Archive | liberals RSS feed for this section
13 Apr

Right Wing Group Slams HBO’s Angry Boys For ‘Sexualizing Children’ With Girl Sucking On Penis Cup

Cult comedy Angry Boys aims to shock viewers with its mockumentary style humor, but one right wing group thinks the HBO hit has gone too far and accuses a recent episode of being “akin to showing child pornography.”

The most offensive scene depicts a young girl sucking on a bright pink penis-shaped cup during a sketch about a Japanese mother (played by Australian star and director Chris Lilley) who forces her skateboarding son to act gay as a marketing tactic.
“It’s difficult to imagine that HBO would go any lower,” Dan Gainor of the Culture and Media Institute tells in an exclusive interview.

“HBO’s new show Angry Boys includes one episode so foul that they have a little girl drinking from a giant cup made from a replica penis. Oral sex ‘humor’ involving a young child shows precisely where the left’s mind is really at,” he fumed.

In an article on the Institute’s website the group ascertains that: “Promoting child pornography is a comedic way is much more shocking and outrageous than funny.”

Gainor, who recently criticized Jennifer Lopez’s new video for being a skanky bid to retain her fame “despite her fading relevance,” is not surprised that HBO would air a show like Angry Boys.

WRITTEN BY: Debbie Emery

Patriots, this just another example of the perverted mind set of those that own and produce HBO shows etc.  Bill Maher another example, all you Christians out there, all of you folks that profess your moral upbringings, all you folks out there with children,grandchildren. Let me ask you a question, “DO YOU WATCH MOVIES ON HBO, DO YOU WATCH HBO SPECIALS ETC? Next question why are you supporting HBO by using their perverted service,why are you supporting those that would undermine your morals?

I do not and will not watch HBO under any circumstance, that includes sports presentations etc.

Don’t you think it is about time we Christians, we that have children,grandchildren, we who profess to be good Christians with moral values, boycott HBO, write those sponsors that advertise on HBO and tell them “WE WILL NOT WATCH OR SUPPORT HBO NOR WILL WE USE THOSE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES THAT SPONSOR THE PERVERTED IMMORAL HBO TELEVISION CHANNEL (S).

Gary Gatehouse
Gettin after Lefty Show
Conservative talk that refuses to be politically correct


3 Mar

Liberals are the true aggressors in culture wars

If you’re not with us, you’re against us. President Bush popularized this expression after 9/11 to describe his foreign policy doctrine: Countries couldn’t support or indulge terrorists and be our friends at the same time. But his detractors quickly turned it into a fairly paranoid vision of domestic political life, as if Bush had been talking about domestic opponents and dissenters.

The irony is that few worldviews better describe the general liberal orientation to public policy and the culture war. The left often complains about the culture war as if it’s a war they don’t want to fight. They insist they just want to follow “sound science” or “what works” when it comes to public policy, but those crazy knuckle-dragging right-wingers constantly want to talk about gays and abortion and other hot-button issues.


It’s all a farce. Liberals are the aggressors in the culture war (and not always for the worse, as the civil rights movement demonstrates). What they object to isn’t so much the government imposing its values on people — heck, they love that. They see nothing wrong with imposing their views about diet, exercise, sex, race and the environment on Americans. What outrages them is resistance, or even non-compliance with their agenda. “Why are you making such a scene?” progressives complain. “Just do what we want and there will be no fuss.”

Undermining Catholics

Consider President Obama’s decision to require most religious institutions— including Catholic hospitals, schools, etc. — to pay for contraception, sterilizations and the “morning after” pill. When “ObamaCare” was still being debated, the White House had all but promised Catholic leaders that it would find a compromise to spare the church from the untenable position of paying for services that directly violate their faith. Now that ObamaCare is the law, the administration says the church, like everyone else, must fall in line.

Or consider the still-raging controversy over the Susan G. Komen For the Cure’s entirely reasonable — albeit very poorly handled — decision to withdraw its funding of Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion provider. The Komen foundation is singularly dedicated to raising research money for, and awareness about, breast cancer. It’s the folks with those pink ribbons. The organization decided to withdraw its comparatively meager funding in part because Planned Parenthood doesn’t offer mammograms. (Planned Parenthood’s president, Cecile Richards, was caught misleading people on this very point last spring.)

