did “Exemplify” in part what Conservatism is. I have even heard it said that he “Redefined” Conservatism which in actuality he did not. To “redefine” something causes or infers the content to be changed.

REDEFINE

1 : to define (as a concept) again : REFORMULATE *had to redefine their terms*
2 a : to reexamine or reevaluate especially with a view to change b : TRANSFORM 1c
–redefinition \(*)r*-*de-f*-*ni-sh*n\ noun

To even say that he “reestablished” Conservatism would infer a change of some kind and I honestly believe that this is not what he did because, True Conservatism does not need to be changed but rather adhered too. What President Reagan did was, bring Conservatism, Conservative Values, back to its rightful place, in the forefront, after it had been suppressed by Socialism for so many years.

Now, In President Reagan’s work of bringing Conservatism back to its rightful place, there was not a “redefining” of Conservatism but rather a “Resurgence” of and a “Re-commitment” by the people who held and believed in Conservative Values to Conservatism through the exhausting efforts and work of those many “Reagan Supporters”.

There was also the “New Commitment” of the younger generation who had grown up with the constant “Barrage” of Socialism from the Main Stream Media to the Left Wing Teachers. This Commitment by a younger generation to Conservatism should be a message to those of us who are older.

Now I made the statement or comment earlier that Ronald Reagan did not create Conservatism but that he merely brought it back to its rightful place so now I will elaborate.

I’ve said this before and I will say it again. I am a Born Again

CONSERVATISM

a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change
c : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

LIBERALISM

: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties : the principles and policies of a Liberal party

Again one must realize and grasp the fact that Liberalism is now in actuality “Socialism, Communism, Marxism” or any other title or philosophy that advocates that “The State is Supreme over the Masses”.

Conservatism and Liberalism first came into being in the Garden of Eden.

After God had created all things
He saw that His creation was “Good”. He made a garden placed Adam in the garden and Adam became a farmer. God tells Adam what he is to do and what he is “Not” to do:

Gen 2:15 And Jehovah God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest there of thou shalt surely die.

Here God establishes the institution of “Law and Order”. Adam is told what he is to do, he tills the ground and can eat from every tree except the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”. The adherence to these precepts that God has “Established and Instituted” is the birth of Conservatism.

Now God creates woman and God presents her to Adam *Gen. 2:22* and Adam names her Eve *Gen. 3:20*.

One day while alone in the garden Satan speaks to Eve through a serpent and tempts her to eat of the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”, but Eve “Knows” that this is wrong as she was taught by Adam what God had “Established and Instituted”.

Let’s break it down:

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?

Satan brings doubt to the authenticity of what God has “Established and Instituted”

Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat:
Gen 3:3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Eve knows what she has been told by Adam yet she “adds” to Gods Words by saying “neither shall ye touch it” which God never said to Adam. We now have doubt and the “entertaining” of a “new thought” not from God but rather from part of His creation.

Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.

We now see the birth of “Liberalism” through a “Lie” against the “Established Institution” of the Word of God. Satan no longer casts doubts but asserts “authority” over his Creator. He tells Eve that she is not really free, that she needs to cast off the “Old Traditional” way of thinking, the old “Established” way of life and think for herself. So she goes from “entertaining” to “accepting” the thoughts and lies.

BTW: For those opponents of God and His word who say that “Christians will force God on us”. Both Adam and Eve “Exercised” free will, Free Moral agency in choosing to be disobedient to God and His Word.

For those who ask, “If God were a loving God then why didn’t He stop them from making this mess that we now have?” It is the allowance of true Liberty and Freedom, the allowance to choose. Liberalism (Socialism) will suppress that right of choice make no mistake about it.

Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.
Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig-leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

I can make no defense for Eve. She knew what God had said yet she chose to believe a lie but, Sin and the fall of mankind did not come about through Eve but rather, it was through Adam, because it was Adam who had been given dominion over the earth and not Eve. Read Romans 5:12-21.

Conservatism, True Conservatism speaks and acknowledges the truth and then allows one to make up their mind

Liberalism (Socialism) uses lies, deception, and intimidation to coerce the desired outcome of tyrants.

To put it simply:

Conservatism: is a Godly principle given and handed to mankind from his Creator

Liberalism (Socialism): Is a deception that has been perpetrated and forced upon mankind by Satan

I do not speak of Republicans and Democrats, I do not speak of Political Parties but rather I speak of you and your heart, your conscience, your desire for real Liberty and Freedom. What is it that you want for this Nation? What is in your heart for this Nation?

Is it a heart that wants Socialistic servitude or a Conservation of Liberty and Freedom?

Don’t stay at home, VOTE. If you refuse to vote out of protest you give your vote to the enemies of this Nation.

Though I am not a Mormon nor do I believe in the doctrines or teachings of Mormonism, I cast my vote for Mitt Romney because I believe that he is the closest to being a Conservative than any of the others, but you must decide for yourself.

President Ronald Reagan said the following at his inauguration:

“On the eve of our struggle for independence a man who might have been one of the greatest among the Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, President of the Massachusetts Congress, said to his fellow Americans, “Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of…. On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important questions upon which rests the happiness and the liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves.”

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act worthy of ourselves, ready to do what must be done to ensure happiness and liberty for ourselves, our children and our children’s children.”

I also believe like President Reagan, that “WE” the Americans of today can act to ensure Liberty and Freedom for ourselves, our children, and our children’s children, but the question is

WILL WE?

