Archive | O’Reilly RSS feed for this section
27 Jul
California is an “ungovernable’’ financial catastrophe from which businesses are fleeing and where taxpayers are being crushed

Photobucket

California Governor-Jerry Brown to sign Dream Act for undocumented college students
VOTES VOTES VOTES VOTES-SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS SELL OUT CALIFORNIA AND SOON TO SELL OUT THE REST OF AMERICA

Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign a bill Monday that will increase access to college financial aid for undocumented immigrants.

Brown is to appear with the author of the bill, Assemblyman Gilbert Cedillo (D-Los Angeles) at Cal State Los Angeles on Monday afternoon. The governor’s spokesman, Gil Duran, confirmed that Brown intended to sign the legislation, known as the California Dream Act.

Similar legislation had been vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

CALIFORNIA DREAMIN YOU GOT THAT RIGHT

Patriots, just another example of Socialist Democrats selling out Americans, who will pay for the illegals college financial aid–you know the answer WE LEGAL AMERICANS WILL, while we scrape and save to send our kids to college these vermin, these illegal law breakers, waltz off to our colleges and we foot the Bill.

California is an “ungovernable’’ financial catastrophe from which businesses are fleeing and where taxpayers are being crushed by the burden of caring for welfare recipients and illegal immigrants.

Look at Los Angles it is almost completely Hispanic and close to half are illegals, look at the mayor of Los Angles he is Hispanic and sides with illegals, look at the city council same thing.

It is no wonder that tax paying hard working LEGAL Californians are leaving the Mexico state of California as fast as they can.

America we are being sold out by our government at every level, they bend over and kiss the backsides of illegals, and we are handed the tax bill and told to PAY UP.

When is this going to end –NEVER UNLESS WE STAND TOGETHER! This is a sell out this is a give away, this is our government sticking their thumb in the eye of all LEGAL Americans.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO AMERICA?

Photobucket

HEY YOU CONSERVATIVES OUT THERE CLICK ON THE PLAYER BELOW AND LISTEN TO THE NO PUNCHES PULLED KICK LIBERALS ASS “GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW WITH HOST TEXAN GARY GATEHOUSE

CLICK ON PLAYER TO LISTNE TO LATEST “GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW”
YOU CAN ALSO LISTEN TO PAST SHOWS –JUST SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK ON THE SHOW TITLE YOU WOULD LIKE TO HEAR

Advertisements
30 Apr
545 vs. 300,000,000 People
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall.  No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating  deficits. only the President can  propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The speaker of the House? John Boehner

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want.  If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal  government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it’s because they want them in  Iraq and Afghanistan …

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they  alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…
We should vote all of  them out of office and clean up their mess!

written by: Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando  Sentinel  Newspaper.

17 Feb


LIBERALS LITTLE CHILDREN IN ADULT CLOTHES

Liberals will tell you in no certain terms they are in fact elite-they will not use the word elite but what they say about themselves means the same thing.

They know it all, they are the most highly educated, well informed,all knowing people in the world (according to them) and if you or I or anyone else disagrees with whatever they are discussing, well hell you are just a big dummy, you just don’t get it!

You see a liberal thinks they are the elite and when someone proves them wrong,well they just talk over you, to them you agree with their way of looking at things you are A okay–but if you disagree with them well as they say ‘ITS MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY”

Liberals in fact are shallow-self indulgent-stuck on themselves pseudo intellectuals that when push comes to shove they couldn’t find their ass with both hands

Gary Gatehouse
hos
t
Gettin after Lefty Show

PAST GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOWS YOU MIGHT WANT TO LISTEN TO


TAKE SOME TIME OFF AND HAVE A LISTEN TO THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW-JUST CLICK ON THE PLAYER BELOW

15 Feb

THE GETTIN AFTER LEFTY SHOW BROADCASTING ON WWW WORLD WIDE WEB

The Gettin after Lefty Show is back on the air-Feb 15th

TWO TAKE NO PRISONERS GOVERNORS-FACEBOOK CONSERVATIVE DISCUSSIONS

The National Education Association working to fulfill the Democrat Socialist Parties Socialist Agenda by using OUR CHILDREN.

Conservative Facebook discussions how refreshing and enlightening they were

We have some very passionate,concerned conservatives that love their country and recognize what is going down in our country and folks a lot of them are on Facebook forum ONE MILLION PEOPLE TO DEFEAT OBAMA-IF YOU ARE A TRUE PATRIOT JOIN THIS GROUP/FORUM TODAY

TRUE LEADERSHIP

Take no prisoners/no nonsense governors that tell it like it IS

The Gettin after Lefty Show is back on the air-Feb 15th-TWO TAKE NO PRISONERS GOVERNORS-FACEBOOK CONSERVATIVE DISCUSSIONS

The show is back, we are back GETTIN AFTER LEFTY, hope you folks will continue to support the show. You can CLICK HERE to sign on as a Gettin after Lefty Show fan/supporter

JOIN THE CONSERVATIVES SPEAK OUT FORUM WHERE REAL CONSERVATIVES HANG OUT-FOR WE WHO BELIEVE SOCIAL ISSUES ARE JUST AS IMPORTANT AS ECONOMIC/GOVERNMENT ISSUES CLICK HERE TO JOIN

11 Feb

Left scared of ‘Brack Hussein Obama Jr birth certificate’ issue

Why is the political left so scared of the “birth certificate” issue, while many on the right dismiss it?

The left-wing Mother Jones magazine recently published a lengthy piece by David Corn explaining why the new push by at least 10 states to require proof of constitutional eligibility before future presidential candidates can get on ballots is such a threat to Barack Obama.

The article virtually assumes Obama does not have a long-form Hawaii birth certificate to show states in 2012.

So why is the left apoplectic about states enforcing the Constitution? Because, to the left, political empowerment trumps the Constitution seven days a week and twice on Sunday.

In fact, they are incapable of even viewing legislation designed to enforce the Constitution’s requirement that U.S. presidents are “natural born citizens” as anything other than political tricks designed to drive Obama from power.

I understand that. The left has a political slogan it has lived by since the days of V.I. Lenin: “By any means necessary.”

Stand up for truth and transparency — and the Constitution! Magnetic bumper sticker declares: “Birther on Board”

In case you can’t figure out the translation of that message, it’s simple: The end justifies the means. Anything and everything that elevates the left’s agenda is good – no matter what. In the world of real politick, this mindset has resulted in mass murder on a scale that is unimaginable to most Americans, gulags, concentration camps, forced abortions, state-created famines, holocaust and unspeakable terror.

To the left, the Constitution is nothing more than a tool to be manipulated and distorted to support its statist agenda.

Meanwhile, though, tens of millions of Americans awakened to a shocking political reality after the 2008 election: The system had broken down. No controlling legal authority vetted the winning candidate to ensure he was constitutionally eligible to serve as president. According to the latest poll done on the subject, 58 percent of Americans have doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

It would seem only natural that a grass-roots political movement has arisen at the state level to ensure such a fiasco is never repeated.

But, at the same time, most Republicans and high-profile conservative activists are as afraid of this eligibility issue as the left is.

Why?

I believe it’s quite simple:

* Like the establishment news media, they not only missed this epic development as it was unfolding in 2008, but many of them have continued to dismiss it as inconsequential and “not a winning issue.” “We have more important ideas to debate,” they say? More important? What is more important than the integrity ofthe Constitution?

* They are incapable of standing up to the news media heckling on this issue. They are afraid of being portrayed as “birthers,” “conspiracy nuts” and having the issue blow up in their faces.

That’s why I am so proud of the state legislators who have moved this issue down the road.

This isn’t just about Obama.

This is about the future of our country – whether we are going to continue to live in a nation governed by the rule of law or if we intend to abandon the constitutional framework that has guided us for 222 years.

To me it’s important to strengthen the Constitution whether Obama passes the test of eligibility or not.

As a nation, we should never again live in doubt as to whether the occupant of the White House is legitimate or not.

Like it or not, we will never be able to answer that question for certain without examining his long-form birth certificate. That is the only document that can answer the questions as to who his parents were and where he was born.

Digital short forms won’t do it.

Newspaper announcements won’t do it.

New documents created by Hawaii for the purpose of quelling the controversy and making money off it won’t do it.

And Barack Obama’s autobiographical fairy tales won’t do it.

I’m not afraid of the truth, no matter what it reveals.

Why are Barack Hussein Obama Jr and his supporters?

**written by Joseph Farah

10 Feb

Photobucket

11th state eyeing proof of Obama’s eligibility
Lawmaker files new bill to require presidential candidates be qualified

And then there were 11.

The push at the state level to ensure no future president enters office under the cloud of suspicion that he or she might not be constitutionally eligible is growing.

At the request of a local tea-party group, Tennessee state Sen. Mae Beavers has filed a bill that would require presidential candidates to show an original birth certificate establishing constitutional eligibility for the office before getting on the ballot beginning in 2012.

Beavers told a local television station she said she wouldn’t comment about whether or not she believes Obama meets the test because she has no personal knowledge about whether or not he can prove it. She said, however, this legislation would erase all concerns in future elections.

“We just want to make doubly sure in Tennessee if we put someone on the ballot, they are qualified to run,” said Beavers.

That makes 11 state legislatures now considering such bills – with several of them well on the way to passage.

There is Arizona’s HB2544, Connecticut’s SB391, Georgia’s HB37, Indiana’s SB114, Maine’s LD34, Missouri’s HB283, Montana’s HB205, Nebraska’s LB654, Oklahoma’s SB91, SB384 and SB540, and Texas; HB295 and HB529.

New Hampshire last year adopted HB1245, but it requires only a statement under penalty of perjury that a candidate meets the qualification requirements of the U.S. Constitution, which is something similar to what the political parties already state regarding their candidates.

Other plans were considered last year in Texas, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Missouri, Minnesota, Maine and Arizona, and Arizona’s probably got the closest to law, falling a “pocket veto” short in the state Senate, despite widespread support.

Arizona

This is the one that could change the game. A plan in Arizona to require presidential candidates to prove their eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is approaching critical mass, even though it has just been introduced.

The Arizona Bill proposal reads as follows

The proposal is highly specific and directly addresses the questions that have been raised by Barack Obama’s occupancy of the White House. It says:

Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate’s citizenship and age and shall append to theaffidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate’s age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States

The Arizona bill also requires attachments, “which shall be sworn to under penalty of perjury,” including “an original long form birth certificate that includes the date and place of birth, the names of the hospital and the attending physician and signatures of the witnesses in attendance.”

It also requires testimony that the candidate “has not held dual or multiple citizenship and that the candidate’s allegiance is solely to the United States of America.”

“If both the candidate and the national political party committee for that candidate fail to submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate’s name on theballot in this state,” the plan explains.

COMMENTS BY GARY GATEHOUSE

Who would have thought that America would be questioning the eligibility of the current person occupying the White House, who would have ever thought that one of our political parties is so hungry for power,so set on destroying American and rebuilding it as a Socialist Regime that they would go to any lengths to circumvent the rule of law our constitution and the American people to achieve fulfilling their SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST AGENDA.

If in fact Brack Hussein Obama Jr is found ineligible for the office of President of the United States, I say all those involved with his vetting process the DNC the speaker of the House and all Democrat Leadership should be tried and sent to prison.. If in fact Obama is found ineligible I want the Democrats political heads to roll…

BRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR LOOKING FOR HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE LOOKIN FOR HIS RING DANG DO

Photobucket

10 Feb

Bill O’Reilly bashes ‘nutty’ birthers

Fox News anchor responds to e-mail by criticizing those seeking eligibility proof

Fox News anchor Bill O’Reilly took a jab at those seeking proof of Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for president this week by referring to them as “nutty.”

The comment came in a response to a viewer who watched the top-rated cable host’s interview with Obama on Super Bowl Sunday

During Monday night’s edition of “The O’Reilly Factor,” the host read an e-mail from Ed Harris, a viewer from Youngsville, N.C.

The letter stated, “Bill, thanks for winning me $100. I bet a friend you would not ask Obama about his birth certificate, and you didn’t.”

O’Reilly responded to Harris by saying with a grin, “Let me get this straight, Ed. You found someone who bet you a hundred bucks that I would ask the president about the nutty birth-certificate stuff. Can you please send me that person’s name? I would like to do business with this guy.”

O’Reilly invited and then disinvited WND Editor Joseph Farah on his program to have a discussion about Obama’s legal qualification for office.

Farah had challenged O’Reilly in a column about his assertions that he had investigated the questions involving Obama’s birth certificate and found them to be without merit.

At the time, Farah wrote: “I have a challenge to my old buddy Bill O’Reilly – put up or shut up!

“You told your viewers this week that challenges to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility are ‘bogus.’

“You claimed you and your news organization examined Obama’s birth certificate last year and found it to be in order.

“Can I ask a question, Bill? Why don’t you simply reveal to your viewers exactly what you saw and what you found?

“Fox News Channel’s slogan is, ‘We report, you decide.’ Why don’t you try actually reporting the story, rather than deciding for us?”

Farah said he was not surprised O’Reilly wouldn’t agree to a civil discourse and a calm discussion of the facts.

“I wanted to shed light on this issue, but evidently O’Reilly only wants ratings heat,” he said.

written by By Joe Kovacs