Other factors included the fact that Planned Parenthood is under investigation by Congress and the obvious but unstated fact that the organization is wildly controversial. It’s this last point that infuriates the left. Pro-choice activists and their allies believe that Planned Parenthood should not be controversial, nor should abortion be up for discussion, either.

If you have a problem with either it is because you are an ideologue, an extremist or a zealot opposed to the interests of womankind. And any attempt to suggest that abortion should offend the consciences of mainstream Americans, never mind such a revered organization as Komen, is simply unacceptable.

Resist, and you will pay

It’s clearly not about the money. Komen’s $600,000 in donations amount to less than .01% of Planned Parenthood’s budget (as opposed to the nearly half that comes from taxpayers). It’s about making it very clear: Resistance is not just futile, but dangerous.

That was evident almost immediately. Komen’s website was hacked, its Wikipedia page filled with smears. Various allegedly objective news outlets rallied to Planned Parenthood’s defense as if the behemoth abortion provider was a victim of the tiny little breast cancer foundation.

Komen apologized and seemed to offer a reversal of its policy. This “just goes to show you, when women speak out, women win,” responded House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

This, of course, is ridiculous propaganda. Women are not a monolithic political bloc and were not unanimously opposed to Komen’s decision. Indeed, roughly half of women are pro-life and, you can be sure, Komen will lose donations from women and men who do not want to see their donations going to abortion providers. But for a certain type of upper-class liberal woman, it simply must be asserted, if not believed, that there is only one acceptable definition of a woman’s perspective when it comes to issues such as abortion.

You can understand why Komen wants to get out of the culture war crossfire. It just wants to spend its finite resources on the race for a cure. But that’s not good enough. The real motive behind this backlash is to make it very clear: You must choose a side — ours. And once you choose our side, you can never change your mind without severe consequences. And what is true of liberal politics is also true of liberal public policy.

As the Obama administration has made clear to the Catholic Church, there is no neutrality, no safe harbor from liberalism’s moral vision. You’re either with us, or against us — which means we shall be against you.

WRITTEN BY:Jonah Goldberg is author of the forthcoming book, The Tyranny of Clichés


You liberals crack me up so righteous so intelligent,you spend most of your time trying to convince others that these things are true. BOTTOM LINE “you announce to the world your stand for the 1st amendment as long as it falls under your socialist banner ‘MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY”

5 Dec


“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.”
— Norman Thomas, six-time Socialist Party presidential candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU.

“When you hear somebody doing it [criticizing the federal government], you ought to stand up and double up your fist and stick it in the sky and shout them down.”
–Bill Clinton in a speech in Billings, Montana, 1 June ’95.

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
–Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.

“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.”
— Hillary Clinton, 1993

“The battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom…between the rotting corpse of Christianity…and the new faith of humanism. Humanism will emerge triumphant.”
— John Dunphy, January/February, 1983, issue of “The Humanist”

“Every child in America entering school at the age of five is mentally ill because he comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It is up to you as teachers to make all of these sick children well — by creating the international child of the future.”
— Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Professor of Education at Harvard, addressing the Association for Childhood Education International in April,1972

“Schools will become clinics whose purpose is to provide individualized, psycho-social treatment for the student, and teachers must become psycho-social therapists. This will include biochemical and psychological mediation of learning, as drugs are introduced experimentally to improve in the learner such qualities as personality, concentration, and memory.”
–National Education Association report entitled “Education for the ’70’s.” (1979)

further the cultural revolution are the following: the schools, colleges, and universities will be coordinated and grouped under a National Department of Education and its state and local branches. The studies will be revolutionized, being cleansed of religious, patriotic, and other features of bourgeois ideology.”
–William Z. Foster, National Chairman of the United States Communist Party, in his book “Toward a Soviet America”.

“The children who know how to think for themselves, spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone (would be) interdependent.”
— John Dewey, pioneer of American modern education system.

2nd amendment

famous left wing socialist quotes

“We’re bending the law as far as we can to ban an entirely new class of guns.”
— Rahm Emmanuel, senior advisor to Bill Clinton and Chief of staff for the New Socialist/Marxist President Bracka Hussein Obama Jr

“I am one who believes that as a first step, the United States should move expeditiously to disarm the civilian population, other than police and security officers, of all handguns, pistols, and revolvers…No one should have the right to anonymous ownership or use of a gun.”
— Professor Dean Morris, Director of Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, stated to the U.S. Congress

“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. “Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ’em all in,” I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here.”
— U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D/CA) speaking of her authorship of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban on “60 Minutes” 2/5/95

“We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
— U.S. Representative Charles Schumer (D/NY) on NBC 12/8/93

“Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal.”
— U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, December 1993

7 Jun
No Matter What
President Barak Obama will win a second term.

Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can’t. I am going on record as saying that President Barak Obama will win a second term.

The media won’t tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama’s case billions) of dollars to them in advertising.

But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.

The quality of the Republican candidate doesn’t matter. Obama gets reelected. Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win. Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins. The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins. War in the Middle East? He wins a second term.

America’s role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barak Obama! The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama’s extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.

You are crazy, Williams. Don’t you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining? Sure I do.

And that’s why I know Obama will win. The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.

Even when Obama’s policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn’t his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.

Obama’s reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:

1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn’t matter what he does. It’s a race thing. He’s one of us.

2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It’s really not more complex than that.

3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope.

4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide.

5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party.

6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics.

7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more everyday. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda.

8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist.

9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won’t vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic. And lastly,

10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn’t need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.

written by: Dr. Walter Williams

*Dr. Williams’ prediction— Dr. Williams, a conservative economist who happens to be black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently teaching at George Mason University.





23 Feb

With his direct support of the public worker union’s battle against the freely elected state leaders of Wisconsin, President Barack Obama makes clear his continued devotion to his community agitator past, and his open disdain for responsible law and order in America.

If any doubt remained regarding Barack Obama’s priorities as President of the United States, those doubts were abruptly eliminated this past week. President Obama was, is, and will remain, a community organizer. It is all he has known, and it now appears, is all he truly knows how to do.

As state governments across the nation grapple with ever worsening budget shortfalls, Barack Obama submits a national budget that adds another trillion dollars to the deficit. As governors place all options on the proverbial table in dealing with their respective budget demands, Barack Obama continues the policies of economic suicide.

Enter Wisconsin, and its Republican governor Scott Walker.

With his state buckling under the weight of public employee salaries and benefits, Walker has suggested state workers pay up to 5.8% of their salaries toward their pension plans. Presently, these same workers pay almost nothing – those plans are paid almost entirely by Wisconsin taxpayers. Walker has also requested public employees in Wisconsin pay up to $200 toward their healthcare plans – plans that are of very high quality that also makes them more expensive.

Having already set union leaders into full-on outrage mode, Governor Walker then went even further, suggesting that while public employees could continue to utilize collective bargaining for salaries, they should not be allowed to do so for benefits. Walker is hoping to help coordinate a shift in Wisconsin’s state healthcare and pension plans to programs that are far more affordable, but doing so under the present collective bargaining agreement would make such a shift near impossible, thus leaving Wisconsin taxpayers hostage to the ever-increasing demands of the now radicalized public sector unions.

Enter President Barack Obama.

Obama, as president, should have very little to say regarding a conflict between a state governor and public employees. But unlike past presidents, Barack Obama’s life’s work has been that of agitation – with labor unions as a primary means of festering that agitation into outright conflict. It is who he is at heart, and having been elected President of the United States appears to have left that fact entirely undiminished.

And so, speaking as President of the United States, Barack Obama declared the Wisconsin dispute an “assault against unions.” Such inflammatory language, while shocking by presidential standards, is just the kind of language Barack Obama and his radicalized liberalism has been using for decades. In giving his presidential support for the labor unions, whose members are now in violation of their own worker contracts, who have threatened lawmakers, who have likened a popular governor to Adolph Hitler simply because that governor is attempting to balance a budget as his own state constitution requires, President Obama has become the sedition president. Obama now lends support and financial backing against law and order in favor of union demands.

Obama’s own political action committee, Organizing for America has been sending support to the Wisconsin protesters, as well as additional support to other union protests across the nation. So too has the Democratic National Committee.

To find the reasoning behind an American president becoming so personally involved in a labor dispute among state unions and a governor, look no further than this insightful quote from Barack Obama from 2008:

“We’re ready to play offense for organized labor. It’s time we had a president who didn’t choke saying the word ‘union.’ A president who strengthens our unions by letting them do what they do best: organize our workers.”

Perhaps President Obama would do well to study his own Democratic Party history with another quote from none other than Franklin D Roosevelt, who gave a dire warning of the inherent and very serious dangers of allowing public sector workers to unionize:

“I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place” in the public sector. “A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government.”

By lending both his support and political machine to assist the Wisconsin labor unions, Barack Obama is doing the very thing FDR warned of – obstructing the operations of Government. President Obama is complicit in this act – a president who has utterly repudiated the primary duties of the office of president so that he may continue to act as a simpleton community organizer, for sadly it would appear that remains all that Obama truly knows…

Published by Ulsterman

Gary Gatehouse comments

With all that is going on in Wisconsin,Indiana,Ohio,with the National Education Association Union (Teachers socialist agenda union should be their title) it is evident that this battle has hit home with the Socialist Democrats, it has thrown a wrench into their plans of CHANGE, that being changing America to a country of SOCIALISM.

Obama has shown his true colors once again,,he is a Marxist trained from his days at home,his exposure to communism in college, his south side of Chicago community organizer days, his exposure to Saul Alinsky a Marxist activist from Chicago, William Ayers,Rev Wright all socialist,hate America crowd. Is it any wonder that Obama is what he is a MARXIST with a agenda that falls in line with the unions of this country, the Democrat Party.

OBAMA involvement,his comments about Wisconsin about unions testifies that he cares not about our country our constitution,our way of life, he is hell bent on destroying our Republic and rebuilding it as a Socialist state United Socialist States of America-along with his minions in congress,the unions, and the sheeple that call themselves DEMOCRATS he is pushing the left’s Socialist agenda forward

22 Feb

Michigan orders DPS to make huge cuts
Bobb told to consolidate services, close half of schools to end deficit
Jennifer Chambers / The Detroit News

Swift and severe changes are coming to Detroit Public Schools.

State education officials have ordered Robert Bobb to immediately implement a financial restructuring plan that balances the district’s books by closing half of its schools, swelling high school class sizes to 60 students and consolidating operations.

This week, Bobb, the district’s emergency financial manager, said he is meeting with Detroit city officials and will set up a meeting with Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency to discuss consolidation opportunities in areas such as finance, public safety, transportation and other areas.

Bobb also is preparing a list of recommended school closures and Friday said layoff discussions are under way and would be announced closer to April, when notices would be issued. “We are moving forward with the plan,” he said “Right now my focus is on my transition plan and the DEP (deficit elimination plan).”

Bobb’s last day with DPS is June 30. After that, the state plans to install another financial manager who must continue to implement Bobb’s plan, according to a Feb. 8 letter from Mike Flanagan, the state superintendent of public instruction.

In the letter, Flanagan said the Michigan Department of Education gave preliminary approval to Bobb’s plan to bring the 74,000-student district out of its financial emergency. As a condition of approval, Flanagan said Bobb cannot declare the district in bankruptcy during the remainder of his contract.

Bobb, appointed emergency financial manager in March 2009, filed his deficit elimination plan with the state in January, saying it would wipe out the district’s $327 million deficit by 2014. On Feb. 9, he told state lawmakers the plan is the only way DPS “can cut its way out” of its legacy deficit.

At the same time, Bobb said he doesn’t believe the proposal is viable because it would drive more students away, exacerbating the district’s financial emergency. But on Friday, Bobb confirmed he is working to implement the plan that will shrink the district to 72 schools for a projected 58,570 students in 2014.

“I believe the district can work its way out of these challenges,” Bobb said. “It will take some time. I am firm believer we have to continue to make the deep cuts, and they are going to be painful. In the long run, the district will be stronger. There can be no retreat.”

Bobb said he continues to work on an alternative plan — one similar to a General Motors-style restructuring — but has yet to release details or announce a sponsor for such a bill.

“Whatever comes out of the transition plan and whatever my new thinking is will be a part of that,” he said. District needs loan access

Earlier this month, Bobb told members of a joint House and Senate education committee he needed legislation to assure the district’s continued access to loans to stave off insolvency.

The district needs $219 million by March, and its bond insurer, Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp., wants the state to guarantee DPS won’t file for bankruptcy. Bobb told lawmakers the district has no such intentions.

Bobb has said school closures, bigger classes and other measures would be needed if he cannot get help from lawmakers to restructure finances in the state’s largest school district. DPS considered but declined to file for bankruptcy in 2009 Experts say DPS has an uphill battle for financial stability.

Revenue is down dramatically, enrollment losses average 8,000 students a year and pension and health care costs weigh on the district.

And the bad news continues. Among DPS’ fiscal challenges: An expected loss of $273.87 in its per-pupil foundation grant of $7,660. The loss is the result of a projected 83 percent property tax collection rate in Detroit for fiscal 2011. Last week, Gov. Rick Snyder proposed a $470 per-pupil cut for all Michigan districts.

A general fund budget strapped with annual fixed costs such as $52.6 million in pension costs, $44.6 million for health care, $26.8 million in utilities, $6.6 million in public safety and $3.5 million in unemployment. Continuing enrollment declines. DPS has lost 83,336 students in the last decade, leading to a loss in state aid of more than $573 million.

The district’s deficit grew by $100 million in the last year — to $327 million — forcing it to deepen its reliance on short- and long-term borrowing, which costs DPS $55 million a year in principal and interest payments.
New business model

Patrick Anderson, founder of the Anderson Economic Group, a Lansing-based economic consulting group, said DPS has no choice but to change its business model — dramatically.

“If this was a businesses entity, it would be in perilous straits and probably headed to bankruptcy,” he said. “When 50 percent of your customers leave and a substantial amount of revenue goes toward paying debt, the survival of your enterprise is in doubt.”

Anderson said he doesn’t fault lenders for having a lack of faith in DPS, given its deep history of fiscal mismanagement. “The question is, does the state want to indicate it will get itself further on the hook for a unit of local government that has mismanaged itself financially?” he said.

DPS slashed $548 million in requests for fiscal 2010, and Bobb said he expected the budget of about $1.2 billion to be balanced.

Steve Wasko, a DPS spokesman, said the district then learned of the following revenue losses: a $7 million property tax charge-back from Wayne County after the bankruptcies of the Greektown Casino and General Motors, an $11 million drop in state aid from property tax shortfalls and the loss of $9 million as a result of the state’s early retirement incentive program.

Increased expenses included $23.6 million for the recall of employees scheduled to be laid off, $72.2 million in unrealized labor savings and $9.1 million in unrealized savings when some school closures were canceled.

All told, the unexpected revenue losses and cost increases led to a deficit for fiscal 2010 of $113 million, Wasko said.

Last week, state Sen. Phil Pavlov, R-St. Clair Township, proposed a bill that would give the emergency financial manager the power to cancel government or teacher union contracts. DPS spends nearly two-thirds of its budget on personnel costs, or $677 million a year.

State Rep. Paul Scott, R-Grand Blanc, chairman of the joint House and Senate Education Committee, said there are concerns about the state taking on the district’s liability.

“I don’t feel the taxpayers of Michigan are willing to become liable for that money with all the structural and institutional problems that exist,” Scott said.

“We need a long-term solution for public schools for Detroit and the state,” he said. “We just don’t have the solution right now.”






19 Feb


Elizabeth Koontz becomes the head of the National Education Association, making “teacher power” the rallying cry of her administration. She advocates that teachers “organize, agitate, and strike.”

September 23, she addresses the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and states:

The NEA has a multi-faceted program already directed toward the urban school problem, embracing every phase, from the Head Start Program to sensitivity training for adults — both teachers and parents. (how many times have you heard people going to sensitivity training because they did not agree with the agenda/policy/teachings of the socialist left-homosexuality etc)

January: Today’s Education (published by the NEA) contains an article, “Forecast for the ‘70’s,” by Harold and June Shane.

Their article is a digest of many articles, within which one finds the following comments:
Ten years hence it should be more accurate to term him [the teacher] a “learning clinician.” This title is intended to convey the idea that schools are becoming “clinics” whose purpose is to provide individualized psychosocial “treatment”for the student, thus increasing his value both to himself and to society. …

Educators will assume a formal responsibility for children when they reach the age of two … [with] mandatory foster homes and “boarding schools” for children between ages two and three whose home environment was felt to have a malignant influence

Ladies and Gentlemen Moms and Dads this was the National Education Association and their ideas-their agenda way back in 1968/1969.

Fast forward to today February 19th, 2011-WISCONSIN, teachers and their students marched out of school, they marched arm and arm to protect the so called rights of the teacher the educator —remember

(1969 1968)
Elizabeth Koontz becomes the head of the National Education Association, making “teacher power” the rallying cry of her administration. She advocates that teachers “organize, agitate, and strike.

What she said in 1968 is happening today February 19th 2011 in Wisconsin.

I have used the coined term by Gary Gatehouse “INDOCTRINATION CLINICS” to describe the Public School System

(January: 1969 Today’s Education (published by the NEA) contains an article, “Forecast for the ‘70’s,” by Harold and June Shane.

Their article is a digest of many articles, within which one finds the following comments:
Ten years hence it should be more accurate to term him [the teacher] a “learning clinician.” This title is intended to convey the idea that schools are becoming “clinics” whose purpose is to provide individualized psychosocial “treatment”for the student, thus increasing his value both to himself and to society. …)

The National Education Association has been brainwashing our children for decades using the Public School system (Indoctrination Clinics) they have CHANGED the

attitude,morals,religion,respect,love of country,of our children to a generation of socialist,hate America,no respect for themselves or those around them,accepting homosexuality as ok, secularist that have no respect for Christian values,no moral compass,disrespect of everything that is good about our country.

Ladies and Gentlemen let’s be real here, the National Education Association, the Democrat Socialist party and all left wing social/political organizations have brought American to where we are today February 19th,2011 Wisconsin-we are seeing right before our eys the fruits of their Socialist agenda, we are seeing what the left has secretly over the decades done to America, we are seeing in Wisconsin -SOCIALISM-COMMUNISM-MARXISM-HATE FOR AMERICA MARCHING ARM AND ARM YOUNG AND OLD,STUDENTS,TEACHERS,GOVERNMENT WORKERS.

They are all hell bent on sucking every living drop of decency,love of country, out of Wisconsin and out of America

I ask all God Fearing Americans, all that love their country, all that still believe we as Americans have a responsibility to hand over the United States of America to our grandchildren and future generations,a country that will still be based on Christianity,patriotism,respect, our constitution still intact.

That is our responsibly we are the caretakers of this Republic we are responsible for it’s well being, we should not shun that responsibility not now not EVER

17 Feb


Liberals will tell you in no certain terms they are in fact elite-they will not use the word elite but what they say about themselves means the same thing.

They know it all, they are the most highly educated, well informed,all knowing people in the world (according to them) and if you or I or anyone else disagrees with whatever they are discussing, well hell you are just a big dummy, you just don’t get it!

You see a liberal thinks they are the elite and when someone proves them wrong,well they just talk over you, to them you agree with their way of looking at things you are A okay–but if you disagree with them well as they say ‘ITS MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY”

Liberals in fact are shallow-self indulgent-stuck on themselves pseudo intellectuals that when push comes to shove they couldn’t find their ass with both hands

Gary Gatehouse
Gettin after Lefty Show



19 Jan

Why Liberals hate Sarah Palin

It just happened again.

I spend a fair amount of time at my local coffee shop. I like to do my writing outside and, besides, it gives me an opportunity to try and initiate political conversations with the people who pass by — my hope always being to begin to enlighten them as to what conservatives really believe (and not just what the leftist media tells them.)

Today, the conversation turned to Sarah Palin and my latest acquaintance blurted out: “Oh I hate her.” Since she did not yet know my politics, and since we were in Los Angeles, it is clear that she expected to hear back what you usually hear back in this city: “Yeah, I hate her, too.” Instead, I asked her why.

At this point I could have predicted her response because it’s the same response you get from liberals no matter who on the Right you’re talking about: “Because she’s stupid.” I replied: “Being stupid is no reason to hate someone, but tell me, which one of her policies do you disagree with?” It wasn’t hard to predict her response: “All of them!”

I continued to push. “Well, then, if it’s all of them, it should be easy for you to name one.” Her reply? “They’re too many to list.”

“So don’t list them, just give me one,” I said.

This went on for awhile until my new acquaintance finally admitted that she didn’t know any of Ms. Palin’s policies. Before she ran off – Democrats always run off when asked to provide facts to justify their hatred for Republicans – I looked her in the eyes and said, “If you don’t know any of her policies, perhaps you should look into them.” She promised she would. She won’t. If there are two things you can count on with Democrats, they are filled with hate and empty of facts.

But it got me to thinking. Given that these people don’t know any of Ms. Palin’s political positions, what is it about her that they hate? It has to be her life story.

Now, to all decent people, Ms. Palin’s life story could not be more laudable. She married her high school sweetheart to whom she remains married and with whom she is apparently still in love. In the harshest of climes, she and Todd started a small business which, apparently, they ran well enough to purchase a home and raise a family. Despite the long hours required to run a family business and raise children, when Ms. Palin saw that the public schools were not doing a good job in educating her children, she joined the local PTA and was so effective there that the people who knew her best – and in small towns like Wasilla there are very few secrets – elected her to be their mayor.

Apparently, Ms. Palin was so effective in that job that the mayors of the other small towns and big cities elected her president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors. After a highly successful stint as chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, she ran an uphill battle against an entrenched Republican governor and was elected to the top position, Governor, of the largest state in the nation.

She did that job so well that her approval ratings – despite having ruffled the feathers of the leading political family in Alaska – bordered on 80 percent.

As Ms. Palin’s political horizons continued to grow, she found out she was pregnant with her fourth child, a baby with Downs Syndrome. Despite knowing in advance that this child would require even more attention and care than other kids, Ms. Palin opted to give her child – Trig – life.

So, given that those who hate – hate!!! – Ms. Palin know nothing more than these facts about her, what is it about Ms. Palin’s life story that generates this blind loathing? The answer is that, at every turn, Ms. Palin’s story debunks the myths of victimization and self-centeredness that is at the heart of the modern liberal ideology.

First, Ms. Palin is married with children. The Democrat Party’s treasured storyline is that women with children – especially those who take care of them themselves – are oppressed, victimized and doomed to a life without personal fulfillment.

Ms. Palin’s life proves them wrong and the Democrats hate her for this. If Ms. Palin were a Democrat she would have offed the last child before he was born so that she could have more “me” time to pursue her own wants and pleasures. There is clearly something very “wrong” with this woman who allowed her “special needs” child to live. They hate her for that.

One of the most obvious demographic differences between the Left and the Right is that people without children – those too self-centered and jealous of others stealing “their” attention, angry and hate-filled “feminists,” radical homosexuals and school children too young to have started a family — are just about guaranteed to pull the lever for anyone with a “D” next to their names.

Those married with children are just as assured to pull the lever for someone from the Right.
And Sarah Palin ran a small business. Democrats don’t run businesses. In fact, Democrats don’t do anything.

If you eliminated from the voting roll everyone who did nothing other than talk – the academic, the newscaster, the actor, the politician – and those who game the system, collecting welfare and years of unemployment benefits and “workman’s compensation” and food stamps, how many people would be left voting Democrat?