Author-unknown

17 Dec

The GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW DEC 16TH-2011 -DEMOCRATS SCUM OF THE EARTH
MONOLOGUE FOR THE SHOW (NARRATIVE)

Socialist/liberals/Marxist/Progressives whatever you are going by today-make me laugh.
According to you and your Liberal friends,you are the only ones that have any sense any education,and everyone else are just toothless hillbillies.

Your way or the highway right? You know it all right? You attended some left wing College and received your four year dose of Socialism right? You absorb your news via Pravda West (ABC-CBS-NBC-CNN-PBS) right?

Social agenda-let’s review the liberal left’s social agenda
let’s see
1. ABORTION-
2. HATE AMERICA
3. TAX THE HELL OUT OF MOST WHO ACTUALLY EARN A LIVING
4. SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND-TO ALL THE LAY A BOUTS
5. GIVE THE COUNTRY AWAY TO ILLEGALS-AFTER ALL CAN YOU IMAGINE THE MILLIONS OF VOTES THIS 3RD WORLD TRASH WILL PROVIDE SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY-WOW
6. HOMOSEXUALITY A MAIN STAY IN LIBERALISM
Those who tend to migrate to the Liberal Left
Whiners
Abortionist
liars
cheats
those who do nothing but want it all -at the expense of those who do actually work
Socialist
Marxist
Communist
Pseudo intellectuals (who really could not find their back side with both hands)
Feminist
Blame America crowd
WE CONSERVATIVES MUST REMEMBER
LIBERALISM equals SOCIALISM equals COMMUNISM

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.

4 Aug
Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – As the scam unravels

In Barack Hussein Obama’s America, ordinary Americans exercising their Constitutional rights are considered “terrorists”, simply because they oppose his radical agenda.

Obama’s contempt for us knows no bounds. His plan to suppress us is no longer constrained by the Constitution and the rule of law. Or so he hopes.

Although Obama is trying to empty Guantánamo Bay of real terrorists, it is still too small for Obama to house the millions of Americans who now realize that he is an illegal President and has committed felonies both before and after occupying the White House.

To facilitate the suppression of free speech and other Constitutional rights, the Obama White House has unveiled a new domestic terror strategy, which will be useful against Tea Party malcontents and supporters of Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann.

According to the plan, local communities around the country are best suited to take on the challenge of combating the kind of violent extremism that inspires people to kill or oppose Obama’s policies. The strategy calls on federal agencies to help police, schools and community groups prevent violent extremism or the exercise of former Constitutional rights through the use of gulags and re-education camps.

Unfortunately for Obama, his co-conspirators and sycophants, the scam is starting to unravel.

The most pertinent questions in the coming months will be:

    Who will be sent to prison with Obama?
    Who will cop a plea for immunity from prosecution? (hint)
    Which members of Congress will be put out to pasture for their complicity?

Obama is an illegal President according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the binding precedent of Minor vs. Happersett (1875). There is no ambiguity, although those complicit in the fraud have deliberately provided information to mislead the American people.

The Supreme Court held that Mrs. Minor was a US citizen because she was born in the US to parents who were citizens and defined that category of citizen as “natural born.” The Court specifically avoided reference to the 14th Amendment upon which the Wong Kim Ark case was based. Minor vs. Happersett

Is it a coincidence that every President since the Revolutionary era has been a natural born citizen with the exception of Obama and Chester A. Arthur, who also hid his birth records?

There is now yet another detailed technical analysis of the PDF file the White House released on April 27, 2011 indicating that it is not a scan of the original document, as claimed by the White House, but instead is the final form of an electronic file used to forge the birth certificate on Adobe software.

Members of Congress will not investigate the overwhelming proof that Obama presented, on national television, a forged Certificate of Live Birth as an official record of his birth. They will not respond to evidence that Obama’s Selective Service registration is also a forgery and that his Social Security Number is illegal.

The list of the ignorant or Obama co-conspirators include

Sen. Jeff Sessions R-AL,
Rep. Tom McClintock R-CA, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison R-TX, Rep. Kristi Noem R-SD, Rep. Leonard Lance R-NJ, Sen. Mel Martinez R-FL, Sen. Sherrod Brown D-OH, Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite R-FL, Sen. Charles Schumer D-NY, Sen. Saxby Chambliss R-GA, Sen. Robert Casey D-PA, Rep. Wally Herger R-CA, Rep. Paul Hodes D-NH, Sen. Mike Crapo R-ID, Rep Vic Snyder D-AR, Sen. Lamar Alexander R-TN, Sen. Michael Bennet D-CO, Sen. Mark. R. Warner D-VA, Sen. Dianne Feinstein D-CA, Sen. Mike Enzi R-WY.

Go here to read their confused or misleading statements.

Even Rush Limbaugh has now openly expressed doubt about Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth:

    “Tomorrow is Obama’s birthday,” he said on August 3, 2011. “Not that we’ve seen any proof of that.”

In this conspiracy of silence, not one member of Congress dares to speak about it. Their days as representatives of the people are numbered.

Despite a cowardly Congress,
a grassroots political rebellion is brewing. One Georgia county Republican Party is standing up to the probable usurpation of the Presidency.

A resolution and cover letter have been sent to three members of the U.S. House of Representatives contending that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution to serve as President and demands “unfettered access” to Obama’s records purportedly held by various state and federal agencies.

Ordinary Americans, those who Obama and his minions contemptuously call “terrorists”, are beginning to rally to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and discharge the oath that Obama has so arrogantly violated.

This is one political Pearl Harbor that we are not going to let happen.

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.

written by: Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a recently retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve. He is a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq.